The aim of this study is to compare surface roughness and microhardness changes of three monochromatic (Omnichroma, Vittra Unique, and Charisma Diamond One) and three universal shade (Neo Spectra ST, G-ænial A’CHORD, and Nova Compo C) resin composites after exposure to simulated gastric acid. A total of 144 disc-shaped specimens (24 discs of each composite resin) were prepared using plexiglass molds ( ) for evaluation from each material. Specimens of each material were divided into two main groups for the evaluation of the microhardness and surface roughness and also two subgroups for 7- and 14-day exposures to simulated gastric acid. Initial microhardness and surface roughness measurements of all samples were measured before immersion (T1) followed by exposing the samples to simulated gastric acid for 7 days (T2) and 14 days (T3), and then, the microhardness and roughness measurements were repeated. Randomly selected specimens of each material for each of the time intervals (T1, T2, and T3) were evaluated with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). One-way ANOVA revealed that the surface roughness and hardness values of all tested composite resin restorative materials show no statistically significant difference for the initial (T1) value ( ). Regarding the 7^th day (T2) and 14^th day (T3) surface roughness and microhardness value of all composites, there are statistically significant differences between the groups ( ), while there was no statistically significant difference between the surface hardness reduction percentage between the time intervals ( ). As a result of this in vitro study, increase in surface roughness and decrease in microhardness of the tested universal composite materials when exposed to simulated gastric acid were statistically significant.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the fracture strength of teeth restored using fiber-reinforced direct restorative materials after endodontic treatment with a conservative mesio-occlusal access cavity design. Materials and methods: A total of 100 extracted intact mandibular first molars were selected and distributed into a positive control group where teeth left intact and the following four test groups comprised of teeth with conservative mesio-occlusal access cavities that had undergone root canal treatment (n = 20/group): access cavity without restoration (negative control), bulk-fill resin composite with horizontal glass fiber post reinforcement, fiber-reinforced composite with bulk-fill resin and bulk-fill resin composite. Following thermocycling (10,000 cycles), fracture resistance was measured using a universal testing machine. Statistical analyses (one-way analysis of variance and the Tamhane test) were performed, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Groups with minimally invasive access cavities had lower fracture strength than intact teeth, regardless of the restoration material (p < 0.05). Fiber-reinforced composite groups demonstrated higher fracture strength than bulk-fill resin composite alone (p < 0.05). Fracture types varied among groups, with restorable fractures predominant in the fiber-reinforced composite groups. Conclusion: This study suggests that using fiber-reinforced composite materials, especially in combination with bulk-fill resin composites, can effectively enhance the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth with conservative access cavities. However, using only bulk-fill resin composite is not recommended based on the fracture strength results. Clinical significance: When teeth that undergo endodontic treatment are restored using a conservative access cavity design and fiber-reinforced composite materials, especially in combination with bulk-fill resin composites, the fracture strength of the teeth can be effectively increased.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different restorative techniques and materials on cuspal deflection and microleakage in MOD restorations. Eight groups were tested using incremental and bulk-fill techniques, with or without fiber reinforcement. The restorative materials included Filtek Z250 and Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior, while reinforcement materials such as Interlig glass fiber, EverX Posterior, and Surefill SDR were incorporated to assess their impact. In total, 96 freshly extracted, sound human maxillary first premolars were selected and stored in 0.1% thymol solution at 37 °C. The teeth were randomly assigned into eight groups (n = 12). Standardized MOD cavities were prepared, followed by endodontic treatment and sealing with glass ionomer cement. The groups were as follows: Group 1—Filtek Z250 applied incrementally in 2-mm layers; Group 2—U-shaped Interlig glass fiber followed by incremental Filtek Z250; Group 3—Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior using the bulk technique; Group 4—U-shaped Interlig glass fiber followed by Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior; Group 5—EverX Posterior followed by incremental Filtek Z250; Group 6—EverX Posterior followed by Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior; Group 7—Surefill SDR followed by incremental Filtek Z250; and Group 8—Surefill SDR followed by Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior. Cuspal deflection was measured using a digital micrometer with 0.05 μm precision. Microleakage was assessed using a 0.5% basic fuchsin dye solution at 37 °C for 24 h, followed by sectioning and examination under magnification. The lowest mean cuspal deflection was observed in Group 2 (15.8 μm), while the highest was in Group 5 (27.2 μm). Statistically significant differences were observed in cuspal deflection across the groups and over time (p < 0.05). Significant differences in microleakage scores were also found among the groups, indicating the impact of restorative materials and techniques on these outcomes (p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that Filtek Z250 and Filtek Bulk-fill Posterior showed different effects on cuspal deflection and microleakage. The use of glass fiber and EverX Posterior improved restoration performance by reducing polymerization effects. Surefill SDR also reduced cuspal deflection due to its low polymerization shrinkage. Clinically, selecting the appropriate restorative materials and techniques based on the extent of tooth structure loss can improve long-term outcomes.

Ic acid, and distilled water. Materials and Methods: Three single-shade universal composites were selected for this study. For each composite resin group, 92 samples (5-mm diameter and 2-mm depth) were prepared in plexiglass molds (N = 276). Then, samples were separated into four groups randomly consisting of 23 samples each (10 for hardness, 10 for roughness, and 3 for FE-SEM analysis). Three groups were immersed in food-simulating liquids (FSL)—citric acid (0.02N), distilled water, and 75% ethanol stored in a glass at 37°C for the next 7 days to simulate a wet oral environment. Control samples were stored in an opaque-light-proof box at room temperature. After the conditioning period, roughness and microhardness were measured, and FE-SEM analysis was performed. For statistical analysis, the two-way analysis of variance and Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used to evaluate roughness and microhardness (P < 0.05). Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the composites in terms of roughness and hardness averages (P = 0.001; P < 0.05). Omnichroma showed the most surface changes in ethanol storage, whereas Vittra Unique showed the most surface changes in citric acid storage such as Essentia. Conclusion: FSL that mimic various oral environments affect single-shade universal resin composite restorations....

The aim of this study is to evaluate the shear bond strength of different universal adhesives applied to intact, demineralized, and remineralized enamel surfaces with total-etch and self-etch modes and to examine the effect of universal adhesives on the Ca/P mineral atomic and mass ratios of these enamel with FE-SEM/EDX (Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy) analysis. For this study, 264 bovine incisors were used. Samples in the demineralized and remineralized groups were kept in demineralization solution at 37 °C for 96 h to make an artificial initial carious lesion. After demineralization, half of the demineralized samples were remineralized with MI Paste Plus. For shear bond strength (n = 144) and FE-SEM/EDX analysis (n = 120), G-Premio Bond and Clearfil S³ Bond Universal were applied on enamel surfaces with total-etch and self-etch modes, and bond strength samples were restored with resin composite. All samples were tested. The results were evaluated statistically by a three-way ANOVA test. The shear bond strength of the remineralized enamel showed high bond strength values comparable to intact enamel for universal adhesive systems. The Ca/P mineral atomic and mass ratios in remineralized enamel showed higher values than demineralized enamel, similar to intact enamel for universal adhesive systems. Initial carious lesion surfaces are unsuitable enamel surfaces for restoration. The remineralization of this surface layer before adhesive procedures may positively affect bond strength.