Detailed knowledge of the in vivo loading and kinematics in the knee joint is essential to understand its normal functions and the aetiology of osteoarthritis. Computer models provide a viable non-invasive solution for estimating joint loading and kinematics during different physiological activities. However, the joint loading and kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints during a gait cycle were not typically investigated concurrently in previous computational simulations. In this study, a natural knee architecture was incorporated into a lower extremity musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model based on a force-dependent kinematics approach to investigate the contact mechanics and kinematics of a natural knee joint during a walking cycle. Specifically, the contact forces between the femoral/tibial articular cartilages and menisci and between the femoral and tibial/patellar articular cartilages were quantified. The contact forces and kinematics of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints and the muscle activations and ligament forces were predicted simultaneously with a reasonable level of accuracy. The developed musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model with a natural knee architecture can serve as a potential platform for assisting clinical decision-making and postoperative rehabilitation planning.

Conventional cannulated screws are commonly used for internal fixation in the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. However, the noticeably high rates of undesirable outcomes such as nonunion, malunion, avascular necrosis, and fixation failure still troubled the patients and surgeons. It is urgent to develop new cannulated screws to improve the above clinical problems. The purpose of this study was to design a novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw and to further evaluate its biomechanical performance for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. A novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw was designed, and the conventional titanium cannulated screw was also modeled. The finite element models for vertical femoral neck fractures with magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and conventional cannulated screws were respectively established. The hip joint contact force during walking gait calculated by a subject-specific musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model, was used as loads and boundary conditions for both finite element models. The stress and displacement distributions of the cannulated screws and the femur, the micromotion of the fracture surfaces of the femoral neck, and the overall stiffness were calculated and analyzed using finite element models. The biomechanical performance of the Magnesium–Titanium hybrid cannulated screws was evaluated. The maximum stresses of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws and the conventional cannulated screws were 451.5 ​MPa and 476.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum stresses of the femur with the above different cannulated screws were 140.3 ​MPa and 164.8 ​MPa, respectively. The maximum displacement of the femur with the hybrid cannulated screws was 6.260 ​mm, lower than the femur with the conventional cannulated screws, which was 7.125 ​mm. The tangential micromotions in the two orthogonal directions at the fracture surface of the femoral neck with the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screws were comparable to those with the conventional cannulated screws. The overall stiffness of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw system was 490.17 ​N/mm, higher than that of the conventional cannulated screw system, which was 433.92 ​N/mm. The magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw had superior mechanical strength and fixation stability for the treatment of the vertical femoral neck fractures, compared with those of the conventional cannulated screw, indicating that the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw has great potential as a new fixation strategy in future clinical applications. The translational potential of this article: This study highlights an innovative design of the magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. The novel magnesium-titanium hybrid cannulated screw not only to provide sufficient mechanical strength and fixation stability but also to contribute to the promotion of fracture healing, which could provide a better treatment for the vertical femoral neck fractures, beneficially reducing the incidence of nonunion and reoperation rates.

Bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has several potential advantages including improved anteroposterior knee stability compared to contemporary posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. However, few studies have explored whether there is significant differences of knee biomechanics following bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty compared to posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. In the present study, subject-specific lower extremity musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics models for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were developed based on the musculoskeletal modeling framework using force-dependent kinematics method and validated against in vivo telemetric data. The experiment data of two subjects who underwent total knee arthroplasty were obtained for the SimTK “Grand Challenge Competition” repository, and integrated into the musculoskeletal model. Five walking gait trials for each subject were used as partial inputs for the model to predict the knee biomechanics for bi-cruciate retaining, bi-cruciate retaining without anterior cruciate ligament, and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. The results revealed significantly greater range of anterior/posterior tibiofemoral translation, and significantly more posterior tibial location during the early phase of gait and more anterior tibial location during the late phase of gait were found in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty without anterior cruciate ligament when compared to the bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. No significant differences in tibiofemoral contact forces, rotations, translations, and ligament forces between bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty during normal walking gait, albeit slight differences in range of tibiofemoral internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior translation were observed. The present study revealed that anterior cruciate ligament retention has a positive effect on restoring normal knee kinematics in bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Preservation of anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty and knee implant designs interplay each other and both contribute to restoring normal knee kinematics in different types of total knee arthroplasty. Further evaluation of more demanding activities and subject data from patients with bi-cruciate retaining and posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty via musculoskeletal modeling may better highlight the role of the anterior cruciate ligament and its stabilizing influence.

The uses of mechanical and kinematic alignments in total knee arthroplasty are under debate in recent clinical investigations. In this study, the differences in short-term biomechanics and long-term wear volume between mechanical and kinematic alignments in total knee arthroplasty were investigated, based on a subject-specific musculoskeletal multi-body dynamics model during walking gait simulation. An increase of 8.2% in the peak tibiofemoral medial contact force, a posterior contact translation by maximum 4.7 mm and a decrease of 5.5% in the wear volume after a 10-million-cycle simulation were predicted in the kinematic alignment, compared with the mechanical alignment. Nevertheless, the tibiofemoral contact mechanics, the range of motions and the long-term wear were not markedly different between mechanical and kinematic alignments. Furthermore, the mechanical alignment with a posterior tibial slope similar to that under the kinematic alignment was found to produce similar anterior–posterior translation and the range of motion, and an approximate wear volume, compared with the kinematic alignment. The ligament forces under the kinematic alignment were influenced markedly by as much as 25%, 50% and 77% for the medial collateral ligament, lateral collateral ligament and posterior cruciate ligament forces, respectively. And, a maximum increase of 40% for patellofemoral contact force was predicted under the kinematic alignment. These findings suggest that the kinematic alignment is an alternative alignment principle but no marked advantages in biomechanics and wear to the mechanical alignment. The adverse effects of the kinematic alignment on patella loading and soft tissue forces should be noticed.