Dr. Iulian Slavu

Dr. Dr. Iulian Slavu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 April 2024 in Neurology International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mihai Alin PublikMihai Alin Publik
Mihai Alin Publik
FFFlorin Mihail Filipoiu
Florin Mihail Filipoiu
ADAdrian Vasile Dumitru
Adrian Vasile Dumitru
APAndrei Precup
Andrei Precup
IPIoan-Andrei Petrescu
Ioan-Andrei Petrescu
OMOctavian Munteanu
Octavian Munteanu
The development of the optic nerve and its surrounding tissues during the early fetal period is a convoluted period because it spans both the organogenesis period and the fetal period. This study details the microscopic anatomy and histoembryology of the optic nerve in embryos during the early fetal period, including the second half of the first trimester of pregnancy. Serial sections through the orbit of variously aged embryos allowed us to analyze the nerve in both longitudinal and transverse aspects. A histological assessment and description of the structures surrounding and inside the nerve were performed, highlighting the cellular subtypes involved. By employing immunohistochemical techniques, we could characterize the presence and distribution of astrocytes within the optic nerve. Our findings suggest that by the 8th gestational week (WG) the structures are homologs to all the adult ones but with an early appearance so that maturation processes take place afterward. By this age, the axons forming the nerve are definitive adult axons. The glial cells do not yet exhibit adult phenotype, but their aspect becomes adult toward the 13th week. During its development the optic nerve increases in size then, at 14 weeks, it shrinks considerably, possibly through its neural maturation process. The morphological primordium of the blood–nerve barrier can be first noted at 10 WG and at 13 WG the morphological blood–nerve barrier is definitive. The meningeal primordium can be first noted as a layer of agglomerated fibroblasts, later toward 13 WG splitting in pachymeninx and leptomeninges and leaving space for intrinsic blood vessels.

10 February 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
DMDaniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu
MEMihaly Enyedi
Mihaly Enyedi
ZFZoran-Florin Filipoiu
Zoran-Florin Filipoiu
Background: First described by Carl Toldt in the late 19th century, the mesorectum has since been a topic of anatomical and surgical debate. Its clinical importance was redefined by Heald’s introduction of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), nowadays the golden standard in oncologic rectal surgery. This study aims to elucidate the embryological development and adult anatomy of the mesorectum and the mesorectal fascia, with a focus on clinically significant relations, particularly the peritoneum, and components of the hypogastric plexuses. Methods: We performed anatomical dissections on four 12–15-week-old human fetuses and eight formalin-fixed adult cadavers. In addition, a transverse pelvic section was examined to assess the spatial organization of mesorectal and fascial structures. Results: Our findings confirm the presence of a dorsal mesentery at the rectal level during fetal development, illustrating its transformation into the adult mesorectum. We identified the mesorectal contents in the fetus and examined the course and relations of the superior rectal vessels, hypogastric nerves, and pelvic splanchnic nerves, in both fetal and adult specimens. Conclusions: The observed fetal and adult configurations provide a continuous morphological description of the mesorectum and its compartmental organization within the pelvis. This study enhances the understanding of the mesorectum’s embryology, structure, and vital surgical landmarks. By delineating the so-called ‘Holy plane’ of Heald (the natural avascular plane between the mesorectal and presacral fasciae used during total mesorectal excision) and the delicate connective fibers known surgically as ‘angel’s hair’, which become visible when this plane is correctly entered, rectal and presacral fasciae, and neurovascular elements, provides a comprehensive anatomical framework that may inform surgical plane identification and support future clinical investigations into nerve-sparing rectal surgery.

21 April 2024 in Cureus
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
OPOana-Andreea Popa
Oana-Andreea Popa
MAMihaela Amzulescu
Mihaela Amzulescu
CBClaudia Bugeac
Claudia Bugeac
LTLuminita Tomescu
Luminita Tomescu
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the central non-invasive imaging investigation for the evaluation of myocardial disease. It is the well-established gold standard for measuring cardiac chamber volumes, systolic function, and left ventricular mass, and it brings unique information for therapeutic decisions. In addition, its tissue characterization capability, through T1, T2, and T2* mapping, as well as early and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences, allows to differentiate in many cases among ischemic, inflammatory, and infiltrative heart disease and permits the quantification of myocardial fibrosis, providing valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. This review aims to highlight the main CMR features of different cardiomyopathies.

21 October 2025 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
RTRaluca Florentina Tulin
Raluca Florentina Tulin
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
IDIleana Dima
Ileana Dima
COCristina Orlov-Slavu
Cristina Orlov-Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Background: Laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly adopted for colorectal cancer because of their advantages in perioperative outcomes. However, their implementation in medium-volume centers (<50 laparoscopic resections per year) remains limited. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 274 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Of these, 71 (25.91%) underwent laparoscopic surgical procedures (LS) and 203 (74.09%) open surgical procedures (OS). Primary and secondary endpoints included lymph node yield, resection margin distance, tumor stage, and hospital stay. Results: The mean lymph node yield was significantly higher in the open surgical procedure group (19.74 ± 10.63) compared to the laparoscopic group (16.09 ± 5.71, p < 0.05). Patients with significant cardiopulmonary disease or prior abdominal surgery were more often directed to open surgery, introducing selection bias that may explain differences in lymph node yield and hospital stay independent of surgical technique. The resection margin distance was significantly greater in laparoscopic cases (5.68 ± 3.12 mm) than in open procedures (4.76 ± 4.47 mm, p < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (7.14 ± 2.32 days) compared to the open group (13.17 ± 6.76 days, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in tumor staging was also observed between surgical approaches (p < 0.01), with earlier-stage tumors more likely treated laparoscopically. Conclusions: In a medium-volume center, laparoscopic surgical procedures provided comparable oncologic outcomes and superior perioperative benefits relative to open surgery, despite being more frequently performed for early-stage tumors. These findings support the safe adoption of laparoscopic colectomy outside high-volume academic settings, provided appropriate case selection and technical standards are maintained.

