Controlled human infection models (CHIMs) are invaluable tools utilized to understand the human response to infection, potentially leading to protective immune mechanisms and allowing efficacy testing of enteric countermeasures, including vaccines, antibiotics, and other products. The development of an improved Shigella CHIM for both Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri is consistent with international efforts, supported by international donors and the World Health Organization, focused on standardizing Shigella CHIMs and using them to accelerate Shigella vaccine development. The use of lyophilized Shigella challenge strains rather than plate-grown inoculum preparations is considered an important step forward in the standardization process. Furthermore, the results of studies such as this justify the development of lyophilized preparations for additional epidemiologically important S. flexneri serotypes, including S. flexneri 3a and S. flexneri 6.

Background. Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) is a principal cause of diarrhea in travelers, deployed military personnel, and children living in low to middle-income countries. ETEC expresses a variety of virulence factors including colonization factors (CF) that facilitate adherence to the intestinal mucosa. We assessed the protective efficacy of a tip-localized subunit of CF antigen I (CFA/I), CfaE, delivered intradermally with the mutant E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin, LTR192G, in a controlled human infection model (CHIM). Methods. Three cohorts of healthy adult subjects were enrolled and given three doses of 25 μg CfaE + 100 ng LTR192G vaccine intradermally at 3-week intervals. Approximately 28 days after the last vaccination, vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were admitted as inpatients and challenged with approximately 2 × 10⁷ cfu of CFA/I+ ETEC strain H10407 following an overnight fast. Subjects were assessed for moderate-to-severe diarrhea for 5 days post-challenge. Results. A total of 52 volunteers received all three vaccinations; 41 vaccinated and 43 unvaccinated subjects were challenged and assessed for moderate-to-severe diarrhea. Naïve attack rates varied from 45.5% to 64.7% across the cohorts yielding an overall efficacy estimate of 27.8% (95% confidence intervals: −7.5–51.6%). In addition to reducing moderate–severe diarrhea rates, the vaccine significantly reduced loose stool output and overall ETEC disease severity. Conclusions. This is the first study to demonstrate protection against ETEC challenge after intradermal vaccination with an ETEC adhesin. Further examination of the challenge methodology is necessary to address the variability in naïve attack rate observed among the three cohorts in the present study.

The efficacy of an Oral Whole Cell ETEC Vaccine (OEV) against Travelers’ Diarrhea (TD) was reexamined using novel outcome and immunologic measures. More specifically, a recently developed disease severity score and alternative clinical endpoints were evaluated as part of an initial validation effort to access the efficacy of a vaccine intervention for the first time in travelers to an ETEC endemic area. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial followed travelers to Guatemala or Mexico up to 28 days after arrival in the country following vaccination (two doses two weeks apart) with an ETEC vaccine. Fecal samples were collected upon arrival, departure, and during TD for pathogen identification. Serum was collected in a subset of subjects to determine IgA cholera toxin B subunit (CTB) antibody titers upon their arrival in the country. The ETEC vaccine’s efficacy, utilizing a TD severity score and other alternative endpoints, including the relationship between antibody levels and TD risk, was assessed and compared to the per-protocol primary efficacy endpoint. A total of 1435 subjects completed 7–28 days of follow-up and had available data. Vaccine efficacy was higher against more severe (≥5 unformed stools/24 h) ETEC-attributable TD and when accounting for immunologic take (PE ≥ 50%; p < 0.05). The vaccine protected against less severe (3 and 4 unformed stools/24 h) ETEC-attributable TD when accounting for symptom severity or change in activity (PE = 76.3%, p = 0.01). Immunologic take of the vaccine was associated with a reduced risk of infection with ETEC and other enteric pathogens, and with lower TD severity. Clear efficacy was observed among vaccinees with a TD score of ≥4 or ≥5, regardless of immunologic take (PE = 72.0% and 79.0%, respectively, p ≤ 0.03). The vaccine reduced the incidence and severity of ETEC, and this warrants accelerated evaluation of the improved formulation (designated ETVAX), currently undergoing advanced field testing. Subjects with serum IgA titers to CTB had a lower risk of infection with ETEC and Campylobacter jejuni/coli. Furthermore, the TD severity score provided a more robust descriptor of disease severity and should be included as an endpoint in future studies.

