Aud Elisabeth Witsø

Dr. Aud Elisabeth Witsø

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2017 in Disability & Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAnita Gjermestad
Anita Gjermestad
LLLaila Luteberget
Laila Luteberget
TMTurid Midjo
Turid Midjo
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
This article presents a systematic review of studies published between November 2010 and November 2014 about the everyday life of adults with intellectual disability as viewed from their own perspective. Everyday life refers to an interdisciplinary concept including approaches attentive to the mundane and to ordinary routines of social relations and practices. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. The review was carried out as an interpretive synthesis. Findings from the included studies revealed neglect of participation regarding the wishes, self-determination, choice and control of persons with intellectual disability in their everyday lives. This neglect demonstrates the limitations persons with intellectual disability face as agents and adult citizens in their everyday life, and shows violation of fundamental human rights.

15 May 2018 in Journal of Intellectual Disabilities
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
BHBrit Hauger
Brit Hauger
This study illuminates how adults with intellectual disabilities understand and describe their everyday life and its shortcomings when it comes to equal rights in the context of Norwegian community living. An inclusive research design, including nine persons with mild intellectual disability, two university researchers and two intellectual disability nurses from the municipality, was undertaken. An inductive thematic analysis of data identified three key themes: everyday life – context, rhythm and structure, social participation and staff – an ambiguous part of everyday life. Results show that service provision had institutional qualities; participants experienced lack of information and reduced possibilities for social inclusion and community participation like everyone else. More attention on the role of policy development, support staff and leadership, in relation to facilitating an everyday life with more user involvement, social inclusion and community participation of people needing support, is essential. Participatory, appreciative, action and reflection in workshops for persons with intellectual disabilities and support staff represent a promising approach to promote the voices and interests of persons with intellectual disabilities. This article tells you about the everyday life of people with intellectual disabilities living in Norway. Nine people with intellectual disabilities worked together with two university researchers and two intellectual disability nurses in the community, in workshops. The people with intellectual disabilities liked to have their own apartment and going to work every day. They said that they wanted more social participation with friends and more participation in activities in the community, just like everyone else. They wanted to be treated with more respect by their staff. All participants in the project saw great value in working together and some of them are working together in a new project about involvement in the improvement of support services for people with intellectual disabilities.

3 July 2023 in International Journal of Inclusive Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAnita Blakstad Bjørnerås
Anita Blakstad Bjørnerås
ELEli Langørgen
Eli Langørgen
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
LKLisbeth Kvam
Lisbeth Kvam
ALAnn-Elén Leithaug
Ann-Elén Leithaug
SHSissel Horghagen
Sissel Horghagen

30 June 2022 in Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OROmid Rasouli
Omid Rasouli
VHVigdis Schnell Husby
Vigdis Schnell Husby
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
MRMonica Røstad
Monica Røstad
SASynnøve Aasan
Synnøve Aasan
LKLisbeth Kvam
Lisbeth Kvam
Little is known about how welfare technology (WT) is used in welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities. This study aimed to explore expectations, experiences, and challenges concer...

7 March 2024 in Social Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TRTone Ristad
Tone Ristad
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
SHSissel Horghagen
Sissel Horghagen
LKLisbeth Kvam
Lisbeth Kvam
Jørn ØstvikJørn Østvik
Jørn Østvik
Including students with disabilities in higher education is a global political objective and is considered a human right. However, many students do not feel included and hesitate to ask for the help they need to succeed in their education. This study aims to investigate the processes of requesting accommodation for students with disabilities in higher education from the perspectives of both students and support providers. Six co-creation workshops were held, with a total of 46 participants from various backgrounds relevant to exploring pathways for students with disabilities in higher education and into the workforce. The audio recordings of the workshops were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to identify and explore processes. Three interconnected processes were identified: determining whether to disclose, asking for accommodations, and studying disability. The analysis showed that these processes could be time-consuming and riddled with barriers, and they did not always result in granted accommodations. Some students ended up using their study time to research their disability and potential accommodations instead of studying their subject matter. To eliminate barriers and promote disclosure, universities should ensure a universally designed education and that staff have the necessary knowledge to assist students in obtaining accommodations.

29 June 2022 in International Journal of Disability, Development and Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ABAnita Blakstad Bjørnerås
Anita Blakstad Bjørnerås
AWAud Elisabeth Witsø
Aud Elisabeth Witsø
LKLisbeth Kvam
Lisbeth Kvam
AEArne Henning Eide
Arne Henning Eide
LJLisbeth Jahren
Lisbeth Jahren
SHSissel Horghagen
Sissel Horghagen
Succeeding at university can be a complex matter, and the barriers are manifold for students with disabilities (SwDs). Accommodations are available for those with needs, but these alone do not meet the political goals of inclusive educations. Student ambassadors act as experienced representatives on campuses, supporting others and gaining individual benefits themselves. Approaches building on SwDs’ experiences and capacities can be a means to overcome the complex barriers often faced throughout education. This scoping review aimed to map research on student ambassador interventions for SwDs in higher education and identify the interventions’ key concepts. The result will inform an ambassador intervention in higher education. Six electronic databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles of any design published between 2010 and December 2020. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. A thematic synthesis resulted in three key concepts: peer guidance and supportive relationships; building strategies and transferable skills; and advocating for change. However, no program utilises exclusively students with disabilities in ambassador roles. The results indicate a lack of research as well as awareness on the unexplored potential of actively involving SwDs in ambassador roles.