Anne van Kempen

Dr. Anne van Kempen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2018 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlexandre Lapillonne
Alexandre Lapillonne
Nataša Fidler MisNataša Fidler Mis
Nataša Fidler Mis
OGOlivier Goulet
Olivier Goulet
CAChris H.P. van Den Akker
Chris H.P. van Den Akker
JWJennifer Wu
Jennifer Wu
WYWeihui Yan
Weihui Yan

1 December 2018 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VCVirgilio Carnielli
Virgilio Carnielli
DDDominique Darmaun
Dominique Darmaun
CBChristian Braegger
Christian Braegger
JBJiri Bronsky
Jiri Bronsky
WCWei Cai
Wei Cai
WYWeihui Yan
Weihui Yan

1 December 2018 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Braegger
Christian Braegger
JBJiri Bronsky
Jiri Bronsky
WCWei Cai
Wei Cai
Cristina CampoyCristina Campoy
Cristina Campoy
VCVirgilio Carnielli
Virgilio Carnielli
WYWeihui Yan
Weihui Yan

1 June 2006 in Pediatrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
NBNicole Boluyt
Nicole Boluyt
AKAnne van Kempen
Anne van Kempen
MOMartin Offringa
Martin Offringa
OBJECTIVE. Our goal was to assess the effect of episodes of neonatal hypoglycemia on subsequent neurodevelopment.METHODS. We searched Medline and Embase for cohort studies on subsequent neurodevelopment after episodes of hypoglycemia in the first week of life. Reference lists of available studies were reviewed, and content experts were contacted for additional studies. Included studies were selected and appraised for methodologic quality by 2 reviewers. Methodologic quality was assessed according to well-accepted criteria for prognostic studies. Eventually, all studies were given an overall quality score: poor, moderate, or high quality. Studies in the latter 2 categories were considered for quantitative data analysis.RESULTS. Eighteen eligible studies were identified. The overall methodologic quality of the included studies was considered poor in 16 studies and high in 2 studies. Pooling of results of the 2 high-quality studies was deemed inappropriate because of major clinical and methodologic heterogeneity. None of the studies provided a valid estimate of the effect of neonatal hypoglycemia on neurodevelopment. Building on the strengths and weaknesses of existing studies, we developed a proposal for an “optimal” future study design.CONCLUSIONS. Recommendations for clinical practice cannot be based on valid scientific evidence in this field. To assess the effect of neonatal hypoglycemia on subsequent neurodevelopment, a well-designed prospective study should be undertaken. We submit a design for a study that may answer the still-open questions.

1 December 2018 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Braegger
Christian Braegger
JBJiri Bronsky
Jiri Bronsky
WCWei Cai
Wei Cai
Cristina CampoyCristina Campoy
Cristina Campoy
VCVirgilio Carnielli
Virgilio Carnielli
WYWeihui Yan
Weihui Yan

1 December 2018 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChristian Braegger
Christian Braegger
JBJiri Bronsky
Jiri Bronsky
WCWei Cai
Wei Cai
Cristina CampoyCristina Campoy
Cristina Campoy
VCVirgilio Carnielli
Virgilio Carnielli
WYWeihui Yan
Weihui Yan