Pawin Numthavaj

Dr. Pawin Numthavaj


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CCChuenkamon Charakorn
Chuenkamon Charakorn
KTKunlawat Thadanipon
Kunlawat Thadanipon
SCSawarat Chaijindaratana
Sawarat Chaijindaratana
SRSasivimol Rattanasiri
Sasivimol Rattanasiri
PNPawin Numthavaj
Pawin Numthavaj
ATAmmarin Thakkinstian
Ammarin Thakkinstian
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool association effects of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) on recurrence and mortality in mainly squamous cell cervical cancer patients. MEDLINE and Scopus databases were searched up to June 29, 2016. Studies assessing effects of SCC-Ag on recurrence and death in cervical cancer patients were included. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers. A meta-analysis was applied for pooling the effects (i.e., risk ratio (RR), hazard ratio (HR), and unstandardized mean difference (USMD)) of SCC-Ag measured before and after treatment on recurrence and death. A total of 61 studies were included. For pretreatment SCC-Ag and recurrence, the pooled RR, HR, and USMD for high versus low serum SCC-Ag were 2.44(95% CI: 1.91, 3.13), 2.23(95% CI: 2.03, 2.45), -7.7(95% CI: -31.7, 16.4), respectively. The corresponding effects for the posttreatment period were 3.91(95% CI: 2.96, 5.16), 3.14(95% CI: 1.29, 7.65), and 3.2(95% CI: -10.6, 17.0), respectively. In addition, patients with high level of pretreatment serum SCC-Ag were also at a higher risk for death than patients with low serum SCC-Ag with a pooled RR of 3.66(95% CI: 2.24, 5.98), pooled HR of 2.50(95% CI: 1.85, 3.37), and pooled USMD of 7.10(95% CI: 4.26, 9.94). The posttreatment serum SCC-Ag effects also reflected a similar trend. The serum SCC-Ag was consistently associated with recurrence and mortality of newly diagnosed cervical cancer. This marker may be useful in monitoring disease progression in cervical cancer patients. Prospero registration number is: CRD42016044024.

1 January 2015 in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NSNakarin Sansanayudh
Nakarin Sansanayudh
DMDittapol Muntham
Dittapol Muntham
SYSukit Yamwong
Sukit Yamwong
Mark McEvoyMark McEvoy
Mark McEvoy
JAJohn Attia
John Attia
PNPawin Numthavaj
Pawin Numthavaj
Summary: Large platelets with high haemostatic activity may lead to increased platelet aggregation.. Mean platelet volume (MPV), an indicator of platelet reactivity, may emerge as a prognostic marker in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It was the objective of this study to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess prognostic effects of MPV on cardiovascular events (CVE) in CAD patients. We searched MEDLINE and SCOPUS from inception to January 2, 2014. All studies that reported MPV and the incidence of cardiovascular events in CAD patients were included. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. A random-effects model was applied for pooling the mean difference of MPV between patients with vs without CVE. Among 30 eligible studies, eight studies reported mean difference of MPV between CVE groups, 11 studies reported MPV dichotomous into high vs low MPV groups, and 11 studies reported both. The pooled mean difference was 0.69 fL (95 %CI = 0.36, 1.01), i. e. patients with CVE had a MPV about 0.69 fL higher than non-CVE. Patients with higher MPV were about 12 % more likely to die than patients with lower MPV (RR 1.12; 95 %CI = 1.02–1.24). However, pooling these effects was based on high heterogeneity and the source of heterogeneity could not be identified. This might be explained by many differences among included studies (e. g. study population, outcomes of interest, analysate, time between blood collection and MPV analysis, etc). These findings suggest that MPV may be a useful prognostic marker in patients with CAD.

