Fractional dosing can be a cost-effective vaccination strategy to accelerate individual and herd immunity in a pandemic. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of primary intradermal (ID) vaccination, with a 1/5th dose compared with the standard intramuscular (IM) dose of mRNA-1273 in SARS-CoV-2 naïve persons. We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands between June and December 2021. One hundred and fifty healthy and SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants, aged 18–30 years, were randomized (1:1:1) to receive either two doses of 20 µg mRNA-1273 ID with a standard needle (SN) or the Bella-mu® needle (BM), or two doses of 100 µg IM, 28 days apart. The primary outcome was non-inferiority in seroconversion rates at day 43 (D43), defined as a neutralizing antibody concentration threshold of 465 IU/mL, the lowest response in the IM group. The non-inferiority margin was set at −15%. Neutralizing antibody concentrations at D43 were 1789 (95% CI: 1488–2150) in the IM and 1263 (951–1676) and 1295 (1020–1645) in the ID-SN and ID-BM groups, respectively. The absolute difference in seroconversion proportion between fractional and standard-dose groups was −13.95% (−24.31 to −3.60) for the ID-SN and −13.04% (−22.78 to −3.31) for the ID-BM group and exceeded the predefined non-inferiority margin. Although ID vaccination with 1/5th dose of mRNA-1273 did not meet the predefined non-inferior criteria, the neutralizing antibody concentrations in these groups are far above the proposed proxy for protection against severe disease (100 IU/mL), justifying this strategy in times of vaccine scarcity to accelerate mass protection against severe disease.

Malaria vaccines consisting of metabolically active Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) sporozoites can offer improved protection compared with currently deployed subunit vaccines. In a previous study, we demonstrated the superior protective efficacy of a three-dose regimen of late-arresting genetically attenuated parasites administered by mosquito bite (GA2-MB) compared with early-arresting counterparts (GA1-MB) against a homologous controlled human malaria infection. Encouraged by these results, we explored the potency of a single GA2-MB immunization in a placebo-controlled randomized trial. Primary outcomes were safety and tolerability, time-to-parasitemia and protective efficacy. Humoral and cellular immunological results were considered secondary outcomes. Here we report the safe administration of GA2-MB with no breakthrough malaria and sterile protection in nine of ten participants at 6 weeks after a single immunization with 50 GA2-infected mosquitoes, compared with none of five mock-immunized participants, against a homologous controlled human malaria infection. Immunization increased circulating Pf-specific polyfunctional effector memory CD4⁺ T cells coexpressing tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-2. This unprecedented 90% protective efficacy after a single low-dose immunization holds great promise for the potency of GA2 immunization. Future studies should demonstrate whether GA2 is similarly efficacious in pre-exposed populations and whether the favorable safety profile reported here holds up in larger groups. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT05468606.

The aim of this study was to assess safety and immunogenicity of a dose-sparing fractional intradermal (ID) booster strategy with the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. COVID-19 naive adults aged 18-30 years were recruited from a previous study on primary vaccination regimens that compared 20 μg ID vaccinations with 100 μg IM vaccinations with mRNA-1273 as the primary vaccination series. Participants previously immunized with ID regimens were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a fractional ID booster dose (20 μg) or the standard-of-care intramuscular (IM) booster dose (50 μg) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, six months after completing their primary series (ID-ID and ID-IM group, respectively). Participants that had received a full dose IM regimen as the primary series, received the IM standard-of-care booster dose (IM-IM group). Additionally, COVID-19 naive individuals aged 18-40 years that had received an IM mRNA vaccine as the primary series were recruited from the general population to receive a fractional ID booster dose (IM-ID group). Immunogenicity was assessed using IgG anti-spike antibody responses and neutralizing capacity against SARS-CoV-2. Cellular immune responses were measured in a sub-group. Safety and tolerability were monitored. In January 2022, 129 participants were included. Fractional ID boosting was safe and well-tolerated, with fewer systemic adverse events compared to IM boosting. At day 28 post-booster, anti-spike S1 IgG geometric mean concentrations were 9,106 (95% CI: 7,150-11,597) binding antibody units (BAU)/mL in the IM-IM group and 4,357 (3,003-6,322) BAU/mL, 6,629 (4,913-8,946) BAU/mL, and 5,264 (4,032-6,873) BAU/mL in the ID-IM, ID-ID, and IM-ID groups, respectively. ID boosting provides robust immune responses and is a viable dose-sparing strategy for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The favorable side-effect profile supports its potential in reducing vaccine hesitancy. Fractional dosing strategies should be considered early in the clinical development of future mRNA vaccines to enhance vaccine availability and pandemic preparedness.

