Matthew Dankner

Dr. Matthew Dankner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2018 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMatthew Dankner
Matthew Dankner
ARApril A. N. Rose
April A. N. Rose
SRShivshankari Rajkumar
Shivshankari Rajkumar
PSPeter Siegel
Peter Siegel
IWIan R. Watson
Ian R. Watson

15 April 2022 in Science Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DMDan Moldoveanu
Dan Moldoveanu
LRLeeAnn Ramsay
LeeAnn Ramsay
MLMathieu Lajoie
Mathieu Lajoie
LALuke Anderson-Trocme
Luke Anderson-Trocme
MLMarine Lingrand
Marine Lingrand
IWIan R. Watson
Ian R. Watson
Melanoma is an immunogenic cancer with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It harbors a high mutation burden compared with other cancers and, as a result, has abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within its microenvironment. However, understanding the complex interplay between the stroma, tumor cells, and distinct TIL subsets remains a substantial challenge in immune oncology. To properly study this interplay, quantifying spatial relationships of multiple cell types within the tumor microenvironment is crucial. To address this, we used cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to simultaneously quantify the expression of 35 protein markers, characterizing the microenvironment of 5 benign nevi and 67 melanomas. We profiled more than 220,000 individual cells to identify melanoma, lymphocyte subsets, macrophage/monocyte, and stromal cell populations, allowing for in-depth spatial quantification of the melanoma microenvironment. We found that within pretreatment melanomas, the abundance of proliferating antigen-experienced cytotoxic T cells (CD8 + CD45RO + Ki67 + ) and the proximity of antigen-experienced cytotoxic T cells to melanoma cells were associated with positive response to ICIs. Our study highlights the potential of multiplexed single-cell technology to quantify spatial cell-cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment to understand immune therapy responses.

16 May 2017 in OncoImmunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMatthew Dankner
Matthew Dankner
SGScott Gray-Owen
Scott Gray-Owen
YHYu-Hwa Huang
Yu-Hwa Huang
RBRichard S. Blumberg
Richard S. Blumberg
NBNicole Beauchemin
Nicole Beauchemin
CEACAM1 is an extensively studied cell surface molecule with established functions in multiple cancer types, as well as in various compartments of the immune system. Due to its multi-faceted role as a recently appreciated immune checkpoint inhibitor and tumor marker, CEACAM1 is an attractive target for cancer immunotherapy. Herein, we highlight CEACAM1's function in various immune compartments and cancer types, including in the context of metastatic disease. This review outlines CEACAM1's role as a therapeutic target for cancer treatment in light of these properties.

13 December 2018 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMatthew Dankner
Matthew Dankner
MLMathieu Lajoie
Mathieu Lajoie
DMDan Moldoveanu
Dan Moldoveanu
TNTan-Trieu Nguyen
Tan-Trieu Nguyen
PSPaul Savage
Paul Savage
ARApril Rose
April Rose
Purpose: Dual MAPK pathway inhibition (dMAPKi) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors improves survival in BRAF V600E/K mutant melanoma, but the efficacy of dMAPKi in non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors is poorly understood. We sought to characterize the responsiveness of class II (enhanced kinase activity, dimerization dependent) BRAF mutant melanoma to dMAPKi. Experimental Design: Tumors from patients with BRAF wild-type (WT), V600E (class I), and L597S (class II) metastatic melanoma were used to generate patient-derived xenografts (PDX). We assembled a panel of melanoma cell lines with class IIa (activation segment) or IIb (p-loop) mutations and compared these with WT or V600E/K BRAF mutant cells. Cell lines and PDXs were treated with BRAFi (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, and LY3009120), MEKi (cobimetinib, trametinib, and binimetinib), or the combination. We identified 2 patients with BRAF L597S metastatic melanoma who were treated with dMAPKi. Results: BRAFi impaired MAPK signaling and cell growth in class I and II BRAF mutant cells. dMAPKi was more effective than either single MAPKi at inhibiting cell growth in all class II BRAF mutant cells tested. dMAPKi caused tumor regression in two melanoma PDXs with class II BRAF mutations and prolonged survival of mice with class II BRAF mutant melanoma brain metastases. Two patients with BRAF L597S mutant melanoma clinically responded to dMAPKi. Conclusions: Class II BRAF mutant melanoma is growth inhibited by dMAPKi. Responses to dMAPKi have been observed in 2 patients with class II BRAF mutant melanoma. These data provide rationale for clinical investigation of dMAPKi in patients with class II BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res; 1–12. ©2018 AACR.

