Mohammad Bagherbandi

Prof. Mohammad Bagherbandi

University of Gävle and Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2011 in Acta Geophysica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLars Sjöberg
Lars Sjöberg
MBMohammad Bagherbandi
Mohammad Bagherbandi

1 March 2011 in Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Hungarica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mehdi EshaghMehdi Eshagh
Mehdi Eshagh
MBMohammad Bagherbandi
Mohammad Bagherbandi
LSLars Sjöberg
Lars Sjöberg
The Moho depth can be determined using seismic and/or gravimetric methods. These methods will not yield the same result as they are based on different hypotheses as well as different types, qualities and distributions of data. Here we present a new global model for the Moho computed based on a stochastic combination of seismic and gravimetric Moho models. This method employs condition equations in the spectral domain for the seismic and gravimetric models as well as degree-order variance component estimation to optimally weight the corresponding harmonics in the combination. The preliminary data for the modelling are the seismic model CRUST2.0 and a new gravimetric Moho model based on the inverse solution of the Vening Meinez-Moritz isostatic hypothesis and the global Earth Gravitational Model EGM08. Numerical results show that this method of stochastic combination agrees better with the seismic Moho model (3.6 km rms difference) than the gravimetric one. The model should be a candidate for dandifying the frequently sparsely data CRUST2.0. We expect that this way of combining seismic and gravimetric data would be even more fruitful in a regional study.


1 September 2011 in Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMohammad Bagherbandi
Mohammad Bagherbandi
LSLars Sjöberg
Lars Sjöberg

2 June 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNureldin Gido
Nureldin Gido
HAHadi Amin
Hadi Amin
MBMohammad Bagherbandi
Mohammad Bagherbandi
Faramarz NilfouroushanFaramarz Nilfouroushan
Faramarz Nilfouroushan
Monitoring environmental hazards, owing to natural and anthropogenic causes, is an important issue, which requires proper data, models, and cross-validation of the results. The geodetic satellite missions, for example, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and Sentinel-1, are very useful in this respect. GRACE missions are dedicated to modeling the temporal variations of the Earth’s gravity field and mass transportation in the Earth’s surface, whereas Sentinel-1 collects synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data, which enables us to measure the ground movements accurately. Extraction of large volumes of water and oil decreases the reservoir pressure and form compaction and, consequently, land subsidence occurs, which can be analyzed by both GRACE and Sentinel-1 data. In this paper, large-scale groundwater storage (GWS) changes are studied using the GRACE monthly gravity field models together with different hydrological models over the major oil reservoirs in Sudan, that is, Heglig, Bamboo, Neem, Diffra, and Unity-area oil fields. Then, we correlate the results with the available oil wells production data for the period of 2003–2012. In addition, using the only freely available Sentinel-1 data, collected between November 2015 and April 2019, the ground surface deformation associated with this oil and water depletion is studied. Owing to the lack of terrestrial geodetic monitoring data in Sudan, the use of GRACE and Sentinel-1 satellite data is very valuable to monitor water and oil storage changes and their associated land subsidence over our region of interest. Our results show that there is a significant correlation between the GRACE-based GWS anomalies (ΔGWS) and extracted oil and water volumes. The trend of ΔGWS changes due to water and oil depletion ranged from –18.5 ± 6.3 to –6.2 ± 1.3 mm/year using the CSR GRACE monthly solutions and the best tested hydrological model in this study. Moreover, our Sentinel-1 SAR data analysis using the persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI) method shows a high rate of subsidence, that is, –24.5 ± 0.85, –23.8 ± 0.96, –14.2 ± 0.85, and –6 ± 0.88 mm/year over Heglig, Neem, Diffra, and Unity-area oil fields, respectively. The results of this study can help us to control the integrity and safety of operations and infrastructure in that region, as well as to study the groundwater/oil storage behavior.

13 August 2022 in Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMohammad Bagherbandi
Mohammad Bagherbandi
HAHadi Amin
Hadi Amin
LWLinsong Wang
Linsong Wang
MSMasoud Shirazian
Masoud Shirazian
The Earth's mass redistribution due to deglaciation and recent ice sheet melting causes changes in the Earth's gravity field and vertical land motion in Greenland. The changes are because of ongoing mass redistribution and related elastic (on a short time scale) and viscoelastic (on time scales of a few thousands of years) responses. These signatures can be used to determine the mantle viscosity. In this study, we infer the mantle viscosity associated with the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) and long‐wavelength geoid beneath the Greenland lithosphere. The viscosity is determined based on a spatio‐spectral analysis of the Earth's gravity field and the land uplift rate in order to find the GIA‐related gravity field. We used different land uplift data, that is, the vertical land motions obtained by the Greenland Global Positioning System (GPS) Network (GNET), gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) data, and also combined them using the Kalman filtering technique. Using different land uplift rates, one can obtain different GIA‐related gravity fields. As shown in this study, the mantle viscosities of 1.9 × 1022 Pa s and 7.8 × 1021 Pa s for a depth of 200–700 km are obtained using ICE‐6G (VM5a) model and the combined land uplift model, respectively, and the GIA‐related gravity potential signal.