22 December 2025 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
RTRaluca Florentina Tulin
Raluca Florentina Tulin
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
IDIleana Dima
Ileana Dima
COCristina Orlov-Slavu
Cristina Orlov-Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Background/Objectives: Tumor biology—particularly HER2 expression, Ki-67 proliferation index, and triple-negative phenotype—has traditionally influenced the timing of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. However, real-world data from Eastern Europe remain limited, and variability in access and clinical practice persists. This study aimed to determine whether tumor biology independently predicts the likelihood of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a multidisciplinary tertiary center. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 208 consecutive patients who underwent mastectomy with or without IBR between January 2023 and January 2024. Associations between tumor biology (HER2 status, Ki-67 index, and triple-negative subtype) and IBR were examined using χ2 tests, independent samples t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status, comorbidities, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological tumor size (pT), nodal stage (pN), and surgery type. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: IBR was performed in 41.4% of HER2-positive and 41.2% of HER2-negative patients (p = 1.00). Reconstruction rates across Ki-67 quartiles (≤10%, 11–20%, 21–40%, ≥41%) were 50.0%, 37.5%, 34.4%, and 37.5%, respectively (p = 0.58). Triple-negative status was not associated with IBR in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.08–2.18, p = 0.32). Significant predictors of IBR included younger age (OR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.93, p < 0.001) and less extensive surgery (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.59, p = 0.002). The mean interval to adjuvant therapy was comparable between IBR (28.7 ± 6.2 days) and non-IBR (27.9 ± 5.8 days) groups (p = 0.34), indicating that reconstruction did not delay systemic treatment. Conclusions: In this real-world Romanian cohort, tumor biology did not significantly influence immediate reconstruction decisions. Age and surgical extent were the main determinants of IBR, suggesting that reconstructive access was guided more by clinical than molecular factors. These findings support the shift toward multidisciplinary, biology-informed, and patient-centered surgical decision-making, in line with current ESMO and NCCN recommendations. Despite limitations—including the retrospective design, single-center setting, incomplete BRCA data, and absence of long-term oncologic outcomes—the study provides novel regional perioperative evidence supporting safe and equitable access to immediate reconstruction across biologic subtypes.

31 December 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDr. Iulian Slavu
Dr. Iulian Slavu
RTRaluca Tulin
Raluca Tulin
IDIulian Alexandru Dogaru
Iulian Alexandru Dogaru
IDIleana Dima
Ileana Dima
COCristina Orlov-Slavu
Cristina Orlov-Slavu
ATAdrian Tulin
Adrian Tulin
Background and Objectives: Hospital length of stay (LOS) after breast cancer surgery is a key indicator of postoperative recovery, healthcare quality, and hospital resource utilization. Traditional statistical approaches have identified general correlates of LOS but remain limited in predictive accuracy, particularly in heterogeneous real-world surgical populations. Machine learning (ML) models may offer improved performance by capturing nonlinear interactions among clinical, pathological, and operative factors. This study aimed to evaluate ML algorithms for LOS prediction and to identify determinants of prolonged hospitalization in a contemporary breast cancer cohort. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of 198 consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2022 and December 2023 at a single tertiary care center. Clinical, pathological, and surgical data were extracted from electronic medical records. Three regression models—multiple linear regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting—were trained to predict continuous LOS, and three classification models were applied to prolonged LOS (≥10 days). Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2), and area under the curve (AUC). Feature importance was analyzed for the best-performing model. Results: The median LOS was 7 days (IQR 5–10), ranging from 1 to 26 days. Breast-conserving surgery showed the shortest LOS (median 3 days), while mastectomy with immediate reconstruction resulted in the longest stays (median 8 days). Random Forest regression achieved the lowest prediction error (MAE 2.31 days; RMSE 2.82; R2 = 0.37), outperforming Gradient Boosting and substantially surpassing linear regression (MAE 8.63 days; R2 = –8.17). Key predictors included age, surgical complexity, reconstruction modality, BMI, implant capacity, and tumor burden. Classification models yielded modest AUCs (0.545–0.589) with low sensitivity, indicating limited discriminative performance for dichotomized LOS outcomes. Conclusions: Machine-learning models, particularly Random Forest, substantially improve LOS prediction compared with classical regression and provide clinically meaningful insights into the drivers of hospitalization after breast cancer surgery. Continuous LOS modeling is more informative than binary thresholds. These findings support integrating ML-based tools into perioperative planning, resource allocation, and patient counseling in breast surgical care.