Including students with disabilities in higher education is a global political objective and is considered a human right. However, many students do not feel included and hesitate to ask for the help they need to succeed in their education. This study aims to investigate the processes of requesting accommodation for students with disabilities in higher education from the perspectives of both students and support providers. Six co-creation workshops were held, with a total of 46 participants from various backgrounds relevant to exploring pathways for students with disabilities in higher education and into the workforce. The audio recordings of the workshops were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to identify and explore processes. Three interconnected processes were identified: determining whether to disclose, asking for accommodations, and studying disability. The analysis showed that these processes could be time-consuming and riddled with barriers, and they did not always result in granted accommodations. Some students ended up using their study time to research their disability and potential accommodations instead of studying their subject matter. To eliminate barriers and promote disclosure, universities should ensure a universally designed education and that staff have the necessary knowledge to assist students in obtaining accommodations.

Despite the known benefits of workforce participation, many individuals with disabilities remain excluded. This exploratory study utilises selected analytical tools from constructivist grounded theory to investigate how 46 diverse stakeholders perceive disability during the transition from higher education to employment. Additionally, it examines how these perceptions influence efforts toward inclusion and the advice given regarding disability disclosure. Six workshops were conducted to facilitate dialogue on pathways to work for students with disabilities. The constructivist approach to analysis leads to the development of several concepts that capture stakeholders’ perspectives on disability, their strategies for promoting inclusion, and their recommendations regarding disclosure. Disabilities are conceptualised as an asset, a liability, or as insignificant. The views of disability as an asset or a liability influence advocacy strategies and disclosure recommendations, ranging from celebrating to concealing. These attitudes also shape how individuals who disclose disabilities are perceived. Society often expects people with disabilities to disclose their conditions to promote inclusion, even though performing such can involve risks like stigma and exclusion. At the same time, employers share responsibility for creating inclusive environments through universal design and supportive practices. The findings show that both disclosure and concealment can lead to inclusion or exclusion, emphasising the importance of universally designed institutions.