Timely and accurate information on tree species is of great importance for the sustainable management of natural resources, forest inventory, biodiversity detection, and carbon stock calculation. The advancement of remote sensing technology and artificial intelligence has facilitated the acquisition and analysis of remote sensing data, resulting in more precise and effective classification of tree species. A review of the remote sensing data and deep learning tree species classification methods is lacking in its analysis of unimodal and multimodal remote sensing data and classification methods in this field. To address this gap, we search for major trends in remote sensing data and tree species classification methods, provide a detailed overview of classic deep learning-based methods for tree species classification, and discuss some limitations of tree species classification.

Improving the precision of remote sensing estimation and implementing the fusion and analysis of multi-source data are crucial for accurately estimating the aboveground carbon storage in forests. Using the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform in conjunction with national forest resource inventory data and Landsat 8 multispectral remote sensing imagery, this research applies four machine learning algorithms available on the GEE platform: Random Forest (RF), Classification and Regression Trees (CART), Gradient Boosting Trees (GBT), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Using these algorithms, the entire Yunnan Province is classified into seven categories, including broadleaf forest, coniferous forest, mixed broadleaf-coniferous forest, water bodies, built-up areas, cultivated land, and other types. After a thorough comparison, the research reveals that the RF algorithm surpasses others in terms of accuracy and reliability, making it the most suitable choice for estimating aboveground carbon storage in forests using remote sensing data. Therefore, the study used the RF algorithm for both forest classification and the estimation of carbon storage. By extracting remote sensing factors; by using the Pearson correlation coefficient to select the most relevant factors; and by utilizing multiple linear regression, RF regression, and decision tree regression, a model for estimating aboveground carbon stocks in forests was developed. The results indicate that among the four classification algorithms, the RF classifier demonstrates superior performance, with an overall accuracy of 84.96% and a Kappa coefficient of 76.46%. In the RF regression models, the R² values for the coniferous forest, broadleaf forest, and mixed needle-broadleaf forest models are 0.636, 0.663, and 0.638, respectively. In both RF and CART, the R² values for the three forest-type models are greater than 0.6, indicating satisfactory model fitting performance. This study aims to explore the possibility of improving the estimation of forest carbon stocks in large-scale areas through fine land use classification. Additionally, the data sources used are completely free, and medium to low resolution can provide a better reference value for practical applications, thereby reducing the cost of utilization.

Optical remote sensing data have been widely used for estimating forest aboveground biomass (AGB). However, the use of optical images is often restricted by the saturation of spectral reflectance for forests that have multilayered and complex canopy structures and high AGB values and by the effect of spectral reflectance from underlayer shrub, grass, and bare soil for young stands. This usually leads to overestimations and underestimations for smaller and larger values, respectively, and makes it very challenging to improve the estimation accuracy of forest AGB. In this study, a novel methodology was proposed by incorporating stand age as a dummy variable into four models to improve the estimation accuracy of the Pinus densata forest AGB in Yunnan of Southwestern China. A total of eight models, including two parametric models (LM: linear regression model and LMC: LM with combined variables), two nonparametric models (RF: random forest and ANN: artificial neural network) without the age dummy variable, and four corresponding models with the age dummy variable (DLM, DLMC, DRF, and DANN), were compared to estimate AGB. Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) images and 147 sample plots were acquired and utilized. The results showed that (1) compared with the two parametric models, the two nonparametric algorithms resulted in significantly greater estimation accuracies of Pinus densata forest AGB, and the increases of accuracy varied from 8% to 32% for 100 modeling plots and from 12% to 35% for 47 test plots based on root mean square error (RMSE); (2) compared with the models without the age dummy variable, the models with the age dummy variable greatly reduced the overestimations for the plots with AGB values smaller than 70 Mg/ha and the underestimations for the plots with AGB values larger than 180 Mg/ha and, thus, significantly improved the overall estimation accuracy by 14% to 42% for the modeling plots and by 32% to 44% for the test plots based on RMSE; and (3) the texture measures derived from the Landsat 8 OLI images contributed more to improving the estimation accuracy than the original spectral bands and other transformations. This implied that two nonparametric models, coupled with the use of the age dummy variable and texture measures, offered a great potential for improving the estimation accuracy of Pinus densata forest AGB.

It is important to improve the accuracy of models estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) in large areas with complex geography and high forest heterogeneity. In this study, k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), quantile random forest (QRF), regularized random forest (RRF), and Bayesian regularization neural network (BRNN) machine learning algorithms were constructed to estimate the AGB of four forest types based on environmental factors and the variables selected by the Boruta algorithm in Yunnan Province and using integrated Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel 2A images. The results showed that (1) DEM was the most important variable for estimating the AGB of coniferous forests, evergreen broadleaved forests, deciduous broadleaved forests, and mixed forests; while the vegetation index was the most important variable for estimating deciduous broadleaved forests, the climatic factors had a higher variable importance for estimating coniferous and mixed forests, and texture features and vegetation index had a higher variable importance for estimating evergreen broadleaved forests. (2) In terms of specific model performance for the four forest types, RRF was the best model both in estimating the AGB of coniferous forests and mixed forests; the R² and RMSE for coniferous forests were 0.63 and 43.23 Mg ha⁻¹, respectively, and the R² and RMSE for mixed forests were 0.56 and 47.79 Mg ha⁻¹, respectively. BRNN performed the best in estimating the AGB of evergreen broadleaved forests; the R² was 0.53 and the RMSE was 68.16 Mg ha⁻¹. QRF was the best in estimating the AGB of deciduous broadleaved forests, with R² of 0.43 and RMSE of 45.09 Mg ha⁻¹. (3) RRF was the best model for the four forest types according to the mean values, with R² and RMSE of 0.503 and 52.335 Mg ha⁻¹, respectively. In conclusion, different variables and suitable models should be considered when estimating the AGB of different forest types. This study could provide a reference for the estimation of forest AGB based on remote sensing in complex terrain areas with a high degree of forest heterogeneity.