Disease-modifying treatments have transformed the natural history of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), but the cellular pathways altered by SMN restoration remain undefined and biomarkers cannot yet precisely predict treatment response. We performed an exploratory cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomic study in a diverse sample of SMA patients treated with nusinersen to elucidate therapeutic pathways and identify predictors of motor improvement. Proteomic analyses were performed on CSF samples collected before treatment (T0) and at 6 months (T6) using an Olink panel to quantify 1113 peptides. A supervised machine learning approach was used to identify proteins that discriminated patients who improved functionally from those who did not after 2 years of treatment. A total of 49 SMA patients were included (10 type 1, 18 type 2, and 21 type 3), ranging in age from 3 months to 65 years. Most proteins showed a decrease in CSF concentration at T6. The machine learning algorithm identified ARSB, ENTPD2, NEFL, and IFI30 as the proteins most predictive of improvement. The machine learning model was able to predict motor improvement at 2 years with 79.6% accuracy. The results highlight the potential application of CSF biomarkers to predict motor improvement following SMA treatment. Validation in larger datasets is needed.

Background and Objective: Patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) are often classified as responders or non-responders based on the attainment of a specific improvement threshold on validated functional scales. This categorization may significantly impact treatment reimbursement in some countries. The aim of this research is to evaluate the perception of treatments and their benefit by patients considered as responders or non-responders. Methods: In this non-commercial multicenter study, 99 post-symptomatically treated SMA type I–III patients with a median age of 11.2 (0.39–57.4) years at treatment initiation were stratified into three groups based on their treatment outcomes, i.e., those exhibiting clinically significant improvement (N = 41), those with non-clinically significant improvement (N = 18), or those showing no improvement (N = 40). Fifteen months after treatment, the initiation patients or patients’ caregivers were assessed using a patient-rated scoring system based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, comprising 22 questions targeting important aspects and tasks in the daily life of patients with SMA. Results: We found no statistical difference in the patient perception of treatment benefits in 17 out of 22 domains across patient groups. Conclusions: Our results suggest that functional motor scales do not recapitulate patients’ and patients’ caregivers’ experience of the effect of nusinersen treatment in SMA.

Assessing endurance in non-ambulatory individuals with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) has been challenging due to limited evaluation tools. The Assisted 6-Minute Cycling Test (A6MCT) is an upper limb ergometer assessment used in other neurologic disorders to measure endurance. To study the performance of the A6MCT in the non-ambulatory SMA population, prospective data was collected on 38 individuals with SMA (13 sitters; 25 non-sitters), aged 5 to 74 years (mean = 30.3; SD = 14.1). The clinical measures used were A6MCT, Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), Adapted Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (ATEND), and Egen Klassifikation Scale 2 (EK2). Perceived fatigue was assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and effort was assessed using the Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Data were analyzed for: (1) Feasibility, (2) Clinical discrimination, and (3) Associations between A6MCT with clinical characteristics and outcomes. Results showed the A6MCT was feasible for 95% of the tested subjects, discriminated between functional groups (p = 0.0086), and was significantly associated with results obtained from RULM, ATEND, EK2, and Brooke (p < 0.0001; p = 0.029; p < 0.001; p = 0.005). These findings indicate the A6MCT’s potential to evaluate muscular endurance in non-ambulatory SMA individuals, complementing clinician-rated assessments. Nevertheless, further validation with a larger dataset is needed for broader application.

Background: Individuals with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) have low physical activity levels and an increased risk of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. Respiratory gas kinetics obtained during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) may provide valuable insights into disease mechanisms and cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with NMD. Recovery from exercise is an important marker of exercise performance and overall physical health, and impaired recovery is strongly associated with poor health outcomes. This study evaluates recovery metrics in individuals with NMD after performing maximal exertion during CPET. Methods: A total of 34 individuals with NMD and 15 healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. CPET was performed using a wearable metabolic system and a wheelchair-accessible total body trainer to peak exertion. Recovery metrics assessed were (i) the time to reach 50% O₂ recovery compared with peak exercise and (ii) the ratios of ventilation and respiratory gases between peak exercise and the highest values observed during recovery (overshoot). Results: The NMD group had a significantly longer time to reach 50% O₂ recovery (T1/2 VO₂: 105 ± 43.4 vs. 76 ± 36.4 s, p = 0.02), lower respiratory overshoot (17.1 ± 13.0% vs. 28.8 ± 9.03%), and lower ventilation/VO₂ (31.9 ± 28.3 vs. 52.2 ± 23.5) compared to the control group. Conclusions: This study observes significantly impaired recovery metrics following peak exercise in individuals with NMD compared to controls. These insights may improve the understanding of exercise recovery and mechanics, thus improving prognostication and optimizing exercise prescriptions for individuals with NMD.

Background and Objective: Patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treated with a dis-ease-modifying therapy (DMT) are often classified as responders or non-responders based on at-tainment of a specific improvement threshold on validated functional scales. This categorization may significantly impact treatment reimbursement in some countries. The aim of this research is to evaluate the perception of treatment benefit by patients considered as responder or non-responder. Methods: In this non-commercial multicenter study, 99 post-symptomatically treated SMA type I-III patients with a median age of 11.2 (0.39-57.4) years at treatment initiation were stratified into three groups based on their treatment outcomes, i.e. those exhibiting clinically significant improvement (N=41), those with non-clinically significant improvement (N=18), or those show-ing no improvement (N=40). Fifteen months after treatment initiation patients or patients’ care-givers were assessed using a patient-rated scoring system based on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, comprising 22 questions targeting important aspects and tasks in the daily life of patients with SMA. Results: We found no statistical difference in patient perception of treatment benefit in 17 out of 22 domains across patient groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that functional motor scales do not recapitulate patients and pa-tients’ caregivers experience about the effect of nusinersen treatment in SMA.

Background: Individuals with neuromuscular diseases (NMD) have low physical activity levels and an increased risk of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. Respiratory gas kinetics obtained during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) may provide valuable insights into disease mechanisms and cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with NMD. Recovery from exercise is an important marker of exercise performance and overall physical health, and impaired recovery is strongly associated with poor health outcomes. This study evaluates recovery metrics in individuals with NMD after performing maximal exertion during CPET. Methods: 34 individuals with NMD and 15 healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. CPET was performed using a wearable metabolic system and a wheelchair-accessible total body trainer to peak exertion. Recovery metrics assessed were (i) the time to reach 50% O2 recovery compared with peak exercise and (ii) the ratios of ventilation and respiratory gases between peak exercise and the highest values observed during recovery (overshoot). Results: The NMD group had a significantly longer time to reach 50% O2 recovery (T1/2 VO2: 105±43.4 vs. 76±36.4 seconds, p=0.02), lower respiratory overshoot (17.1±13.0% vs 28.8±9.03%), and lower ventilation/VO2 (31.9±28.3 vs. 52.2±23.5) compared to the control group. Conclusion: This study observes significantly impaired recovery metrics following peak exercise in individuals with NMD compared to controls. These insights may improve the understanding of exercise recovery and mechanics, thus improving prognostication and optimizing exercise prescriptions for individuals with NMD.