Sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in cardiomyopathies such as hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), non-dilated left ventricular (NDLCM), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) remains a crucial but complex clinical challenge, especially among younger populations. Accurate risk stratification is hampered by the variability in phenotypic expression and genetic heterogeneity inherent in these conditions. This article explores the multifaceted strategies for preventing SCD across a spectrum of cardiomyopathies and emphasizes the integration of clinical evaluations, genetic insights, and advanced imaging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in assessing SCD risks. Advanced imaging, particularly CMR, not only enhances our understanding of myocardial architecture but also serves as a cornerstone for identifying at-risk patients. The integration of new research findings with current practices is essential for advancing patient care and improving survival rates among those at the highest risk of SCD. This review calls for ongoing research to refine risk stratification models and enhance the predictive accuracy of both clinical and imaging techniques in the management of cardiomyopathies.

Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] −5.32 min, 95% CI −19.01–8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD −1.10 min, 95% CI −2.48–0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40–1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

Background: More and more heart failure (HF) patients aged ≥ 75 years undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation, however the data regarding the outcomes and their predictors are scant. We investigated the mid- to long-term outcomes and their predictors in CRT patients aged ≥ 75 years. Methods: Patients in the Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Modular (CRT MORE) Registry were divided into three age-groups: 80 years, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Over long-term follow-up (1020 days (IQR 680-1362)) mortality was higher in patients ≥ 75 years than in the other two groups. Hospitalization and composite event rates were similar in patients ≥ 75 years and those aged 65–74 (9 vs. 11.8%; p = 0.26, and 26.7 vs. 20.5%; p = 0.06). Conclusion: Positive clinical response and hospitalization rates do not differ between CRT recipients ≥ 75 years and those aged 65–74. However, age > 80 years, COPD and CKD are predictors of worse outcomes.

Aims. The occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients is related to the presence and extent of fibrotic/scar tissue. As coronary atherosclerosis is the underlying cause of myocardial ischemia and fibrosis, in IHD patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) we investigated the relation between the VA burden and the complexity of coronary atherosclerotic lesions. Methods and results. In IHD patients who underwent coronary angiography and ICD implant, the Syntax scores I and II (SSI-II), as index of the severity of the coronary atherosclerotic disease, and the occurrence of VA were assessed. Overall 144 patients were included (123 males). Of these 22 patients (15%) experienced at least one episode of VA (cycle length 298 ± 19 msec) that required ICD intervention. The number of episodes per patient and per year was 4 ± 6 and 2.8 ± 4, respectively. Patients that experienced a VA compared to those free from arrhythmic events did not have distinct baseline clinical characteristics except for a higher SS I and SS II (21 (IQR 13–38) vs. 16 (IQR 10–23); p = 0.037; and 50 (IQR 39–62) vs. 42 (IQR 34–50); p = 0.012). In the binary logistic regression analyses the SS I and II were the only independent predictors of VA occurrence. A higher SS II was also associated with an earlier time to first event (p = 0.005). Conclusion. Higher SS I-II scores reflect a more severe coronary atherosclerosis and are associated with a greater VA burden. Further studies are needed to better clarify the ability of SSI-II to stratify the risk of IHD patients to develop life-threatening VA.

Background/Objectives: Vulnerable coronary plaques are strongly associated with acute coronary events, posing significant therapeutic challenges despite statin therapy. This case report evaluates the impact of Evolocumab, a PCSK-9 inhibitor, on stabilizing high-risk plaques and promoting phenotypic transformation, assessed through coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Methods: A 50-year-old male with chronic coronary syndrome and a history of myocardial infarction underwent a CCTA, revealing a high-risk plaque (approximately 50%) in the proximal LAD. Despite achieving LDL-C targets with statin therapy, the plaque showed vulnerability features. Evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneously every two weeks) was added to therapy, combined with dietary counseling and dual antiplatelet therapy. Results: A follow-up CCTA at 24 months demonstrated significant reductions in plaque volume and positive remodeling, with a transformation from a mixed phenotype to a predominantly calcified plaque. LDL-C levels decreased from 71 mg/dL to 18 mg/dL. The patient remained asymptomatic, with no cardiovascular events reported during the follow-up. Conclusions: This case highlights the role of PCSK-9 inhibitors in stabilizing high-risk plaques, achieving structural changes that promote stability beyond LDL-C reduction. Advanced imaging techniques such as CCTA proved essential for risk stratification and monitoring therapy efficacy. Evolocumab offers a promising adjunctive treatment for high-risk patients unsuitable for elective revascularization, potentially redefining the standard of care for plaque stabilization in this setting.

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal modality for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF), offering myocardial selectivity through irreversible electroporation while sparing surrounding structures. However, concerns have emerged regarding potential subclinical hemolysis, reflected by alterations in biochemical markers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study involving 249 patients undergoing PVI: 121 treated with PFA (PulseSelect or FARAPULSE) and 128 with radiofrequency (RF) ablation (PVAC catheter). Laboratory parameters were assessed at baseline, post-procedure, and at discharge, including hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell (RBC) count, platelet count, creatinine, and LDH. The primary endpoint was the variation in blood cell indices; the secondary endpoint was the evaluation of LDH and hematocrit changes. Statistical analysis included t-tests and chi-square tests. Results: Baseline characteristics and pre-procedural labs did not differ significantly between groups. No significant changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit, RBC count, platelet count, or creatinine were observed post-ablation or at discharge. However, LDH levels significantly increased in the PFA group both post-procedurally and at discharge (p < 0.001), without concurrent changes in other blood cell parameters. Conclusions: PFA and RF ablation yield comparable hematological profiles after PVI, with no significant impact on key blood cell parameters. Nonetheless, the consistent rise in LDH levels in the PFA group suggests mild, subclinical hemolysis or tissue injury due to more extensive lesions. While supporting the hematologic safety of PFA, these findings underscore the need for further studies to assess the clinical significance of these biochemical alterations, particularly in high-risk patients or extensive ablation settings.