Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) existence is correlated with favorable prognosis in many types of cancer including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, TLS formation and its relationship with treatment response remains unknown in NSCLC who received anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy as the neoadjuvant treatment (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy). Here, we investigate TLS maturation and abundance in resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant treatments. We retrospectively collected formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues from patients with resectable NSCLC (stage II–IIIA) from three cohorts based on treatment: naïve (N=40), neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (N=40), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (N=41). The TLS in tumor tissues was detected by immunohistochemical staining, and the differences in TLS maturation and abundance among different treatment groups were analyzed, as well as the relationship with pathological response and prognosis of patients. Multiplex immunofluorescence staining was used to explore the features of immune microenvironment. Higher major pathological response (MPR) rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group than in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (MPR: 45.0% vs 17.1%; pCR: 35.0% vs 4.9%). Among the three cohorts, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLCs displayed highest TLS maturation and abundance. Both the maturation and abundance of TLS were significantly correlated with MPR in both the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and the chemotherapy group. Patients with high maturation and abundance of TLS exhibited better disease-free survival (DFS) in all the three cohorts. TLS maturation was also an independent predictor for DFS in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and treatment naïve group. Multiplex immunohistochemistry analysis using paired biopsy-surgery samples showed increased infiltration of CD8+T cell and decreased infiltration of M1 and M2 macrophages after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment in patients achieving MPR. There were no significant differences in features of immune cell infiltration for those with mature TLS achieving MPR when cross-compared across the three cohorts. These results demonstrate that TLS maturation is associated with MPR and an independent predictor for DFS in resectable neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLC. The induction of TLS maturation may be a potential mechanism of action of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.
21 November 2024 in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Background: There is currently a lack of effective biomarkers to evaluate efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been investigated as a non-invasive tool for the assessment of tumor burden and minimal residual disease (MRD). The utility of ctDNA profiling in reflecting NAT efficacy, however, has not been confirmed. This study explored the association of ctDNA change with treatment response to NAT and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery. Methods: Eligible patients with stage IB–IIIA NSCLC were retrospectively included if they had received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (IO+Chemo), dual immunotherapy (IO+IO), or chemotherapy alone (Chemo). We conducted ctDNA profiling before and after NAT, after surgery, and during follow-ups using an ultra-deep lung cancer-specific MRD (LC-MRD) sequencing panel. Results: A total of 22 patients who received NAT followed by surgery between August 2018 and July 2019 were included in this study. The major pathological response (MPR) rates were 58.33% (7/12) in the IO+Chemo group, 25.00% (1/4) in the IO+IO group, and 16.67% (1/6) in the Chemo group. The ctDNA dynamics during NAT were highly concordant with pathologic response, demonstrating 100% sensitivity and 83.33% specificity, for an overall accuracy of 91.67%. Pre-surgery detectable ctDNA (after NAT) trended to correlate with inferior RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 7.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–60.22, log-rank P=0.03]. At 3-8 days after surgery, ctDNA was detectable in 31.8% of patients and was an independent risk factor for recurrence (HR, 5.37; 95% CI: 1.27–22.67; log-rank P=0.01). The presence of ctDNA at 3 months after surgery showed 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity for predicting relapse (C-index, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62–0.95). During disease monitoring after surgery, molecular recurrence by means of ctDNA preceded radiographic relapse, with a median time of 6.83 months. Conclusions: This study investigated the potential of ctDNA in evaluating NAT efficacy in NSCLC, implying the high concordance between ctDNA and pathological response. We also set out the prognostic value of perioperative ctDNA in predicting recurrence.
PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade with nivolumab plus ipilimumab improves overall survival (OS) in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, randomized data for resectable lung cancer are limited. We report results from the exploratory concurrently randomized nivolumab plus ipilimumab and chemotherapy arms of the international phase III CheckMate 816 trial. METHODS: Adults with stage IB-IIIA (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) resectable NSCLC received three cycles of nivolumab once every 2 weeks plus one cycle of ipilimumab or three cycles of chemotherapy (on day 1 or days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle) followed by surgery. Analyses included event-free survival (EFS), OS, pathologic response, surgical outcomes, biomarker analyses, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were concurrently randomly assigned to nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 113) or chemotherapy (n = 108). At a median follow-up of 49.2 months, the median EFS was 54.8 months (95% CI, 24.4 to not reached [NR]) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 20.9 months (95% CI, 14.2 to NR) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.15]); 3-year EFS rates were 56% versus 44%. Higher rates of EFS events were initially seen, with later benefit favoring nivolumab plus ipilimumab; 3-year OS rates were 73% versus 61% (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.14]); pathologic complete response rates were 20.4% versus 4.6%, respectively. In the respective arms, 83 (74%) and 82 patients (76%) underwent definitive surgery. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14% and 36% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed potential long-term clinical benefit versus chemotherapy, despite early crossing of EFS curves in the preoperative phase and a lower rate of high-grade toxicity.