Iulian Alexandru Dogaru

Dr. Iulian Alexandru Dogaru

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 May 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRamona Elena Dragomir
Ramona Elena Dragomir
OTOana Daniela Toader
Oana Daniela Toader
DMDaniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
LRLaura Răducu
Laura Răducu
RSRuxandra Viorica Stanculescu
Ruxandra Viorica Stanculescu
Background and Objectives: Maternal–fetal gestational pathology is one of the biggest challenges in the field of health at this moment. The current study is designed to determine the effects of vitamin D on pregnancy, starting with the idea that impairment of vitamin D status is thought to be correlated with impairment of the newborn’s health. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we tried to establish the link between vitamin D deficiency and maternal characteristics and also how it impacted the clinical status of the newborn. We analyzed a group of 260 patients: 130 pregnant women and 130 newborns, in whom vitamin D status was detected using the serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D). Results: The results showed that vitamin D deficiency has a high incidence among pregnant women, as was presented in many important international studies. Our study also showed a positive, direct correlation between the mother’s and newborn’s vitamin D status. Conclusions: Taking into consideration that vitamin D deficiency has been correlated with many complications, both in maternal and newborn health, a serum level determination of 25-(OH)D is necessary in the first trimester of pregnancy, and after that, adequate supplementation is necessary in order to prevent any negative effects.

1 June 2022 in Journal of Medicine and Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OGOfelia-Costina Goidescu
Ofelia-Costina Goidescu
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
TBTheodor-Georgian Badea
Theodor-Georgian Badea
MEMihaly Enyedi
Mihaly Enyedi
OEOctavian Enciu
Octavian Enciu
FFFlorin-Mihail Filipoiu
Florin-Mihail Filipoiu
Elements that comprise the inferior hypogastric plexus are difficult to expose, intricate, and highly variable and can easily be damaged during local surgical procedures. We aimed to highlight, through dissection, the origin, formation, and distribution of the hypogastric nervous structures and follow them in the female pelvis. We performed detailed dissections on 7 female formalin-fixed cadavers, focusing on structures surrounding the pelvic organs. For each hemipelvis, we removed the peritoneum from the pelvic floor, and after we identified the hypogastric nerves, we continued our dissection towards the inferior hypogastric plexuses, following the branches of the latter. Laterorectally, the hypogastric nerves form the inferior hypogastric plexus, a variable structure – nervous lamina, neuronal network (more frequently), or sometimes a combination of them. We identified three components of the inferior hypogastric plexus. The anterior bundle travels towards the base of the urinary bladder, the middle part innervates the uterus and the vagina, and the posterior segment provides the innervation of the rectum. The plexus can be identified after removing the pelvic peritoneum and the subperitoneal adipose tissue. Intraoperatively, the structures can be preserved by using an immediately-subperitoneal dissection plane. The variable branches are relatively well-organized around the pelvic vessels, supplying the urinary bladder, the genital organs, and the rectum. The ureter is surrounded by some branches, especially in its last segment, and it also receives innervation directly from the hypogastric nerve. Close to the viscera, the nerves enter neurovascular plexuses, making the intraoperative separation of the nerves and the vessels virtually impossible.

10 September 2024 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBTheodor G. Badea
Theodor G. Badea
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
ZFZoran F. Filipoiu
Zoran F. Filipoiu
DMDaniela E. Gheoca Mutu
Daniela E. Gheoca Mutu
FFFlorin Filipoiu
Florin Filipoiu
FSFlorin Filipoiu Sr.
Florin Filipoiu Sr.
Introduction Along the border between the abdominal cavity and pelvis are nervous structures that belong to the autonomous nervous system, which is delicate. These can be easily injured during regional surgical procedures such as the total mesorectal excision, where the preservation of the nervous structures should be one of the main objectives. In our study, we aimed to dissect all the sympathetic nerve formations listed at the abdominopelvic border and to present their formation, anatomical routes, and relations, as well as the surgical importance of their preservation. Method We performed anatomical dissections on eight 60- to 75-year-old cadavers (three male and five female) in the Dissection Laboratory of Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROM. We sectioned each pelvis along the right pararectal line and exposed the hypogastric plexuses and their branches, following their pathways toward the pelvic viscera. Results We highlight the main nervous structures in the pelvis, namely the paravertebral sympathetic ganglion chain, which continues into the pelvis with the sacral ganglion chain, and the prevertebral component of the abdominal sympathetic system, represented by the superior hypogastric plexus and its continuation via the hypogastric nerves toward the inferior hypogastric plexuses. We followed the pathway of the superior hypogastric plexus from its origin down to its bifurcation into the two hypogastric nerves. We then followed the nerves into the pelvis and observed the formation of the inferior hypogastric plexuses, from which branches emerged toward the pelvic organs. Along the way, we point out anatomical landmarks that are crucial in an attempt to spare these nervous structures during regional surgical procedures. Conclusions While performing surgeries such as rectal resection with the excision of the mesorectum, radical hysterectomy, and radical prostatectomy, a thorough knowledge of the sympathetic nerve structures that pass from the abdominal cavity into the pelvis is required to spare pelvic innervation. In such a context, the dissection and anatomical assessment of regional sympathetic nerves can prove to be crucial in establishing operative protocols.

