Pilar Rivera Ortega

Dr. Pilar Rivera Ortega


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
8 September 2023 in Cells
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JJJanet Johnston
Janet Johnston
DDDelia Dorrian
Delia Dorrian
DLDermot Linden
Dermot Linden
SSStefan Cristian Stanel
Stefan Cristian Stanel
Pilar Rivera OrtegaPilar Rivera Ortega
Pilar Rivera Ortega
NCNazia Chaudhuri
Nazia Chaudhuri
As the world transitions from the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, a novel concern has arisen—interstitial lung disease (ILD) as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This review discusses what we have learned about its epidemiology, radiological, and pulmonary function findings, risk factors, and possible management strategies. Notably, the prevailing radiological pattern observed is organising pneumonia, with ground-glass opacities and reticulation frequently reported. Longitudinal studies reveal a complex trajectory, with some demonstrating improvement in lung function and radiographic abnormalities over time, whereas others show more static fibrotic changes. Age, disease severity, and male sex are emerging as risk factors for residual lung abnormalities. The intricate relationship between post-COVID ILD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) genetics underscores the need for further research and elucidation of shared pathways. As this new disease entity unfolds, continued research is vital to guide clinical decision making and improve outcomes for patients with post-COVID ILD.

1 June 2021 in Panminerva Medica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSStefan C. Stanel
Stefan C. Stanel
Pilar Rivera OrtegaPilar Rivera Ortega
Pilar Rivera Ortega
Article: Smoking cessation: strategies and effects in primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention - Panminerva Med 2021 June;63(2):110-21 - Minerva Medica - Journals

17 July 2020 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TDThomas M Drake
Thomas M Drake
ADAnnemarie B Docherty
Annemarie B Docherty
EHEwen M Harrison
Ewen M Harrison
JQJennifer Kathleen Quint
Jennifer Kathleen Quint
Huzaifa AdamaliHuzaifa Adamali
Huzaifa Adamali
RJR Gisli Jenkins
R Gisli Jenkins
Rationale: The impact of COVID-19 on patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) has not been established. Objectives: To assess outcomes following COVID-19 in patients with ILD versus those without in a contemporaneous age, sex and comorbidity matched population. Methods: An international multicentre audit of patients with a prior diagnosis of ILD admitted to hospital with COVID-19 between 1 March and 1 May 2020 was undertaken and compared with patients, without ILD obtained from the ISARIC 4C cohort, admitted with COVID-19 over the same period. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary analysis distinguished IPF from non-IPF ILD and used lung function to determine the greatest risks of death. Measurements and Main Results: Data from 349 patients with ILD across Europe were included, of whom 161 were admitted to hospital with laboratory or clinical evidence of COVID-19 and eligible for propensity-score matching. Overall mortality was 49% (79/161) in patients with ILD with COVID-19. After matching ILD patients with COVID-19 had higher mortality (HR 1.60, Confidence Intervals 1.17-2.18 p=0.003) compared with age, sex and comorbidity matched controls without ILD. Patients with a Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of <80% had an increased risk of death versus patients with FVC ≥80% (HR 1.72, 1.05-2.83). Furthermore, obese patients with ILD had an elevated risk of death (HR 1.98, 1.13−3.46). Conclusions: Patients with ILD are at increased risk of death from COVID-19, particularly those with poor lung function and obesity. Stringent precautions should be taken to avoid COVID-19 in patients with ILD.

24 January 2026 in EBioMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISIain Stewart
Iain Stewart
JJJoseph Jacob
Joseph Jacob
JPJoanna C Porter
Joanna C Porter
BLBin Liu
Bin Liu
ATAmanda L Tatler
Amanda L Tatler
PCPHOSP-COVID Collaborative Group and the UKILD Consortium
PHOSP-COVID Collaborative Group and the UKILD Consortium
Long term respiratory symptoms are reported following recovery of acute COVID-19 infection and residual lung abnormalities (RLA) on follow-up thoracic computed tomography (CT) after COVID-19 hospitalisation have been observed. It is unknown whether RLA are associated with epithelial lung injury. Plasma was sampled from the observational Post HOSPitalisation-COVID cohort at five months post-hospitalisation. Epithelial injury biomarkers Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7), surfactant protein-D (SP-D) and surfactant protein-A (SP-A) were assayed. In those without follow-up CT, RLA at-risk was defined by percent predicted DLCO <80% and/or abnormal chest X-ray, otherwise they were considered low-risk. Follow-up CT RLA was defined as combined involvement of ground glass opacity and reticulation ≥10%. A total of 957 people were included, 846 people with no CT (at-risk n = 103; 12.2%), 111 people with follow-up CT (RLA ≥10% n = 85; 76.6%). All epithelial injury biomarkers were significantly elevated in people at-risk of RLA compared with low-risk. KL-6 and MMP-7 were significantly higher in people with ≥10% RLA than those with <10%, SP-D and SP-A did not reach significance. SP-D and SP-A were associated with percent involvement of reticulation (3.22%, 95% CI 1.19-5.24; 3.03%, 95% CI 0.76-5.30, respectively). RLA after acute COVID-19 infection were consistent with elevated epithelial injury biomarkers and pro-fibrotic signalling. Future studies should address the temporal association between fibrotic biomarkers and resolution or progression of radiological involvement. MRC-UK Research and Innovation and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) rapid response panel to tackle COVID-19 (MR/V027859/1; COV0319; MR/W006111/1).

1 September 2023 in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JJJanet Johnston
Janet Johnston
Pilar Rivera OrtegaPilar Rivera Ortega
Pilar Rivera Ortega

14 December 2022 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
CJC. Jackson
C. Jackson
ISI. Stewart
I. Stewart
TPT. Plekhanova
T. Plekhanova
PCP. Cunningham
P. Cunningham
AHAndrew Hazel
Andrew Hazel
PGPHOSP-COVID Study Collaborative Group
PHOSP-COVID Study Collaborative Group
Background: Sleep disturbance is common following hospitalisation both for COVID-19 and other causes. The clinical associations are poorly understood, despite it altering pathophysiology in other scenarios. We, therefore, investigated whether sleep disturbance is associated with dyspnoea along with relevant mediation pathways. Methods: Sleep parameters were assessed in a prospective cohort of patients (n=2,468) hospitalised for COVID-19 in the United Kingdom in 39 centres using both subjective and device-based measures. Results were compared to a matched UK biobank cohort and associations were evaluated using multivariable linear regression. Findings: 64% (456/714) of participants reported poor sleep quality; 56% felt their sleep quality had deteriorated for at least 1-year following hospitalisation. Compared to the matched cohort, both sleep regularity (44.5 vs 59.2, p<0.001) and sleep efficiency (85.4% vs 88.5%, p<0.001) were lower whilst sleep period duration was longer (8.25h vs 7.32h, p<0.001). Overall sleep quality (effect estimate 4.2 (3.0–5.5)), deterioration in sleep quality following hospitalisation (effect estimate 3.2 (2.0–4.5)), and sleep regularity (effect estimate 5.9 (3.7–8.1)) were associated with both dyspnoea and impaired lung function (FEV 1 and FVC). Depending on the sleep metric, anxiety mediated 13–42% of the effect of sleep disturbance on dyspnoea and muscle weakness mediated 29-43% of this effect. Interpretation: Sleep disturbance is associated with dyspnoea, anxiety and muscle weakness following COVID-19 hospitalisation. It could have similar effects for other causes of hospitalisation where sleep disturbance is prevalent. Funding: UK Research and Innovation, National Institute for Health Research, and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.