Gabriele Carciotto

Dr. Gabriele Carciotto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 September 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLucio Teresi
Lucio Teresi
Giancarlo TrimarchiGiancarlo Trimarchi
Giancarlo Trimarchi
PLPaolo Liotta
Paolo Liotta
DRDavide Restelli
Davide Restelli
RLRoberto Licordari
Roberto Licordari
GBGianluca Di Bella
Gianluca Di Bella
Electrophysiological aspects of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are still poorly explored compared to other aspects of the disease. However, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities play an important role in CA diagnosis and prognosis and the management of arrhythmias is a crucial part of CA treatment. Low voltages and a pseudonecrosis pattern with poor R-wave progression in precordial leads are especially common findings. These are useful for CA diagnosis and risk stratification, especially when combined with clinical or echocardiographic findings. Both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias are common in CA, especially in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and their prevalence is related to disease progression. Sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardias’ prognostic role is still debated, and, to date, there is a lack of specific indications for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). On the other hand, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia with a prevalence of up to 88% of ATTR patients. Anticoagulation should be considered irrespective of CHADsVA score. Furthermore, even if AF seems to not be an independent prognostic factor in CA, its treatment for symptom control is still crucial. Finally, conduction disturbances and bradyarrhythmias are also common, requiring pacemaker implantation in up to 40% of patients.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Rodolfo CaminitiRodolfo Caminiti
Rodolfo Caminiti
AIAlfonso Ielasi
Alfonso Ielasi
GVGiampaolo Vetta
Giampaolo Vetta
APAntonio Parlavecchio
Antonio Parlavecchio
DRDomenico Giovanni. Della Rocca
Domenico Giovanni. Della Rocca
Giampiero VizzariGiampiero Vizzari
Giampiero Vizzari
Background: The optimal timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well established. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI before versus after TAVR. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases up to 5 April 2024 for studies that compared PCI before and after TAVR reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023470417). The analyzed outcomes were mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) at follow-up. Results: A total of 3 studies involving 1531 patients (pre-TAVR PCI n = 1240; post-TAVR PCI n = 291) were included in this meta-analysis following our inclusion criteria. Mortality was higher in the pre-TAVR PCI group (OR: 2.48; 95% CI: 1.19–5.20; p = 0.02). No differences were found between PCI before and after TAVR for the risk of stroke (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 0.70–18.15; p = 0.12) and MI (OR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.30–1.42; p = 0.29). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed in patients with stable CAD undergoing TAVR that PCI after TAVR is associated with lower mortality compared with PCI before TAVR.

12 November 2025 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GIGiustina Iuvara
Giustina Iuvara
MFMarco Franzino
Marco Franzino
GCGabriele Carciotto
Gabriele Carciotto
TFTommaso De Ferrari
Tommaso De Ferrari
SGStefania Lo giudice
Stefania Lo giudice
Giampiero VizzariGiampiero Vizzari
Giampiero Vizzari
Intravascular imaging has revolutionized the assessment and management of coronary artery disease, providing unparalleled insights into plaque morphology, lesion severity, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization. This comprehensive review explores the current landscape of intravascular imaging, detailing the principles and clinical utility of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We discuss the role of these technologies in various clinical scenarios, ranging from stable coronary artery disease to acute coronary syndromes, emphasizing their ability to refine diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making. A key focus is placed on their application in identifying vulnerable plaques, a critical step in preventing adverse cardiovascular events. Furthermore, we highlight the role of intravascular imaging in guiding PCI, improving stent deployment, and reducing procedural complications. Finally, we explore emerging imaging modalities and technological advancements poised to further enhance coronary assessment, including hybrid imaging techniques. In addition to established modalities, this review examines emerging imaging technologies and the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and hybrid imaging systems, which hold promise for automated plaque characterization, improved reproducibility, and enhanced decision support during PCI. By summarizing the latest evidence and future directions, this review aims to provide a comprehensive reference for clinicians and researchers seeking to optimize the use of intravascular imaging in contemporary cardiovascular practice.

17 November 2023 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGabriele Carciotto
Gabriele Carciotto
FCFrancesco Costa
Francesco Costa
VGVictoria Garcia-Ruiz
Victoria Garcia-Ruiz
MGMattia Galli
Mattia Galli
ESEmmanuele Soraci
Emmanuele Soraci
Leonardo De LucaLeonardo De Luca
Leonardo De Luca
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrancesco Pallante
Francesco Pallante
FCFrancesco Costa
Francesco Costa
VRVictoria Garcia Ruiz
Victoria Garcia Ruiz
Giampiero VizzariGiampiero Vizzari
Giampiero Vizzari
PIPietro Iannello
Pietro Iannello
FPFrancesco Patanè
Francesco Patanè
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) now represents the mainstay of treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Owing to its exceptional procedural efficacy and safety, TAVI has been extended to include patients at lower surgical risk, thus now encompassing a diverse patient population receiving this treatment. Yet, long-term outcomes also depend on optimal medical therapy for secondary vascular prevention, with antithrombotic therapy serving as the cornerstone. Leveraging data from multiple randomized controlled trials, the current guidelines generally recommend single antithrombotic therapy, with either single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or oral anticoagulation (OAC) alone in those patients without or with atrial fibrillation, respectively. Yet, individualization of this pattern, as well as specific case uses, may be needed based on individual patient characteristics and concurrent procedures. This review aims to discuss the evidence supporting antithrombotic treatments in patients treated with TAVI, indications for a standardized treatment, as well as specific considerations for an individualized approach to treatment.

17 October 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GCGabriele Carciotto
Gabriele Carciotto
FCFrancesco Costa
Francesco Costa
VGVictoria Garcia-Ruiz
Victoria Garcia-Ruiz
MGMattia Galli
Mattia Galli
ESEmmanuele Soraci
Emmanuele Soraci
Leonardo De LucaLeonardo De Luca
Leonardo De Luca
Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), comprising aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, is the cornerstone of post-percutaneous coronary intervention treatment to prevent stent thrombosis and reduce the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The selection of an optimal DAPT regimen, considering the interplay of various antiplatelet agents, patient profiles, and procedural characteristics, remains an evolving challenge. Traditionally, a standard duration of 12 months has been recommended for DAPT in most patients. While contemporary guidelines provide general frameworks, DAPT modulation with longer or shorter treatment courses followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy are evolving towards an individualized strategy to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety. This review comprehensively examines the current landscape of DAPT strategies after coronary stenting, with a focus on emerging evidence for treatment individualization.