Heather A. Renna

Mrs. Heather A. Renna


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2020 in Respiratory Investigation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DGDaniel S. Glass
Daniel S. Glass
DGDavid Grossfeld
David Grossfeld
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
PAPriya Agarwala
Priya Agarwala
PSPeter Spiegler
Peter Spiegler
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss

13 March 2025 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
RLRaymond Lau
Raymond Lau
SKStanislaw Klek
Stanislaw Klek
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
JLJoshua De Leon
Joshua De Leon
Worldwide, nearly 40% of adults are overweight and 13% are obese. Health consequences of excess weight include cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and increased mortality. Treating obesity is challenging and calorie restriction often leads to rebound weight gain. Treatments such as bariatric surgery create hesitancy among patients due to their invasiveness. GLP-1 medications have revolutionized weight loss and can reduce body weight in obese patients by between 15% and 25% on average after about 1 year. Their mode of action is to mimic the endogenous GLP-1, an intestinal hormone that regulates glucose metabolism and satiety. However, GLP-1 drugs carry known risks and, since their use for weight loss is recent, may carry unforeseen risks as well. They carry a boxed warning for people with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. Gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) are fairly common while pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction are rarer. There may be a loss of lean body mass as well as premature facial aging. A significant disadvantage of using these medications is the high rate of weight regain when they are discontinued. Achieving success with pharmacologic treatment and then weaning to avoid future negative effects would be ideal.

2 November 2023 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
Maryann JohnsonMaryann Johnson
Maryann Johnson
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
KSKatie Sheehan
Katie Sheehan
SASaba Ahmed
Saba Ahmed
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
Mitochondrial degeneration in various neurodegenerative diseases, specifically in Alzheimer’s disease, involves excessive mitochondrial fission and reduced fusion, leading to cell damage. P110 is a seven-amino acid peptide that restores mitochondrial dynamics by acting as an inhibitor of mitochondrial fission. However, the role of P110 as a neuroprotective agent in AD remains unclear. Therefore, we performed cell culture studies to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of P110 on amyloid-β accumulation and mitochondrial functioning. Human SH-SY5Y neuronal cells were incubated with 1 µM and 10 µM of P110, and Real-Time PCR and Western blot analysis were done to quantify the expression of genes pertaining to AD and neuronal health. Exposure of SH-SY5Y cells to P110 significantly increased APP mRNA levels at 1 µM, while BACE1 mRNA levels were increased at both 1 µM and 10 µM. However, protein levels of both APP and BACE1 were significantly reduced at 10 µM of P110. Further, P110 treatment significantly increased ADAM10 and Klotho protein levels at 10 µM. In addition, P110 exposure significantly increased active mitochondria and reduced ROS in live SH-SY5Y cells at both 1 µM and 10 µM concentrations. Taken together, our results indicate that P110 might be useful in attenuating amyloid-β generation and improving neuronal health by maintaining mitochondrial function in neurons.

21 August 2019 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
HAHirra A. Arain
Hirra A. Arain
LKLora Janis Kasselman
Lora Janis Kasselman
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
JZJuan Zhen
Juan Zhen
MPMichelle Petri
Michelle Petri
Background and Objectives: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in persons with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, lupus). Atherosclerosis, which involves interplay between cholesterol metabolism and cellular inflammatory pathways, is primarily treated with statins since statins have lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory properties. The Lupus Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (LAPS) was designed to investigate the efficacy of statins against CVD in SLE patients. LAPS demonstrated that 2 years of atorvastatin administration did not reduce atherosclerosis progression in lupus patients. In this LAPs substudy, we use cultured macrophages to explore the atherogenic properties of plasma from LAPS subjects to explain the mechanistic rationale for the inability of statins to reduce CVD in lupus. Materials and Methods: THP-1 differentiated macrophages were treated for 18 h with 10% SLE patient plasma obtained pre- and post-atorvastatin therapy or placebo. Gene expression of the following cholesterol transport genes was measured by qRT-PCR. For efflux—ATP binding cassette transporter (ABC)A1 and ABCG1, 27-hydroxylase, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ, and liver X receptor (LXR)α; and for influx—cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) and scavenger receptor (ScR)A1. Results: Macrophages exposed to plasma from both statin-treated and placebo-treated groups showed a significant decrease in cholesterol efflux proteins ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters A1 and ABCG1, an increase in 27-hydroxylase, an increase in the LDL receptor and a decrease in intracellular free cholesterol. No change in influx receptors ScRA1 and CD36, nor nuclear proteins LXRα and PPARγ was observed. Conclusions: Statins do not normalize pro-atherogenic changes induced by lupus and these changes continue to worsen over time. This study provides mechanistic insight into LAPS findings by demonstrating that statins are overall ineffective in altering the balance of cholesterol transport gene expression in human macrophages. Furthermore, our study suggests that statins as a CVD treatment may not be useful in attenuating lipid overload in the SLE environment.