Travellers’ diarrhoea (TD) is the most common travel-related illness with an estimated 10 million people afflicted annually. Outcome measures to assess the efficacy of primary and secondary TD interventions were historically based on diarrhoea frequency with ≥1 associated gastrointestinal symptom. Furthermore, efficacy determination is often made on the presence or absence of TD, rather than on TD illness severity. Current severity classifications are based on subjective consideration of impact of illness on activity. We sought to develop a standardized scoring system to characterize TD severity to potentially apply as a secondary outcome in future field studies. Data on multiple signs and symptoms were obtained from a previously published multisite TD treatment trial conducted by the US Department of Defense (TrEAT TD). Correlation, regression and multiple correspondence analyses were performed to assess impact on activity and a TD severity score was established. Numerous signs and symptoms were associated with impaired function, with malaise and nausea most strongly associated [odds ratio (OR) 5.9–44.3, P < 0.0001 and OR 2.8–37.1, P < 0.0001, respectively). Based on co-varying symptomatology, a TD severity score accounting for diarrhoea frequency in addition to several signs and symptoms was a better predictor of negative impact on function than any single sign/symptom (X² = 127.16, P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the mean TD severity score between those with acute watery diarrhoea (3.9 ± 1.9) and those with dysentery or acute febrile illness (6.2 ± 2.0). The newly developed disease severity score better predicted a negative impact on activity due to TD than did any single sign or symptom. Incorporating multiple parameters into the TD severity score better captures illness severity and moves the field towards current recommendations for TD management by considering symptoms with high functional impact. Further validation of this score is needed in non-military travellers and other settings.

Background: Enteric disease caused by Shigella, Campylobacter, and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) represents a significant global health burden, particularly among children in low-resource settings. However, no licensed vaccines are currently available for these bacterial pathogens. Given the wide range of enteric pathogens and the constraints posed by an increasingly crowded infant immunization schedule, the development of combination vaccines or combined administration of individual oral vaccines may offer a practical approach to address this unmet need. Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the combined administration of two multicomponent oral vaccine candidates: ETVAX, targeting ETEC, and a trivalent whole-cell vaccine targeting Shigella. Methods: The vaccine candidates were administered orally in mice, both individually and in combination, with and without the inclusion of the double-mutant heat-labile toxin (dmLT) adjuvant. Results: The results demonstrated systemic and intestinal-mucosal immune responses to the key protective antigens following both individual and combined vaccine administration. Importantly, the combination of the two vaccines did not compromise the elicitation of specific antibody responses. The inclusion of dmLT as an adjuvant significantly enhanced immune responses to several antigens, highlighting its potential to improve vaccine efficacy. Conclusions: These findings underscore the feasibility of combining ETEC and Shigella vaccine candidates into a single formulation without compromising immunogenicity. This combined approach has the potential to provide broad protective coverage, thereby mitigating the global impact of enteric diseases and streamlining vaccine delivery within existing childhood immunization programs. Our results support further development of this combination vaccine strategy as a promising tool in combating enteric infections and improving health outcomes, particularly among young children in endemic regions who are vulnerable to enteric disease.

Background: Shigella infections remain endemic in places with poor sanitation and are a leading cause of diarrheal mortality globally, as well as a major contributor to gut enteropathy and stunting. There are currently no licensed vaccines for shigellosis but it has been estimated that an effective vaccine could avert 590,000 deaths over a 20-year period. A challenge to effective Shigella vaccine development has been the low immunogenicity and protective efficacy of candidate Shigella vaccines in infants and young children. Additionally, a new vaccine might be less immunogenic in a highly endemic setting compared to a low endemic setting (“vaccine hyporesponsiveness”). The use of a potent adjuvant enhancing both mucosal and systemic immunity might overcome these problems. Invaplex_AR-Detox is an injectable Shigella vaccine that uses a novel combination of conserved invasion plasmid antigen proteins and a serotype-specific bacterial lipopolysaccharide attenuated for safe intramuscular administration. The adjuvant dmLT has been shown to enhance Shigella immune responses in mice, has safely been administered intramuscularly, and was shown to enhance immune responses in healthy volunteers when given in combination with other antigens in phase I trials. This article describes the protocol of a study that will be the first to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of Invaplex_AR-Detox co-administered with dmLT in healthy adults in low-endemic and high-endemic settings. Methods: In a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled dose-escalation phase Ia/b trial, the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of three intramuscular vaccinations administered 4 weeks apart with 2.5 µg or 10 µg of Invaplex_AR-Detox vaccine, alone or in combination with 0.1 µg of the dmLT adjuvant, will first be assessed in a total of 50 healthy Dutch adults (phase Ia) and subsequently in 35 healthy Zambian adults (phase Ib) aged 18–50 years. The primary outcome is safety, and secondary outcomes are humoral and cellular immune responses to the adjuvanted or non-adjuvanted vaccine. Discussion: This trial is part of the ShigaPlexIM project that aims to advance the early clinical development of an injectable Shigella vaccine and to make the vaccine available for late-stage clinical development. This trial addresses the issue of hyporesponsiveness in an early stage of clinical development by testing the vaccine and adjuvant in an endemic setting (Zambia) after the first-in-human administration and the dose-escalation has proven safe and tolerable in a low-endemic setting (Netherlands). Besides strengthening the vaccine pipeline against a major diarrheal disease, another goal of the ShigaPlexIM project is to stimulate capacity building and strengthen global North-South relations in clinical research. Trial registration: EU CT number: 2023-506394-35-02, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05961059.