Phil Duncan Green

Prof. Phil Duncan Green

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2001 in Speech Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMartin Cooke
Martin Cooke
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green
LJLjubomir Josifovski
Ljubomir Josifovski
AVAscension Vizinho
Ascension Vizinho

1 May 2013 in Computer Speech & Language
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJon Barker
Jon Barker
EVEmmanuel Vincent
Emmanuel Vincent
NMNing Ma
Ning Ma
HCHeidi Christensen
Heidi Christensen
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green

3 August 2012 in IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MHMark Hawley
Mark Hawley
SCStuart P. Cunningham
Stuart P. Cunningham
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green
PEPam Enderby
Pam Enderby
RPRebecca Palmer
Rebecca Palmer
POPeter O'NEill
Peter O'NEill
A new form of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) device for people with severe speech impairment-the voice-input voice-output communication aid (VIVOCA)-is described. The VIVOCA recognizes the disordered speech of the user and builds messages, which are converted into synthetic speech. System development was carried out employing user-centered design and development methods, which identified and refined key requirements for the device. A novel methodology for building small vocabulary, speaker-dependent automatic speech recognizers with reduced amounts of training data, was applied. Experiments showed that this method is successful in generating good recognition performance (mean accuracy 96%) on highly disordered speech, even when recognition perplexity is increased. The selected message-building technique traded off various factors including speed of message construction and range of available message outputs. The VIVOCA was evaluated in a field trial by individuals with moderate to severe dysarthria and confirmed that they can make use of the device to produce intelligible speech output from disordered speech input. The trial highlighted some issues which limit the performance and usability of the device when applied in real usage situations, with mean recognition accuracy of 67% in these circumstances. These limitations will be addressed in future work.

17 October 2006 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMark Hawley
Mark Hawley
PEPam Enderby
Pam Enderby
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green
SCStuart Cunningham
Stuart Cunningham
SBSimon Brownsell
Simon Brownsell
RPRebecca Palmer
Rebecca Palmer
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) can provide a rapid means of controlling electronic assistive technology. Off-the-shelf ASR systems function poorly for users with severe dysarthria because of the increased variability of their articulations. We have developed a limited vocabulary speaker dependent speech recognition application which has greater tolerance to variability of speech, coupled with a computerised training package which assists dysarthric speakers to improve the consistency of their vocalisations and provides more data for recogniser training. These applications, and their implementation as the interface for a speech-controlled environmental control system (ECS), are described. The results of field trials to evaluate the training program and the speech-controlled ECS are presented. The user-training phase increased the recognition rate from 88.5% to 95.4% (p<0.001). Recognition rates were good for people with even the most severe dysarthria in everyday usage in the home (mean word recognition rate 86.9%). Speech-controlled ECS were less accurate (mean task completion accuracy 78.6% versus 94.8%) but were faster to use than switch-scanning systems, even taking into account the need to repeat unsuccessful operations (mean task completion time 7.7s versus 16.9s, p<0.001). It is concluded that a speech-controlled ECS is a viable alternative to switch-scanning systems for some people with severe dysarthria and would lead, in many cases, to more efficient control of the home.

1 January 2013 in Speech Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRobin Hofe
Robin Hofe
SEStephen R. Ell
Stephen R. Ell
MFMichael J. Fagan
Michael J. Fagan
James M. GilbertJames M. Gilbert
James M. Gilbert
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green
SRSergey I. Rybchenko
Sergey I. Rybchenko

21 September 2010 in Medical Engineering & Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
James M. GilbertJames M. Gilbert
James M. Gilbert
SRS.I. Rybchenko
S.I. Rybchenko
RHR. Hofe
R. Hofe
SES.R. Ell
S.R. Ell
MFM.J. Fagan
M.J. Fagan
PGPhil Duncan Green
Phil Duncan Green
There are a number of situations where individuals wish to communicate verbally but are unable to use conventional means-so called 'silent speech'. These include speakers in noisy and covert situations as well as patients who have lost their voice as a result of a laryngectomy or similar procedure. This paper focuses on those who are unable to speak following a laryngectomy and assesses the possibility of speech recognition based on a magnetic implant/sensors system. Permanent magnets are placed on the tongue and lips and the changes in magnetic field resulting from movement during speech are monitored using a set of magnetic sensors. The sensor signals are compared to sets of pre-recorded templates using the dynamic time warping (DTW) method, and the best match is identified. Experimental trials are reported for subjects with intact larynx, typically using 500-1000 utterances used for speaker dependant training and testing. It is shown that recognition rates of over 90% are achievable for vocabularies of at least 57 isolated words: sufficient to drive command-and-control applications.