Transient left ventricular dysfunction (TLVD), a temporary condition marked by reversible impairment of ventricular function, remains an underdiagnosed yet significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in clinical practice. Unlike the well-explored atherosclerotic disease of the epicardial coronary arteries, the diverse etiologies of TLVD require greater attention for proper diagnosis and management. The spectrum of disorders associated with TLVD includes stress-induced cardiomyopathy, central nervous system injuries, histaminergic syndromes, various inflammatory diseases, pregnancy-related conditions, and genetically determined syndromes. Furthermore, myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) origins such as coronary artery spasm, coronary thromboembolism, and spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) may also manifest as TLVD, eventually showing recovery. This review highlights the range of ischemic and non-ischemic clinical situations that lead to TLVD, gathering conditions like Tako-Tsubo Syndrome (TTS), Kounis syndrome (KS), Myocarditis, Peripartum Cardiomyopathy (PPCM), and Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC). Differentiation amongst these causes is crucial, as they involve distinct clinical, instrumental, and genetic predictors that bode different outcomes and recovery potential for left ventricular function. The purpose of this review is to improve everyday clinical approaches to treating these diseases by providing an extensive survey of conditions linked with TLVD and the elements impacting prognosis and outcomes.

Electrophysiological aspects of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are still poorly explored compared to other aspects of the disease. However, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities play an important role in CA diagnosis and prognosis and the management of arrhythmias is a crucial part of CA treatment. Low voltages and a pseudonecrosis pattern with poor R-wave progression in precordial leads are especially common findings. These are useful for CA diagnosis and risk stratification, especially when combined with clinical or echocardiographic findings. Both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias are common in CA, especially in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and their prevalence is related to disease progression. Sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardias’ prognostic role is still debated, and, to date, there is a lack of specific indications for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). On the other hand, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia with a prevalence of up to 88% of ATTR patients. Anticoagulation should be considered irrespective of CHADsVA score. Furthermore, even if AF seems to not be an independent prognostic factor in CA, its treatment for symptom control is still crucial. Finally, conduction disturbances and bradyarrhythmias are also common, requiring pacemaker implantation in up to 40% of patients.

Among cardiomyopathies, the hypertrophic phenotype is the most common, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenocopies represent a heterogeneous group of conditions. They are defined by a left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm in the absence of other causes such as loading conditions, ischemia, or valvular disease. Although they mimic similar clinical and morphological features, their etiologies are distinct and include genetic, metabolic, and infiltrative mechanisms. Therefore, accurate classification and differential diagnosis are crucial for effective management and treatment. Sarcomeric HCM is the most frequent form, accounting for up to 60% of cases. However, numerous non-sarcomeric phenocopies exist, including amyloidosis, Fabry disease, glycogen storage disorders, RASopathies, and mitochondrial diseases. Clinical and imaging findings are essential to distinguish these entities from sarcomeric HCM. Electrocardiography, echocardiography, advanced modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and specific laboratory tests all play a central role in guiding diagnosis. Genetic testing provides key insights into mutations and inheritance patterns, further supporting definitive diagnosis. Correct identification of an HCM phenocopy carries important therapeutic implications, as disease-specific treatments can significantly improve prognosis. For example, targeted therapies exist for amyloidosis, Fabry disease, and certain metabolic or mitochondrial disorders, underlining the clinical relevance of an accurate diagnosis. This review aims to provide an overview of HCM phenocopies and assist clinicians in diagnostic reasoning. The first part addresses classification according to pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical features, and genetic background. The second part focuses on the stepwise approach to differential diagnosis, integrating clinical assessment, laboratory evaluation, ECG, echocardiography, and CMR findings.

Several studies have demonstrated that, beyond their antithrombotic effects, P2Y12 receptor inhibitors may provide additional off-target effects through different mechanisms. These effects range from the preservation of endothelial barrier function to the modulation of inflammation or stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, with an impact on different cell types, including endothelial and immune cells. Many P2Y12 inhibitors have been developed, from ticlopidine, the first thienopyridine, to the more potent non-thienopyridine derivatives such as ticagrelor which may promote cardioprotective effects following myocardial infarction (MI) by inhibiting adenosine reuptake through sodium-independent equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1). Adenosine may affect different molecular pathways involved in cardiac fibrosis, such as the Wnt (wingless-type)/beta (β)-catenin signaling. An early pro-fibrotic response of the epicardium and activation of cardiac fibroblasts with the involvement of Wnt1 (wingless-type family member 1)/β-catenin, are critically required for preserving cardiac function after acute ischemic cardiac injury. This review discusses molecular signaling pathways involved in cardiac fibrosis post MI, focusing on the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and the off-target effect of P2Y12 receptor inhibition. A potential role of ticagrelor was speculated in the early modulation of cardiac fibrosis, thanks to its off-target effect.

Among cardiomyopathies, the hypertrophic phenotype is the most common, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) phenocopies represent a heterogeneous group of conditions. They are defined by a left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm in the absence of other causes such as loading conditions, ischemia, or valvular disease. Although they mimic similar clinical and morphological features, their aetiologies are distinct and include genetic, metabolic, and infiltrative mechanisms. Therefore, accurate classification and differential diagnosis are crucial for effective management and treatment. Sarcomeric HCM is the most frequent form, accounting for up to 60% of cases. However, numerous non-sarcomeric phenocopies exist, including amyloidosis, Fabry disease, glycogen storage disorders, RASopathies, and mitochondrial diseases. Clinical and imaging findings are essential to distinguish these entities from sarcomeric HCM. Electrocardiography, echocardiography, advanced modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and specific laboratory tests all play a central role in guiding diagnosis. Genetic testing provides key insights into mutations and inheritance patterns, further supporting definitive diagnosis. Correct identification of an HCM phenocopy carries important therapeutic implications, as disease-specific treatments can significantly improve prognosis. For example, targeted therapies exist for amyloidosis, Fabry disease, and certain metabolic or mitochondrial disorders, underlining the clinical relevance of an accurate diagnosis. This review aims to provide an overview of HCM phenocopies and assist clinicians in diagnostic reasoning. The first part addresses classification according to pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical features, and genetic background. The second part focuses on the stepwise approach to differential diagnosis, integrating clinical assessment, laboratory evaluation, ECG, echocardiography, and CMR findings.