Cheng Chen

Dr. Cheng Chen

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2012 in Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cheng ChenCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
GMG.R. McDowell
G.R. McDowell
NTN.H. Thom
N.H. Thom

1 February 2014 in Soils and Foundations
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cheng ChenCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
GMG.R. McDowell
G.R. McDowell
NTN.H. Thom
N.H. Thom

1 September 2015 in Computers and Geotechnics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cheng ChenCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
BIBuddhima Indraratna
Buddhima Indraratna
GMGlenn McDowell
Glenn McDowell
CRCholachat Rujikiatkamjorn
Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn

1 February 2022 in Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRui Rui
Rui Rui
YYYu-Qiu Ye
Yu-Qiu Ye
JHJie Han
Jie Han
YZYu-Xin Zhai
Yu-Xin Zhai
YWYi Wan
Yi Wan
LZLei Zhang
Lei Zhang

8 April 2014 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Cheng ChenCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
GMGlenn R McDowell
Glenn R McDowell
Previous investigations have shown that an abrupt stiffness change in track support is often associated with accelerated rates of deterioration of track geometry, high maintenance demand and poor ride quality. However, at present, there is no detailed understanding of the mechanisms of the deterioration of track geometry at transition zones. This paper aims to use the discrete element method to investigate transition zones from a micromechanical perspective. A simple track transition model with dimensions 2.1 m × 0.3 m × 0.45 m was simulated by using PFC3D. In order to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation methods, two kinds of transition patterns, including a single step change and a multi step-by-step change for subgrade stiffness distribution were tested. The influence of train direction, speed and axle load on the transition was also investigated. In addition, geogrid was used in the ballast layer to examine the effects of geogrid reinforcement. This paper provides insight into the factors that can cause or accelerate track degradation at the transition zones, in order to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation design.

27 June 2013 in Geomechanics and Geoengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Cheng ChenCheng Chen
Cheng Chen
GMG. R. McDowell
G. R. McDowell
NTN. H. Thom
N. H. Thom
This paper presents an evaluation of the behaviour of geogrid-reinforced railway ballast. Experimental large box pull-out tests were conducted to examine the key parameters influencing the interaction between ballast and the geogrid. The experimental results demonstrated that the triaxial geogrid outperforms the biaxial geogrid and the geogrid aperture size is more influential than rib profile and junction profile. The discrete element method (DEM) has then been used to model the interaction between ballast and geogrid by simulating large box pull-out tests and comparing with experimental results. The DEM simulation results have been shown to provide good predictions of the pull-out resistance and reveal the distribution of contact forces in the geogrid-reinforced ballast system. Therefore, the calibrated geogrid model and the use of clumps to model ballast particles hold much promise for investigating the interaction between geogrids and ballast and therefore optimising performance.