10 February 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
DMDaniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
MEMihaly Enyedi
Mihaly Enyedi
ZFZoran-Florin Filipoiu
Zoran-Florin Filipoiu
Background: First described by Carl Toldt in the late 19th century, the mesorectum has since been a topic of anatomical and surgical debate. Its clinical importance was redefined by Heald’s introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), nowadays the golden standard in oncologic rectal surgery. This study aims to elucidate the embryological development and adult anatomy of the mesorectum and the mesorectal fascia, with a focus on clinically significant relations, particularly the peritoneum, and components of the hypogastric plexuses. Methods: We performed anatomical dissections on four 12–15-week-old human fetuses and eight formalin-fixed adult cadavers. In addition, a transverse pelvic section was examined to assess the spatial organization of mesorectal and fascial structures. Results: Our findings confirm the presence of a dorsal mesentery at the rectal level during fetal development, illustrating its transformation into the adult mesorectum. We identified the mesorectal contents in the fetus and examined the course and relations of the superior rectal vessels, hypogastric nerves, and pelvic splanchnic nerves, in both fetal and adult specimens. Conclusions: The observed fetal and adult configurations provide a continuous morphological description of the mesorectum and its compartmental organization within the pelvis. This study enhances the understanding of the mesorectum’s embryology, structure, and vital surgical landmarks. By delineating the so-called ‘Holy plane’ of Heald (the natural avascular plane between the mesorectal and presacral fasciae used during total mesorectal excision) and the delicate connective fibers known surgically as ‘angel’s hair’, which become visible when this plane is correctly entered, rectal and presacral fasciae, and neurovascular elements, provides a comprehensive anatomical framework that may inform surgical plane identification and support future clinical investigations into nerve-sparing rectal surgery.

22 December 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
RTRaluca Florentina Tulin
Raluca Florentina Tulin
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
IDIleana Dima
Ileana Dima
COCristina Orlov-Slavu
Cristina Orlov-Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Background/Objectives: Tumor biology—particularly HER2 expression, Ki-67 proliferation index, and triple-negative phenotype—has traditionally influenced the timing of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, real-world data from Eastern Europe remain limited, and variability in access and clinical practice persists. This study aimed to determine whether tumor biology independently predicts the likelihood of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a multidisciplinary tertiary center. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 208 consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR between January 2023 and January 2024. Associations between tumor biology (HER2 status, Ki-67 index, and triple-negative subtype) and IBR were examined using χ2 tests, independent samples t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status, comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological tumor size (pT), nodal stage (pN), and surgery type. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: IBR was performed in 41.4% of HER2-positive and 41.2% of HER2-negative patients (p = 1.00). Reconstruction rates across Ki-67 quartiles (≤10%, 11–20%, 21–40%, ≥41%) were 50.0%, 37.5%, 34.4%, and 37.5%, respectively (p = 0.58). Triple-negative status was not associated with IBR in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.08–2.18, p = 0.32). Significant predictors of IBR included younger age (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.93, p < 0.001) and less extensive surgery (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.59, p = 0.002). The mean interval to adjuvant therapy was comparable between IBR (28.7 ± 6.2 days) and non-IBR (27.9 ± 5.8 days) groups (p = 0.34), indicating that reconstruction did not delay systemic treatment. Conclusions: In this real-world Romanian cohort, tumor biology did not significantly influence immediate reconstruction decisions. Age and surgical extent were the main determinants of IBR, suggesting that reconstructive access was guided more by clinical than molecular factors. These findings support the shift toward multidisciplinary, biology-informed, and patient-centered surgical decision-making, in line with current ESMO and NCCN recommendations. Despite limitations—including the retrospective design, single-center setting, incomplete BRCA data, and absence of long-term oncologic outcomes—the study provides novel regional perioperative evidence supporting safe and equitable access to immediate reconstruction across biologic subtypes.

21 October 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
RTRaluca Florentina Tulin
Raluca Florentina Tulin
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
IDIleana Dima
Ileana Dima
COCristina Orlov-Slavu
Cristina Orlov-Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Background: Laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly adopted for colorectal cancer because of their advantages in perioperative outcomes. However, their implementation in medium-volume centers (<50 laparoscopic resections per year) remains limited. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 274 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Of these, 71 (25.91%) underwent laparoscopic surgical procedures (LS) and 203 (74.09%) open surgical procedures (OS). Primary and secondary endpoints included lymph node yield, resection margin distance, tumor stage, and hospital stay. Results: The mean lymph node yield was significantly higher in the open surgical procedure group (19.74 ± 10.63) compared to the laparoscopic group (16.09 ± 5.71, p < 0.05). Patients with significant cardiopulmonary disease or prior abdominal surgery were more often directed to open surgery, introducing selection bias that may explain differences in lymph node yield and hospital stay independent of surgical technique. The resection margin distance was significantly greater in laparoscopic cases (5.68 ± 3.12 mm) than in open procedures (4.76 ± 4.47 mm, p < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (7.14 ± 2.32 days) compared to the open group (13.17 ± 6.76 days, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in tumor staging was also observed between surgical approaches (p < 0.01), with earlier-stage tumors more likely treated laparoscopically. Conclusions: In a medium-volume center, laparoscopic surgical procedures provided comparable oncologic outcomes and superior perioperative benefits relative to open surgery, despite being more frequently performed for early-stage tumors. These findings support the safe adoption of laparoscopic colectomy outside high-volume academic settings, provided appropriate case selection and technical standards are maintained.