Social inequity in healthcare persists even in countries with universal healthcare. The Social Health Bridge-Building Programme aims to reduce healthcare inequities. This paper provides a detailed description of the programme. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) was used to structure the description. The programme theory was outlined using elements from the British Medical Research Council’s framework, including identifying barriers to healthcare, synthesising evidence, describing the theoretical framework, creating a logic model, and engaging stakeholders. In the Social Health Bridge-Building Programme, student volunteers accompany individuals to healthcare appointments and provide social support before, during, and after the visit. The programme is rooted in a recovery-oriented approach, emphasising personal resources and hope. The programme finds support in constructs within the health literacy framework. Student volunteers serve as health literacy mediators, supporting individuals in navigating the healthcare system while gaining knowledge and skills. This equips students for their forthcoming roles as healthcare professionals, and potentially empowers them to develop and implement egalitarian initiatives within the healthcare system, including initiatives that promote organisational health literacy responsiveness. The Social Health Bridge-Building Programme is a promising initiative that aims to improve equity in healthcare by addressing individual, social, and systemic barriers to healthcare. The programme’s description will guide forthcoming evaluations of its impact.

Objectives: The aim of this overview was to systematically identify and synthesize existing evidence from systematic reviews on the impact of prehospital physician involvement.Methods: The Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched from 1 January 2000 to 17 November 2017. We included systematic reviews comparing physician-based with non–physician-based prehospital treatment in patients with one of five critical conditions requiring a rapid response.Results: Ten reviews published from 2009 to 2017 were included. Physician treatment was associated with increased survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and patients with severe trauma; in the latter group, the result was based on more limited evidence. The success rate of prehospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) has improved over the years, but ETI by physicians is still associated with higher success rates than intubation by paramedics. In patients with severe traumatic brain injury, intubation by paramedics who were not well skilled to do so markedly increased mortality.Conclusions: Current evidence is hinting at a benefit of physicians in selected aspects of prehospital emergency services, including treatment of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and critically ill or injured patients in need of prehospital intubation. Evidence is, however, limited by confounding and bias, and comparison is hampered by differences in case mix and the organization of emergency medical services. Future research should strive to design studies that enable appropriate control of baseline confounding and obtain follow-up data for the proportion of patients who die in the prehospital setting.

Managing a long-term condition requires higher health literacy. Social networks may play a crucial role for self-management. However, the pathway is not entirely understood. This study aimed to examine whether the association between social support and self-rated health is mediated by health literacy among individuals with a long-term condition. This cross-sectional study used data from the “How are you?” 2021 survey in Central Denmark Region. Social support was assessed using a single question, health literacy with two dimensions from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ): ‘Understanding health information’ and ‘Engaging with healthcare providers’, and self-rated health with a single question from SF-36. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the associations, and multiple mediation analyses were performed using the Karlson-Holm-Breen method. A total of 10,787 individuals with a long-term condition were included in the study, whereas 6% (n = 595) reported a low level of social support. Both health literacy scales mediated the association between social support and self-rated health, particularly the ability to engage with healthcare providers, accounting for 25% of the variance. After adjustment for sociodemographic factors, individuals with a low level of social support had significantly higher odds of reporting difficulties in understanding health information (OR 2.53 (95% CI: 1.84–3.48)) and engaging with healthcare providers (OR 3.77 (95% CI: 2.96–4.79)). Health literacy, particularly the ability to engage with healthcare providers, was a mediator between social support and self-rated health. Additionally, a low level of social support was associated with higher odds of reporting lower health literacy. These findings suggest that strategies to enhance health literacy, improve health outcomes, and reduce health inequities may benefit from strengthening individuals’ social network, particularly focusing on those with limited support.