The need for cholecystectomy during pediatric age has significantly increased in the last two decades. As biliary pathology increases, the probability of complicated cholecystectomies increases too. The aim of this article is to analyze our experience with difficult laparoscopic pediatric cholecystectomy, focusing on the importance of an accurate pre-operative imaging study. We retrospectively analyzed all patients affected by cholelithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Pediatric Surgery Department of San Camillo Forlanini hospital of Rome and Santa Maria alle Scotte University Hospital of Siena from 2017 to 2022. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), recovery data, laboratory tests, imaging exams, surgical findings, post operative management and outcome were taken into account. Overall, 34 pediatric patients, with a mean age of 14.1 years (6–18 years) were included, with a mean BMI of 29. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography and a liver MRI with cholangiography (cMRI). We identified five cases as “difficult cholecystectomies”. Two subtotal cholecystectomies were performed. Cholecystectomy in pediatric surgery can be difficult. The surgeon must be able to find alternative strategies to total cholecystectomy to avoid the risk of possible bile duct injury (BDI). Pre-operative imaging study trough ultrasound and especially cMRI is crucial to recognize possible difficulties and to plan the surgery.

Introduction: Robotic surgery has shown explicit benefits and advantages in adults, but it is not yet strongly established in the pediatric population, even though its popularity is increasing, especially in the urologic field. Materials and methods: In this article we present our experience with the Da Vinci System (SI first and XI nowadays) at our pediatric institution in order to analyze our progress over the years. We considered all patients from the start of the robotic surgery program in 2016 until the end of 2021, dividing them into general abdominal surgery and genitourinary surgery. Analyzed data were the patient’s demographic, details of surgery, and intra and post-operative complications. Results: The total number of patients (pts) included in this study was 76, of whom 40 (52%) were male and 36 (48%) were female. The mean age at surgery was 90.9 months (range 10–207 months), and the mean weight at surgery was 29.3 kg (range 9.5–68 kg). There were 18 general abdominal robotic surgeries and 58 genitourinary robotic surgeries performed. The most performed surgeries in these two categories were fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (11%) and Anderson–Hynes pyeloureteroplasty. The mean operative time was 224.2 min (range 72–530 min): the mean times in the two groups (general abdominal surgery and genitourinary surgery) were 165 min (range 84–204 min) and 194 min (range 95–360 min), respectively. A total of four (5%) minor complications were reported. The total conversions were two (2.6%) and the mortality rate was 0%. Conclusions: Pediatric robotic surgery is a field of considerable interest and it is rapidly expanding. In our experience, it is evident how the learning curve has increased gradually, but steadily, allowing us to advance from standardized surgery, such as fundoplication and pieloplasty, towards a more technically complex one, achieving the same good results. We believe that robotic surgery is very respectful of tissues and feasible, especially for reconstructive surgery. For these reasons, it could become of common use also in the pediatric population, overcoming impediments such as excessive cost and the lack of pediatric instruments, in order to be able to treat children with a progressively lower age and weight.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LPSA) is the first choice for appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Trans-Umbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy (TULAA) is another used technique. We compared both these procedures used for the treatment of acute appendicitis. The study was conducted between January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: LPSA and TULAA groups. The collected data were: operative time, number of conversions, time of canalization and hospital stay. A total of 181 patients were included: 73 were kept in the LPSA and 108 in the TULAA group. Mean operative time was 70.9 minutes (range 45-130 min) for LPS and 56.4 (30-145 min) for TULAA group (p <0.0001). Complications rate showed no statistically significant difference between both the two groups. However, conversions showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.04). Both techniques showed similar results. TULAA technique takes a significantly shorter operating time. The selection between LPSA and TULAA techniques depends on the experience of the surgeon’s work and the personal laparoscopic learning curve. In our experience LPSA was a useful technique to improve the laparoscopic skill of the pediatric surgery residents.