Shelly Gulkarov

Ms. Shelly Gulkarov

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 March 2025 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
RLRaymond Lau
Raymond Lau
SKStanislaw Klek
Stanislaw Klek
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
JLJoshua De Leon
Joshua De Leon
Worldwide, nearly 40% of adults are overweight and 13% are obese. Health consequences of excess weight include cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and increased mortality. Treating obesity is challenging and calorie restriction often leads to rebound weight gain. Treatments such as bariatric surgery create hesitancy among patients due to their invasiveness. GLP-1 medications have revolutionized weight loss and can reduce body weight in obese patients by between 15% and 25% on average after about 1 year. Their mode of action is to mimic the endogenous GLP-1, an intestinal hormone that regulates glucose metabolism and satiety. However, GLP-1 drugs carry known risks and, since their use for weight loss is recent, may carry unforeseen risks as well. They carry a boxed warning for people with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. Gastrointestinal adverse events (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) are fairly common while pancreatitis and intestinal obstruction are rarer. There may be a loss of lean body mass as well as premature facial aging. A significant disadvantage of using these medications is the high rate of weight regain when they are discontinued. Achieving success with pharmacologic treatment and then weaning to avoid future negative effects would be ideal.

30 January 2024 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
BJBenna Jacob
Benna Jacob
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
Aaron PinkhasovAaron Pinkhasov
Aaron Pinkhasov
JLJoshua De Leon
Joshua De Leon
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive and incurable neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects persons aged 65 years and above. It causes dementia with memory loss and deterioration in thinking and language skills. AD is characterized by specific pathology resulting from the accumulation in the brain of extracellular plaques of amyloid-β and intracellular tangles of phosphorylated tau. The importance of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD pathogenesis, while previously underrecognized, is now more and more appreciated. Mitochondria are an essential organelle involved in cellular bioenergetics and signaling pathways. Mitochondrial processes crucial for synaptic activity such as mitophagy, mitochondrial trafficking, mitochondrial fission, and mitochondrial fusion are dysregulated in the AD brain. Excess fission and fragmentation yield mitochondria with low energy production. Reduced glucose metabolism is also observed in the AD brain with a hypometabolic state, particularly in the temporo-parietal brain regions. This review addresses the multiple ways in which abnormal mitochondrial structure and function contribute to AD. Disruption of the electron transport chain and ATP production are particularly neurotoxic because brain cells have disproportionately high energy demands. In addition, oxidative stress, which is extremely damaging to nerve cells, rises dramatically with mitochondrial dyshomeostasis. Restoring mitochondrial health may be a viable approach to AD treatment.

28 October 2023 in Diagnostics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSteven H. Rauchman
Steven H. Rauchman
Aaron PinkhasovAaron Pinkhasov
Aaron Pinkhasov
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
DPDimitris G. Placantonakis
Dimitris G. Placantonakis
JLJoshua De Leon
Joshua De Leon
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
Mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) and concussion can have serious consequences that develop over time with unpredictable levels of recovery. Millions of concussions occur yearly, and a substantial number result in lingering symptoms, loss of productivity, and lower quality of life. The diagnosis may not be made for multiple reasons, including due to patient hesitancy to undergo neuroimaging and inability of imaging to detect minimal damage. Biomarkers could fill this gap, but the time needed to send blood to a laboratory for analysis made this impractical until point-of-care measurement became available. A handheld blood test is now on the market for diagnosis of concussion based on the specific blood biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1). This paper discusses rapid blood biomarker assessment for mild TBI and its implications in improving prediction of TBI course, avoiding repeated head trauma, and its potential role in assessing new therapeutic options. Although we focus on the Abbott i-STAT TBI plasma test because it is the first to be FDA-cleared, our discussion applies to any comparable test systems that may become available in the future. The difficulties in changing emergency department protocols to include new technology are addressed.

14 August 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anastasia BougeaAnastasia Bougea
Anastasia Bougea
MDManuel Debasa-Mouce
Manuel Debasa-Mouce
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
MMMonica Castro Mosquera
Monica Castro Mosquera
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
Alberto OuroAlberto Ouro
Alberto Ouro
Background and Objectives: Over the past few years, there has been a significant shift in focus from developing better diagnostic tools to detecting Alzheimer’s disease (AD) earlier and initiating treatment interventions. This review will explore four main objectives: (a) the role of biomarkers in enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of AD, highlighting the major strides that have been made in recent years; (b) the role of neuropsychological testing in identifying biomarkers of AD, including the relationship between cognitive performance and neuroimaging biomarkers; (c) the amyloid hypothesis and possible molecular mechanisms of AD; and (d) the innovative AD therapeutics and the challenges and limitations of AD research. Materials and Methods: We have searched PubMed and Scopus databases for peer-reviewed research articles published in English (preclinical and clinical studies as well as relevant reviews and meta-analyses) investigating the molecular mechanisms, biomarkers, and treatments of AD. Results: Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) discovered 37 loci associated with AD risk. Core 1 biomarkers (α-amyloid Aβ42, phosphorylated tau, and amyloid PET) detect early AD phases, identifying both symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, while core 2 biomarkers inform the short-term progression risk in individuals without symptoms. The recurrent failures of Aβ-targeted clinical studies undermine the amyloid cascade hypothesis and the objectives of AD medication development. The molecular mechanisms of AD include the accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau protein, vascular dysfunction, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and lipid metabolism dysregulation. Significant advancements in drug delivery technologies, such as focused Low-Ultrasound Stem, T cells, exosomes, nanoparticles, transferin, nicotinic and acetylcholine receptors, and glutathione transporters, are aimed at overcoming the BBB to enhance treatment efficacy for AD. Aducanumab and Lecanemab are IgG1 monoclonal antibodies that retard the progression of AD. BACE inhibitors have been explored as a therapeutic strategy for AD. Gene therapies targeting APOE using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing system are another therapeutic avenue. Conclusions: Classic neurodegenerative biomarkers have emerged as powerful tools for enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of AD. Despite the supporting evidence, the amyloid hypothesis has several unresolved issues. Novel monoclonal antibodies may halt the AD course. Advances in delivery systems across the BBB are promising for the efficacy of AD treatments.

