Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) existence is correlated with favorable prognosis in many types of cancer including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, TLS formation and its relationship with treatment response remains unknown in NSCLC who received anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy as the neoadjuvant treatment (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy). Here, we investigate TLS maturation and abundance in resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant treatments. We retrospectively collected formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues from patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II–IIIA) from three cohorts based on treatment: naïve (N=40), neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (N=40), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N=41). The TLS in tumor tissues was detected by immunohistochemical staining, and the differences in TLS maturation and abundance among different treatment groups were analyzed, as well as the relationship with pathological response and prognosis of patients. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was used to explore the features of immune microenvironment. Higher major pathological response (MPR) rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (MPR: 45.0% vs 17.1%; pCR: 35.0% vs 4.9%). Among the three cohorts, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLCs displayed highest TLS maturation and abundance. Both the maturation and abundance of TLS were significantly correlated with MPR in both the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and the chemotherapy group. Patients with high maturation and abundance of TLS exhibited better disease-free survival (DFS) in all the three cohorts. TLS maturation was also an independent predictor for DFS in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and treatment naïve group. Multiplex immunohistochemistry analysis using paired biopsy-surgery samples showed increased infiltration of CD8+T cell and decreased infiltration of M1 and M2 macrophages after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment in patients achieving MPR. There were no significant differences in features of immune cell infiltration for those with mature TLS achieving MPR when cross-compared across the three cohorts. These results demonstrate that TLS maturation is associated with MPR and an independent predictor for DFS in resectable neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLC. The induction of TLS maturation may be a potential mechanism of action of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) account for approximately 30% of non-small cell lung cancer. Investigation of the mechanism of invasion and metastasis of lung SCC will be of great help for the development of meaningful targeted therapeutics. This study is intended to understand whether the activation of Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is involved in lung SCC, and whether activated Hh signaling regulates metastasis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in lung SCC.

Perioperative immunotherapy, particularly anti-programmed cell death protein 1 therapy, combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy has emerged as one of the standard-of-care options for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the final analysis of RATIONALE-315, a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of perioperative tislelizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable, stage II-IIIA NSCLC. Adult patients in China were randomized (1 : 1) to receive either perioperative tislelizumab or placebo in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The dual primary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and major pathological response, assessed by blinded independent central review. The secondary endpoints included pathological complete response, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and safety. In total, 453 patients were randomized (226 to tislelizumab and 227 to placebo). At the final analysis (median study follow-up of 38.5 months), patients in the tislelizumab group experienced statistically significantly improved OS versus those in the placebo group {hazard ratio (HR) 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.93]; P = 0.009}. The median OS was not reached in either group. The 36-month OS rate was 79.3% in the tislelizumab group versus 69.3% in the placebo group. The median EFS was not reached in the tislelizumab group versus 30.6 months in the placebo group [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.43-0.79)]. Survival benefits were generally consistent across subgroups. The safety profile of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy was tolerable and consistent with known profiles of the individual therapies. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and adjuvant tislelizumab demonstrated a statistically significant, clinically meaningful OS benefit and sustained, clinically meaningful EFS improvement compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a tolerable safety profile in patients with resectable stage II-IIIA NSCLC. These results support the use of this regimen in this patient population. NCT04379635.

Gli promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human lung adenocarcinomas Gli promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human lung adenocarcinomas