There exists a tremendous opportunity in identifying and determining the appropriate predictive and prognostic biomarker(s) for risk stratification of patients with colorectal cancers (CRCs). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising prognostic and possibly predictive biomarker in the personalized management of patients with CRCs. The disease is particularly suited to a liquid biopsy–based approach since there is a great deal of shedding of circulating tumor fragments (cells, DNA, methylation markers, etc). ctDNA has been shown to have several potential applications, including detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), monitoring for early recurrence, molecular profiling, and therapeutic response prediction. The utility of ctDNA has broadened from its initial use in the advanced/metastatic setting for molecular profiling and detection of acquired resistance mechanisms, toward identifying MRD, as well as early detection. Prospective studies such as CIRCULATE, COBRA, Dynamic II/III, and ACT3 are underway in the MRD setting to further understand how ctDNA may be used to inform clinical decision making using both tumor-informed and tumor-agnostic platforms. These prospective studies use ctDNA to guide management of patients with CRC and will be critical to help guide how and where ctDNA should or should not be used in clinical decision making. It is also important to understand that there are different types of ctDNA liquid biopsy platforms, each with advantages and disadvantages in different clinical indications. This review provides an overview of the current and evolving use of ctDNA in CRC.

The expression of the protein Mesothelin (MSLN) is highly variable in several malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), and high levels are associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and worse patient survival. Colorectal cancer is both a common and deadly cancer; being the third most common in incidence and second most common cause of cancer-related death. While systemic therapy remains the primary therapeutic option for most patients with stage IV (metastatic; m) CRC, their disease eventually becomes treatment refractory, and 85% succumb within 5 years. Microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRC tumors, which constitute more than 90% of patients with mCRC, are generally refractory to immunotherapeutic interventions. In our current work, we characterize MSLN levels in CRC, specifically correlating expression with clinical outcomes in relevant CRC subtypes, and explore how MSLN expression impacts the status of immune activation and suppression in the peritumoral microenvironment. Higher MSLN expression is prevalent in CMS1 and CMS4 CRC subtypes and correlates with higher gene mutation rates across the patient cohorts. Further, MSLN-high patients exhibit increased M1/M2 macrophage infiltration, PD-L1 staining, immune-inhibitory gene expression, enrichment in inflammatory, TGF-β, IL6/JAK/STAT3, IL2/STAT5 signaling pathways, and mutation in KRAS and FBXW7. Together, these results suggest that MSLN protein is a potential target for antigen-specific therapy and supports investigation into its tumorigenic effects to identify possible therapeutic interventions for patients with high MSLN expressing MSS CRC.

The incidence and mortality of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is on the rise, which highlights the unmet need for advances in treatment options. The landscape of treatment for this cancer is rapidly evolving with novel combination strategies including immunotherapy, radiation therapy and biomarker-guided therapy. This review article features an overview of recent advancements in both locoregional and metastatic SCCA. The recent focus on locoregional SCCA management is to tailor treatment according to tumor burden and minimize treatment-related toxicities. Mitomycin plus either infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine is used for first-line chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is the preferred modality for radiation for locoregional anal cancer. Locally recurrent disease is managed with surgical resection. Systemic treatment is first-line for metastatic SCCA and immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab being included as second-line agents. Current and future clinical trials are evaluating treatments for SCCA including immunotherapy alone or in combination regimens, radiotherapies, targeted treatments and novel agents. Another critical aspect of current research in SCCA is the personalization of CRT and immunotherapies based on molecular characterization and biomarkers such as the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and circulating tumor DNA.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is an emerging tool in the evaluation of GI cancers. Challenges remain in defining its utility and role as a primary end point in therapeutic trials. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) ctDNA GI working group was created to evaluate current data and provide guidance on the inclusion of ctDNA in GI cancer trials. METHODS: The NCI GI steering committee assigned four task force members to serve as co-chairs for the working group. Co-chairs identified experts within each GI disease group to form a panel that convened to review data and provide recommendations. The group focused on ctDNA's role as a potential surrogate for assessing prognosis and guiding treatment decisions that may enhance GI cancer trials. A manuscript was drafted, circulated, revised, and voted on by the panel. The final draft was reviewed by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. RESULTS: Further data are required to support ctDNA as a primary end point for late-phase therapeutic trials, particularly in studies that could change the standard-of-care. However, the group supports ctDNA as a primary efficacy end point for phase II studies and as a noninvasive evaluation strategy for new drug development. Incorporation of ctDNA as a biomarker in trial design must consider the specific context of disease biology of the GI cancer subtypes. ctDNA should be incorporated as an exploratory end point across a variety of disease settings and indications. Several practical considerations were identified to optimize the incorporation of ctDNA in future trial design. CONCLUSION: Prospective trials are required to clarify the role of ctDNA as a valid surrogate end point for progression-free or overall survival in GI cancers.

The escalating global burden of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is imposing a critical health burden as a major cause of cancer-related mortality. Survival rates are low due to late-stage diagnosis and complex tumor microenvironments. The review discusses the multifaceted approach required for effective management, including the latest therapeutic approaches, and highlights the critical role of the tumor microenvironment in therapy response. Innovations in targeted therapies and immunotherapies are emphasized, with a focus on genetic mutations such as BRCA and KRAS that influence treatment outcomes. Furthermore, the article explores emerging therapeutic strategies, including the utilization of novel drug combinations. The review underscores the necessity for ongoing research to improve diagnostic techniques, develop more effective therapies, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes in pancreatic cancer.

Background: Circulating tumor (ct)DNA is a prognostic biomarker in gastrointestinal malignancies. In rectal cancer, its utility to inform perioperative management and predict recurrence, particularly in patients undergoing non-operative management (NOM), remains unclear. Studies are needed to clarify how post-neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and post-surgical ctDNA status correlate with clinical outcomes in localized rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed ctDNA data from 220 patients with rectal cancer using a personalized tumor-informed assay (Signatera™, Natera, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). Of these, 148 (67.3%) underwent NAT followed by surgery, and 72 (32.7%) underwent NAT followed by NOM. We assessed associations between post-NAT ctDNA status and survival outcomes. In the surgical cohort, we examined associations between post-operative ctDNA status and clinical response, pathological response, survival outcomes, and NAR scores. Results: In the surgical cohort, ctDNA positivity at the post-operative MRD timepoint was a strong predictor of recurrence, with an 88.3% relapse rate compared to 11.5% in ctDNA-negative patients (p < 0.001). Among the 64 NOM patients with post-NAT ctDNA, 21.9% (14/64) were ctDNA-positive, of whom 100% (14/14) relapsed (92.9% local-only), 13 relapsed by the time of data cut-off, and one relapsed 8 months after the cut-off. Only 10% (5/50) of the ctDNA-negative NOM patients experienced local recurrence (p < 0.0001). ctDNA positivity post-NAT was associated with inferior DFS (p = 0.003). Conclusion: ctDNA was a strong predictor of recurrence in rectal cancer, including in NOM settings. In NOM patients, ctDNA detected local recurrences, highlighting its potential to guide post-NAT surveillance and treatment.