16 January 2026 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SASiham D. Accacha
Siham D. Accacha
JBJulia Barillas-Cerritos
Julia Barillas-Cerritos
LGLiana Gabriel
Liana Gabriel
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
The prevalence and incidence of prediabetes in children and youth continue to increase in parallel with the obesity epidemic. While prediabetes is defined by elevated HbA1c and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and/or impaired fasting glucose (IFG), the risk of clinical disease is a continuum. Individuals with prediabetes are at a higher risk of developing youth-onset type 2 diabetes, which is considered a more aggressive form of the disease. This condition is associated with increased cardiovascular and metabolic risks and leads to an earlier onset of complications compared to adults with type 2 diabetes. Additionally, significant damage to beta cells may occur even before dysglycemia develops. Recent data indicate that mortality rates are higher in youths with type 2 diabetes compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Childhood prediabetes and cardiovascular complications associated with it are a significant health concern. This review provides the latest insights into this complex issue. We will present an overview of pathophysiology, screening methods, and therapeutic options to prevent the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes in children. In summary, it is crucial to identify prediabetes in children, as this underscores the importance of appropriate screening and timely intervention.

16 July 2026 in Life
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGShelly Gulkarov
Shelly Gulkarov
ARAllison B Reiss
Allison B Reiss
ASAnkita Srivastava
Ankita Srivastava
JLJasper Lim-Goyette
Jasper Lim-Goyette
HRHeather A. Renna
Heather A. Renna
AKAaron E. Katz
Aaron E. Katz
Background and Objectives: Cornerstone therapies for metastatic prostate cancer include androgen deprivation and androgen receptor pathway inhibition, but cognitive impairment is a recognized, life-altering potential adverse effect of this treatment. Abiraterone acetate (AA), an androgen receptor pathway and CYP17A1 inhibitor, suppresses androgen synthesis and may contribute to cognitive changes. This cell culture-based study uses the BE(2)M17 human male neuroblastoma model to investigate AA-induced alterations in gene and protein expression that may underlie cognitive decline, laying the foundation for a mechanistic investigation aimed at identifying molecular targets to mitigate cognitive impairment in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen-directed therapies. Materials and Methods: BE(2)M17 cells were pretreated for 12 h with dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 5 nM) or vehicle control, then exposed to AA (0, 5, 10 µM, 24 h). RNA and protein were analyzed by qRT-PCR and Western blot for markers of amyloid processing, neuronal health, and mitochondrial function. Results: AA significantly altered multiple neurobiological markers. BACE1 mRNA increased in DHT + 10 µM AA compared to control and DHT alone (p = 0.0416 and p = 0.0118). However, BACE1 protein decreased in 10 µM AA + DHT versus DHT alone (p = 0.0132). Immunoblot revealed reduced amyloid precursor protein (APP) in 10 µM AA versus control (p = 0.0057) and 10 µM versus 5 µM (p = 0.0263). APP was reduced in 10 µM AA + DHT versus control (p = 0.0015) and versus DHT alone (p = 0.0467). LRP1 and BDNF were significantly reduced with 10 µM AA versus 5 µM AA (p = 0.0092 and p = 0.0081), while synaptophysin decreased in 10 µM AA + DHT versus DHT alone (p = 0.0049). BDNF also declined in 10 µM AA + DHT compared to 5 µM AA + DHT (p = 0.0301). PGC1α mRNA increased in AA + DHT versus DHT alone (p = 0.0332). MitoTracker analysis showed reduced fluorescence with 5 µM AA alone but increased fluorescence with 5 µM AA + DHT relative to control and DHT (p = 0.0019; p < 0.0001), while 10 µM AA + DHT reduced fluorescence compared to 5 µM AA + DHT (p = 0.0003). Conclusions: AA, alone or combined with DHT, disrupts key pathways involved in neuronal health, amyloid processing, and mitochondrial function. These findings suggest a potential mechanistic link between AA treatment and cognitive impairment.