BACKGROUND: Partial protective immunity to schistosomiasis develops over time, following repeated praziquantel (PZQ) treatment. Moreover, animals develop protective immunity after repeated immunization with irradiated cercariae. Here, we evaluated the development of natural immunity through consecutive exposure-treatment cycles with Schistosoma mansoni in healthy, Schistosoma -naive participants using single-sex, controlled human S. mansoni infection. METHODS: Twenty-four participants were randomized in a double-blinded (1:1) manner to either the reinfection group, which received 3 exposures (weeks 0, 9, and 18) to 20 male cercariae, or to the infection control group, which received 2 mock exposures with water (weeks 0 and 9) prior to cercariae exposure (week 18). Participants were treated with PZQ (or placebo) at weeks 8, 17, and 30. Attack rates (ARs) after the final exposure (weeks 19–30) using serum circulating anodic antigen (CAA) positivity were compared between groups. Adverse events (AEs) were collected for safety. RESULTS: Twenty-three participants completed the follow-up. No protective efficacy was observed, given an 82% (9 of 11) AR after the final exposure in the reinfection group and 92% (11 of 12) in the infection control group (protective efficacy 11%; 95% CI –24% to 35%; P = 0.5). Related AEs were higher after the first infection (45%) compared with the second (27%) and third (28%) infections. Severe acute schistosomiasis was observed after the first infections only (2 of 12 in the reinfection group and 2 of 12 in the infection control group). CONCLUSION: Repeated Schistosoma exposure and treatment cycles resulted in apparent clinical tolerance, with fewer symptoms reported following subsequent infections, but did not result in protection against reinfection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05085470. FUNDING: European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant (no. 101075876).

Background There is an urgent need for fair and equitable access to safe and effective vaccines to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Shortages in reagents and vaccines are a major challenge, as well as limited knowledge on dose response relationship with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We explored intradermal fractional dose administration of a mRNA SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccine as a potential dose-sparing strategy. Methods We conducted a proof-of-concept, dose-escalation, open-label, randomised-controlled vaccine trial (IDSCOVA) in healthy adults aged 18-30 years. To test initial safety, ten participants received 10 µg mRNA-1273 vaccine through intradermal injection at day 1 and 29. Following a favourable safety review, thirty participants were 1:1 randomised to receive 20 µg mRNA-1273 either intradermally or intramuscularly. The primary endpoint was tolerability and safety. The secondary endpoint was seroconversion and specific IgG concentration against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 and Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) after the second dose at day 43. We compared results to two historical cohorts of non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals. Findings Thirty-eight of forty included participants (median age 25 years) completed the study. There were no serious adverse events. Self-reported local adverse reactions after intradermal delivery were mild, both in the 10 µg and the 20 µg group. In the higher dose group, systemic adverse reactions were more common, but still well tolerated. All 38 participants mounted substantially higher IgG-anti-S1 and IgG-anti-RBD concentrations at day 43 than COVID-19 controls. At day 43, anti-S1 (95% CI) was 1,696 (1,309-2,198) BAU/mL for the 10 µg intradermal group, 1,406 (953·5-2,074) BAU/mL for the 20 µg intramuscular group and 2,057 (1,421-2,975) BAU/mL for the 20 µg intradermal group. Anti-S1 was 107·2 (63-182·2) BAU/mL for the convalescent plasma control group and 1,558 (547·8-4,433) BAU/mL for the individuals vaccinated with 100 µg mRNA-1273. Interpretation Intradermal administration of 10 µg and 20 µg mRNA-1273 vaccine was well tolerated and safe, and resulted in a robust antibody response. Intradermal vaccination has the potential to be deployed for vaccine dose-sparing. Funding The trial was supported by crowdfunding (Wake Up to Corona).