28 September 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
Maryann JohnsonMaryann Johnson
Maryann Johnson
KSKatie Sheehan
Katie Sheehan
SASaba Ahmed
Saba Ahmed
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
Nilotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets the Abelson tyrosine kinase (c-Abl) signaling pathway, is FDA-approved to treat chronic myeloid leukemia. Nilotinib has properties indicative of a possible utility in neuroprotection that have prompted exploration of repurposing the drug for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). AD is a progressive age-related neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the deposition of extracellular amyloid-β plaques and intracellular neurofibrillary tangles. It is incurable and affects approximately 50 million patients worldwide. Nilotinib reduces c-Abl phosphorylation, amyloid-β levels, and dopaminergic neuron degeneration in preclinical AD models. This study explores the effects of nilotinib on amyloid processing and mitochondrial functioning in the SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line. SH-SY5Y cells were exposed to nilotinib (1, 5, and 10 µM). Real-time PCR and immunoblot analysis were performed to quantify the expression of genes pertaining to amyloid-β processing and neuronal health. Nilotinib did not significantly change APP, BACE1, or ADAM10 mRNA levels. However, BACE1 protein was significantly increased at 1 µM, and ADAM10 was increased at 10 µM nilotinib without affecting APP protein expression. Further, nilotinib treatment did not affect the expression of genes associated with neuronal health and mitochondrial functioning. Taken together, our findings do not support the efficacy of nilotinib treatment for neuroprotection.

7 February 2026 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
THTahmina Hossain
Tahmina Hossain
Thomas PalaiaThomas Palaia
Thomas Palaia
Aaron PinkhasovAaron Pinkhasov
Aaron Pinkhasov
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
Background/Objectives: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder. Current AD therapies offer minimal benefits and do not prevent or repair neuronal damage. More effective therapeutic approaches are needed to restore normal bioenergetics and metabolic function to AD neurons. Simufilam is a small-molecule oral drug that targets filamin A, a scaffolding protein in brain cells. Phase III clinical trials of simufilam failed to show any significant cognitive or functional improvements in AD patients. The purpose of this study is to identify and explain the molecular mechanisms that may have contributed to this drug’s lack of clinical success. Methods: Our study investigates the effects of simufilam on amyloid processing, neuronal health, and mitochondrial functioning in the SH-SY5Y human neuronal cell model. SH-SY5Y cells were differentiated into neurons using 10 µM retinoic acid. Undifferentiated and differentiated SH-SY5Y were exposed to simufilam (5 µM, 50 µM; 24 hr). Results: Simufilam did not affect the expression of genes involved in amyloid processing. Amyloid precursor protein (APP), β-secretase, and α-secretase mRNA levels in simufilam-treated SH-SY5Y cells were all unchanged compared to untreated cells. However, amyloidogenic β-secretase protein was significantly increased (fold change 1.17) at 50 µM of simufilam only in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells without affecting APP or α-secretase protein expression. Simufilam at the 50 µM concentration reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor protein levels (fold change 0.7) only in differentiated SH-SY5Y. Further, simufilam did not improve mitochondrial genes or structure. Conclusions: Our results align with clinical outcomes and indicate that insufficient activity across multiple tests of ability to impact processes related to neuronal health can serve as a preliminary indicator of limited clinical utility.