The ankle-brachial index (ABI) was introduced as a screening method for the diagnosis of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Later findings recognized ABI as a prognostic marker of adverse cardiovascular events due to its relation to atherosclerosis in other vascular territories. This narrative review aims to appraise the validity, reliability, and utility of ABI in the detection of PAD and the determination of global atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk. While the ABI value can be influenced by different physiological characteristics including age, sex, body position, and techniques used for ABI determination, it has high specificity and reproducibility in the assessment of vascular patients. In conclusion, when used correctly, the ABI remains a reliable and invaluable indicator of lower-limb perfusion and a useful tool for predicting the risk of future cardiovascular events. However, its underutilization in clinical settings is noteworthy.

Summary: Endovascular interventions and diagnostic examinations using iodinated contrast media (ICM) are standard of care in current vascular medicine. Although ICM use is generally considered safe, it may be associated with adverse reactions, vary from minor disturbances to rare, but severe life-threatening complications. This position paper of European Society of Vascular Medicine integrates current knowledge and summarizes the key information related to the use of intravascular ICM, serving as recommendation on prevention and management of acute, late, and very late adverse reactions. It should help the health professionals in all fields of vascular medicine to make decisions in daily practice for safe use of contrast media.

Summary: Background: Percutaneous endovascular therapy is nowadays the leading treatment option for patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, but it can be complicated with distal embolization (DE). Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2054 endovascular revascularization interventions performed in patients with disabling claudication or chronic critical limb ischemia in the Catheterisation Laboratory of the Department of Vascular Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana between January 2014 and December 2018. Lesions were treated by balloon angioplasty and/or stent implantation, without atherectomy. Results: The overall incidence of DE was 0.9%. DE was more frequent in females than males (1.6% vs 0.5%, p = 0.011), in the absence of antiplatelet treatment prior to intervention compared to previous antiplatelet treatment (2.1% vs 0.6%, p = 0.005) and in femoropopliteal stenting compared to angioplasty without stenting (2.2% vs 0.8%, p = 0.037). DE was successfully managed with percutaneous aspiration, in combination with angioplasty when necessary, in 84% of cases. In remaining 16% of patients, DE was managed with surgical thromboembolectomy. Conclusions: The incidence of DE during endovascular revascularization of chronic atherosclerotic lesions in lower limb arteries without use of atherectomy was low. DE was more frequent in women, in patients without prior antiplatelet treatment and in femoropopliteal stenting. The majority of DE was successfully managed percutaneously.

Background: Percutaneous endovascular revascularisation interventions are increasingly used in treatment of lower extremity artery disease and may expose patients to substantial radiation. Patients and methods: Dose-area product (DAP) was retrospectively analysed in 1063 consecutive interventions performed in adult patients with lower extremity artery disease in a single tertiary medical centre. Differences between procedure types, stratified according to anatomical region and arterial lesion complexity were evaluated. Results: Median DAP for diagnostic interventions was 35.6 (15.0–52.4) Gy cm² in aorto-below-knee arteriography and 3.2 (2.0–4.5) Gy cm² in ipsilateral femoral arteriography (p < 0.001). For angioplasty without stenting, median DAP was 53.4 (28.6–87.4) Gy cm² for pelvic interventions vs. 5.9 (4.3–8.6) Gy cm² for antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (p < 0.001). For stenting, median DAP was 54.9 (32.5–91.2) Gy cm² for pelvic interventions vs. 8.3 (6.0–12.3) Gy cm² for antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (p < 0.001). Inside the same anatomical region, diagnostic interventions were associated with significantly lower DAP than therapeutic interventions. Stenting vs no stenting increased DAP values only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions (8.3 (6.0–12.3) vs 5.9 (4.3–8.6) Gy cm² (p < 0.001). Arterial lesion complexity affected DAP values only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal therapeutic interventions. Conclusions: The most important factor influencing patients’ radiation doses was the anatomical region. Pelvic interventions were associated with 6–11-times higher DAP values than femoropopliteal interventions with antegrade ipsilateral approach. Stenting and complexity of lesions increased DAP only in antegrade ipsilateral femoropopliteal interventions.

Summary: The new guidelines for the management of peripheral arterial and aortic diseases (PAAD) from the European Society of Cardiology and endorsed by the European Society of Vascular Medicine (ESVM), emphasize on a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach focusing on prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with a wide range of PAAD, including lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The aim of this summary, focusing on PAD and coordinated by the Young Academy of ESVM, is to provide young angiologists with the fundamental principles of these guidelines and to assist them in navigating their everyday clinical practice. PAD diagnosis relies on objective evaluation of flow/oxygen reduction at rest, with arterial ultrasound as the first imaging modality to confirm the presence of arterial lesions. The main goals of PAD management are not only to improve functioning and prevent the occurrence of adverse events at the lower limb level, but also to reduce the overall atherosclerotic burden and achieve the general well-being of patients. To this end, traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors need to be properly addressed through lifestyle changes and tailored drug therapies. For patients with exertional limb symptoms, supervised exercise training is recommended. Interventional treatment is indicated for limb salvage in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia and may also be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting in less severe patients with persisting symptoms and reduced quality of life after a minimum period of optimal medical treatment including exercise therapy. For trainees or young specialists in Angiology/Vascular Medicine, these guidelines provide essential elements to improve patient management, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, and ensure an integrated approach to vascular diseases.