Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy heralds a significant leap forward in managing GI disorders. AI-enabled applications, such as computer-aided detection and computer-aided diagnosis, have significantly advanced GI endoscopy, improving early detection, diagnosis and personalized treatment planning. AI algorithms have shown promise in the analysis of endoscopic data, critical in conditions with traditionally low diagnostic sensitivity, such as indeterminate biliary strictures and pancreatic cancer. Convolutional neural networks can markedly improve the diagnostic process when integrated with cholangioscopy or endoscopic ultrasound, especially in the detection of malignant biliary strictures and cholangiocarcinoma. AI’s capacity to analyze complex image data and offer real-time feedback can streamline endoscopic procedures, reduce the need for invasive biopsies, and decrease associated adverse events. However, the clinical implementation of AI faces challenges, including data quality issues and the risk of overfitting, underscoring the need for further research and validation. As the technology matures, AI is poised to become an indispensable tool in the gastroenterologist’s arsenal, necessitating the integration of robust, validated AI applications into routine clinical practice. Despite remarkable advances, challenges such as operator-dependent accuracy and the need for intricate examinations persist. This review delves into the transformative role of AI in enhancing endoscopic diagnostic accuracy, particularly highlighting its utility in the early detection and personalized treatment of GI diseases.

This review provides a practical and comprehensive overview of non-pharmacological interventions for metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MASLD), focusing on dietary and exercise strategies. It highlights the effectiveness of coffee consumption, intermittent fasting, and Mediterranean and ketogenic diets in improving metabolic and liver health. The review emphasizes the importance of combining aerobic and resistance training as a critical approach to reducing liver fat and increasing insulin sensitivity. Additionally, it discusses the synergy between diet and exercise in enhancing liver parameters and the role of gut microbiota in MASLD. The paper underscores the need for a holistic, individualized approach, integrating diet, exercise, gut health, and patient motivation. It also highlights the long-term benefits and minimal risks of lifestyle interventions compared to the side effects of pharmacological and surgical options. The review calls for personalized treatment strategies, continuous patient education, and further research to optimize therapeutic outcomes in MASLD management.

Background: We examined trends in NAFLD-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2022, focusing on sex, racial differences, and specific age groups. Methods: We analyzed age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for NAFLD-related deaths using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and assessed differences between sex and racial groups. Results: Between 1999 and 2022, NAFLD-related mortality rose from an age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) of 0.2 to 1.7 per 100,000, with an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 10.0% (p < 0.001). In all, 85.4% of the cases were reported after 2008. Females (0.2–2 per 100,000, AAPC: 11.7%, p < 0.001) saw a steeper increase than males (0.2–1.3 per 100,000, AAPC: 9.3%, p < 0.001). White individuals’ AAMR rose from 0.2 to 1.9 per 100,000 (AAPC: 10.8%, p < 0.001). Asian or Pacific Islanders (AAPI) increased from 0.2 in 2013 to 0.5 in 2022 (AAPC: 12.13%, p = 0.002), and American Indians or Alaska Natives (AI/AN) from 1 in 2013 to 2.2 in 2022 (AAPC: 7.9%, p = 0.001). African Americans (AA) showed an insignificant change (0.3–0.5 per 100,000, AAPC: 0.7%, p = 0.498). Regarding age, individuals 45–64 saw AAMR rise from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100,000 (AAPC: 6.5%, p < 0.001), and those 65+ from 0.2 to 6 per 100,000 (AAPC: 16.5%, p < 0.001). No change was observed in the 25–44 age group (AAMR: 0.2 per 100,000, AAPC: 0.0%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: We report increased NAFLD-related mortality among both sexes and certain racial groups. The mortality rate increased for older populations, emphasizing the need for targeted public health measures and evidence-based interventions.

Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7–8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the best treatment approach depends on patient characteristics. Non-operative management (NOM), which involves the utilization of antibiotics and aggressive intravenous hydration, and surgical appendectomy are valid treatment options for healthy adults. NOM is also ideal for poor surgical candidates. Another important consideration is the timing of surgery, i.e., the role of interval appendectomy (IA) and the possibility of delaying surgery for a few hours on index admission. IA refers to surgical removal of the appendix 8–12 weeks after the initial diagnosis of appendicitis. It is ideal in patients with a contained appendiceal perforation on initial presentation, wherein an initial nonoperative approach is preferred. Furthermore, IA can help distinguish malignant and non-malignant causes of acute appendicitis, while reducing the risk of recurrence. On the contrary, a decision to delay appendectomy for a few hours on index admission should be made based on the patients’ baseline health status and severity of appendicitis. Post-operatively, surgical drain placement may help reduce postoperative complications; however, it carries an increased risk of drain occlusion, fistula formation, and paralytic ileus. Furthermore, one of the most critical aspects of appendectomy is the closure of the appendiceal stump, which can be achieved with the help of endoclips, sutures, staples, and endoloops. In this review, we discuss different aspects of management of acute appendicitis, current controversies in management, and the potential role of endoscopic appendectomy as a future treatment option.

Hassam Ali, Brandon Tedder, Syed Hamza Waqar, Rana Mohamed, Edward Lawson Cate, Eslam Ali. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022;26:235-43. https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.21-173

We examined trends in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD)–related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2022, focusing on sex, racial differences, and specific age groups. We analyzed age-adjusted mortality rates for ALD-related deaths using the CDC WONDER database and assessed differences between sex and racial groups. ALD-related mortality rates increased significantly between 1999 and 2022, with a more pronounced increase in females. White, Asian, Pacific Islander (AAPI), and American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) groups showed significant uptrends in ALD-related mortality, while African Americans (AA) experienced a nonsignificant decline. Age-specific trends revealed substantial increases in crude mortality rates across various age groups, with the largest increase observed in the younger age groups of 25–34 years, with an average percent change of 11.12% from 2006 to 2022 (average annual percent change of 7.1% for the study period), and 35–44 years, which showed an average percent change of 17.2% from 2018 to 2022 (average annual percent change of 3.8% for the study period). This study reveals increased ALD-related mortality rates in the United States from 1999 to 2022, with disparities among sex, racial groups, and younger age groups. Continued monitoring and evidence-based interventions are needed to address the growing burden of ALD-related mortality, particularly in the younger population. Export