1 August 2022 in JCO Precision Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMatthew Dankner
Matthew Dankner
YWYifan Wang
Yifan Wang
RFRouhi Fazelzad
Rouhi Fazelzad
BJBenny Johnson
Benny Johnson
CNCaroline A. Nebhan
Caroline A. Nebhan
ARApril A. N. Rose
April A. N. Rose
PURPOSE: Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified into three classes according to molecular characteristics. Consensus treatment strategies for class 2 and 3 BRAF mutations have not yet been established.METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with published reports of individual patients with cancer harboring class 2 or 3 BRAF mutations from 2010 to 2021, to assess treatment outcomes with US Food and Drug Administration–approved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy (MAPK TT) according to BRAF class, cancer type, and MAPK TT type. Coprimary outcomes were response rate and progression-free survival.RESULTS: A total of 18,167 studies were screened, identifying 80 studies with 238 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 167 patients with class 2 and 71 patients with class 3 BRAF mutations. Overall, 77 patients achieved a treatment response. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, response rate and progression-free survival were higher among patients with class 2 compared with class 3 mutations, findings that remain when analyses are restricted to patients with melanoma or lung primary cancers. MEK ± BRAF inhibitors demonstrated greater clinical activity in class 2 compared with class 3 BRAF-mutant tumors than BRAF or EGFR inhibitors.CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that MAPK TTs have clinical activity in some class 2 and 3 BRAF-mutant cancers. BRAF class may dictate responsiveness to current and emerging treatment strategies, particularly in melanoma and lung cancers. Together, this analysis provides clinical validation of predictions made on the basis of a mutation classification system established in the preclinical literature. Further evaluation with prospective clinical trials is needed for this population.

12 January 2021 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMatthew Dankner
Matthew Dankner
MCMaxime Caron
Maxime Caron
TATariq D Al-Saadi
Tariq D Al-Saadi
WYWenQing Yu
WenQing Yu
VOVeronique Ouellet
Veronique Ouellet
PSPeter Siegel
Peter Siegel
Background: Sixty percent of surgically resected brain metastases (BrM) recur within 1 year. These recurrences have long been thought to result from the dispersion of cancer cells during surgery. We tested the alternative hypothesis that invasion of cancer cells into the adjacent brain plays a significant role in local recurrence and shortened overall survival. Methods: We determined the invasion pattern of 164 surgically resected BrM and correlated with local recurrence and overall survival. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) of >15,000 cells from BrM and adjacent brain tissue. Validation of targets was performed with a novel cohort of BrM patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and patient tissues. Results: We demonstrate that invasion of metastatic cancer cells into the adjacent brain is associated with local recurrence and shortened overall survival. scRNAseq of paired tumor and adjacent brain samples confirmed the existence of invasive cancer cells in the tumor-adjacent brain. Analysis of these cells identified cold-inducible RNA-binding protein (CIRBP) overexpression in invasive cancer cells compared to cancer cells located within the metastases. Applying PDX models that recapitulate the invasion pattern observed in patients, we show that CIRBP is overexpressed in highly invasive BrM and is required for efficient invasive growth in the brain. Conclusions: These data demonstrate peritumoral invasion as a driver of treatment failure in BrM that is functionally mediated by CIRBP. These findings improve our understanding of the biology underlying postoperative treatment failure and lay the groundwork for rational clinical trial development based upon invasion pattern in surgically resected BrM.