Aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells, originally observed by Warburg 100 years ago, which involves the production of lactate as the end product of glucose breakdown even in the presence of adequate oxygen, is the foundation for the current interest in the cancer-cell-specific reprograming of metabolic pathways. The renewed interest in cancer cell metabolism has now gone well beyond the original Warburg effect related to glycolysis to other metabolic pathways that include amino acid metabolism, one-carbon metabolism, the pentose phosphate pathway, nucleotide synthesis, antioxidant machinery, etc. Since glucose and amino acids constitute the primary nutrients that fuel the altered metabolic pathways in cancer cells, the transporters that mediate the transfer of these nutrients and their metabolites not only across the plasma membrane but also across the mitochondrial and lysosomal membranes have become an integral component of the expansion of the Warburg effect. In this review, we focus on the interplay between these transporters and metabolic pathways that facilitates metabolic reprogramming, which has become a hallmark of cancer cells. The beneficial outcome of this recent understanding of the unique metabolic signature surrounding the Warburg effect is the identification of novel drug targets for the development of a new generation of therapeutics to treat cancer.
Amino acid transporters are expressed in mammalian cells not only in the plasma membrane but also in intracellular membranes. The conventional function of these transporters is to transfer their amino acid substrates across the lipid bilayer; the direction of the transfer is dictated by the combined gradients for the amino acid substrates and the co-transported ions (Na+, H+, K+ or Cl−) across the membrane. In cases of electrogenic transporters, the membrane potential also contributes to the direction of the amino acid transfer. In addition to this expected traditional function, several unconventional functions are known for some of these amino acid transporters. This includes their role in intracellular signaling, regulation of acid–base balance, and entry of viruses into cells. Such functions expand the biological roles of these transporters beyond the logical amino acid homeostasis. In recent years, two additional unconventional biochemical/metabolic processes regulated by certain amino acid transporters have come to be recognized: macropinocytosis and obesity. This adds to the repertoire of biological processes that are controlled and regulated by amino acid transporters in health and disease. In the present review, we highlight the unusual involvement of selective amino acid transporters in macropinocytosis (SLC38A5/SLC38A3) and diet-induced obesity/metabolic syndrome (SLC6A19/SLC6A14/SLC6A6).
The amino acid transporters SLC38A5 and SLC7A11 are upregulated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). SLC38A5 transports glutamine, methionine, glycine and serine, and therefore activates mTOR signaling and induces epigenetic modifications. SLC7A11 transports cystine and increases the cellular levels of glutathione, which protects against oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation via glutathione peroxidase, a seleno (Se)-enzyme. The primary source of Se is dietary Se-methionine (Se-Met). Since SLC38A5 transports methionine, we examined its role in Se-Met uptake in TNBC cells. We found that SLC38A5 interacts with methionine and Se-Met with comparable affinity. We also examined the influence of Se-Met on Nrf2 in TNBC cells. Se-Met activated Nrf2 and induced the expression of Nrf2-target genes, including SLC7A11. Our previous work discovered niclosamide, an antiparasitic drug, as a potent inhibitor of SLC38A5. Here, we found SLC7A11 to be inhibited by niclosamide with an IC50 value in the range of 0.1–0.2 μM. In addition to the direct inhibition of SLC38A5 and SLC7A11, the pretreatment of TNBC cells with niclosamide reduced the expression of both transporters. Niclosamide decreased the glutathione levels, inhibited proliferation, suppressed GPX4 expression, increased lipid peroxidation, and induced ferroptosis in TNBC cells. It also significantly reduced the growth of the TNBC cell line MB231 in mouse xenografts.
Niclosamide, a drug used to treat tapeworm infection, possesses anticancer effects by interfering with multiple signaling pathways. Niclosamide also causes intracellular acidification. We have recently discovered that the amino acid transporter SLC38A5, an amino acid-dependent Na+/H+ exchanger, activates macropinocytosis in cancer cells via amino acid-induced intracellular alkalinization. Therefore, we asked whether niclosamide will block basal and SLC38A5-mediated macropinocytosis via intracellular acidification. We monitored macropinocytosis in pancreatic and breast cancer cells using TMR-dextran and the function of SLC38A5 by measuring Li+-stimulated serine uptake. The peptide transporter activity was measured by the uptake of glycylsarcosine. Treatment of the cancer cells with niclosamide caused intracellular acidification. The drug blocked basal and serine-induced macropinocytosis with differential potency, with an EC50 of ~5 μM for the former and ~0.4 μM for the latter. The increased potency for amino acid-mediated macropinocytosis is due to direct inhibition of SLC38A5 by niclosamide in addition to the ability of the drug to cause intracellular acidification. The drug also inhibited the activity of the H+-coupled peptide transporter. We conclude that niclosamide induces nutrient starvation in cancer cells by blocking macropinocytosis, SLC38A5 and the peptide transporter. These studies uncover novel, hitherto unknown, mechanisms for the anticancer efficacy of this antihelminthic.
Sigma receptors are non-opiate/non-phencyclidine receptors that bind progesterone and/or heme and also several unrelated xenobiotics/chemicals. They reside in the plasma membrane and in the membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondria, and nucleus. Until recently, the biology/pharmacology of these proteins focused primarily on their role in neuronal functions in the brain/retina. However, there have been recent developments in the field with the discovery of unexpected roles for these proteins in iron/heme homeostasis. Sigma receptor 1 (S1R) regulates the oxidative stress-related transcription factor NRF2 and protects against ferroptosis, an iron-induced cell death process. Sigma receptor 2 (S2R), which is structurally unrelated to S1R, complexes with progesterone receptor membrane components PGRMC1 and PGRMC2. S2R, PGRMC1, and PGRMC2, either independently or as protein–protein complexes, elicit a multitude of effects with a profound influence on iron/heme homeostasis. This includes the regulation of the secretion of the iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin, the modulation of the activity of mitochondrial ferrochelatase, which catalyzes iron incorporation into protoporphyrin IX to form heme, chaperoning heme to specific hemoproteins thereby influencing their biological activity and stability, and protection against ferroptosis. Consequently, S1R, S2R, PGRMC1, and PGRMC2 potentiate disease progression in hemochromatosis and cancer. These new discoveries usher this intriguing group of non-traditional progesterone receptors into an unchartered territory in biology and medicine.