Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) are antidiabetic agents recently approved for weight loss. Obesity is an established risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Moreover, preclinical studies have shown that GLP1-RA may attenuate thromboxane-induced platelet activation. Therefore, we hypothesized that GLP1-RA use may reduce the risk of VTE. We performed a target trial emulation (TTE) using a population-based database of electronic health records to evaluate whether GLP1-RA use is associated with a reduction in VTE in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i). Patients who were newly initiated on GLP1-RA were propensity score matched to patients who were newly initiated on DPP4i. We evaluated the primary outcome, composite VTE, identified using ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes, within 12 months of the initiation of GLP1-RA or DPP4i. The study cohort comprised 540 258 patients with 270 129 individuals receiving either GLP1-RA or DPP4i. Over 12 months of follow-up, patients who received GLP1-RA had a lower incidence of VTE compared with patients who received DPP4i (6.1 vs 7.6 events per 1000 patient-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73-0.83). This was similar for pulmonary embolism (2.9 vs 3.8 events per 1000 patient-years; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82) and deep vein thrombosis (3.9 vs 4.7 events per 1000 patient-years; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88). In this propensity score-matched, TTE study, patients with T2DM who received a GLP1-RA had a lower risk of VTE at 1 year compared with patients who received DPP4i.

Thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT) is a newly defined disease entity characterized by aggressive clinical behavior, diagnostic complexity, and poor prognosis. Given its rarity and heterogeneous histological presentation, establishing a definitive diagnosis can be challenging and relies heavily on comprehensive molecular and immunohistochemical evaluation. Here, illustrating the challenges highlighted by a real-world case, we describe the diagnostic pathway leading to SMARCA4-UT identification and discuss the differential diagnosis of thoracic tumors, relevant molecular evaluations, the molecular basis of SMARCA4-UT, and treatment implications. Recognition of this recently described entity is crucial, as an accurate diagnosis—as demonstrated by our case—can guide effective therapy and facilitate enrollment in targeted clinical trials.

There have been many clinical questions regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) could deteriorate the effects of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of this clinical question, including studies enrolling HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKIs (Palbociclib or Ribociclib) and reporting at least one comparative survival outcome, either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), between concomitant PPI users and non-users. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 2584 patients included (PPI users: 830, PPI non-users: 1754), demonstrating that concomitant PPI use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.77; I² = 0%) and disease progression (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.43; I² = 59%) in breast cancer patients taking Palbociclib. In contrast, there were no significant survival impacts of PPIs on Ribociclib (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.34; I² = 36%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk associated with CDKI dose reduction due to drug toxicity (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29). Therefore, when HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients require the use of PPIs, it may be reasonable to consider using Ribociclib.