1 December 2017 in Sleep Medicine Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
VTVisasiri Tantrakul
Visasiri Tantrakul
PNPawin Numthavaj
Pawin Numthavaj
CGChristian Guilleminault
Christian Guilleminault
Mark McEvoyMark McEvoy
Mark McEvoy
PPPanyu Panburana
Panyu Panburana
ATAmmarin Thakkinstian
Ammarin Thakkinstian
This review aims to evaluate the performance of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening questionnaires during pregnancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using MEDLINE Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library. A bivariate meta-analysis was applied for pooling of diagnostic parameters. Six of the total 4719 articles met the inclusion criteria. The Berlin questionnaire (BQ, N = 604) and Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS, N = 420) were the most frequently used screening tools during pregnancy. The pooled prevalence of OSA during pregnancy was 26.7% (95%CI: 16.9%, 34.4%, I2 = 83.15%). BQ performance was poor to fair with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.66 (95%CI: 0.45, 0.83; I2 = 78.65%) and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.48, 0.75; I2 = 81.55%), respectively. BQ performance was heterogeneous depending on type of reference test and pregnancy. Sensitivity increased if diagnosis was based on polysomnography (0.90), and respiratory disturbance index (0.90). However, sensitivity decreased if screening was performed in early pregnancy (≤20 weeks gestation: 0.47), and high-risk pregnancy (0.44). Performance of ESS was poor with pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.44 (95%CI: 0.33, 0.56; I2 = 32.8%) and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.48, 0.75; I2 = 81.55%), respectively. In conclusion, BQ and ESS showed poor performance during pregnancy, hence a new OSA screening questionnaire is needed. Registration: PROSPERO registration CRD42015025848.

23 June 2022 in BMC Nephrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TSTunlanut Sapankaew
Tunlanut Sapankaew
KTKunlawat Thadanipon
Kunlawat Thadanipon
NRNarisa Ruenroengbun
Narisa Ruenroengbun
KCKamolpat Chaiyakittisopon
Kamolpat Chaiyakittisopon
AIAtiporn Ingsathit
Atiporn Ingsathit
ATAmmarin Thakkinstian
Ammarin Thakkinstian
Background: Asymptomatic hyperuricemia was found to be associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk but the potential benefits of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) with frequentist model to estimate the efficacy and safety of ULT in asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adults with asymptomatic hyperuricemia were eligible if they compared any pair of ULTs (i.e., allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, benzbromarone, sulfinpyrazone, rasburicase, lesinurad, and topiroxostat) and placebo or no ULT, and had outcomes of interest, including composite renal events, major adverse cardiovascular events, serum urate levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure, and adverse events. Results: NMA with frequentist approach was applied to estimate relative treatment effects, i.e., risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). A total of 23 RCTs were eligible. NMA identified beneficial effects of ULT on composite renal events and eGFR but not for other outcomes. Allopurinol and febuxostat had significantly lower composite renal events than placebo (RR 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.66, and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99, respectively). Both treatments also resulted in significantly higher eGFR than placebo (MD 3.69 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.08, and MD 2.89 ml/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI 0.69 to 5.09, respectively). No evidence of inconsistency was identified. Conclusions: Evidence suggests that allopurinol and febuxostat are the ULTs of choice in reducing composite renal events and improving renal function. Trial registration. This study was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019145908. The date of the first registration was 12th November 2019.

1 July 2019 in The American Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NPNapaphat Poprom
Napaphat Poprom
PNPawin Numthavaj
Pawin Numthavaj
CWChumpon Wilasrusmee
Chumpon Wilasrusmee
SRSasivimol Rattanasiri
Sasivimol Rattanasiri
JAJohn Attia
John Attia
ATAmmarin Thakkinstian
Ammarin Thakkinstian
The efficacy of antibiotics in appendicitis remains controversial, and physicians are not confident in prescribing antibiotics as the first line treatment. This network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of individual antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases since inception to July 2017. Network meta-analysis was applied to estimate treatment effects and safety. Probability of being the best treatment was estimated using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Among 9 RCTs meeting our inclusion criteria. A network meta-analysis indicated that those receiving antibiotics had about 12-32% lower chance of treatment success and lower risk of complication about 23-86%, especially Beta-lactamase than appendectomy. The overall appendicitis recurrence rate in the antibiotic group was about 18.2%. The SUCRA indicated that appendectomy was ranked first for treatment success and least complications, followed by Beta-lactamase. Appendectomy is still the most effective treatment in uncomplicated appendicitis but it carries complications. Beta-lactamase, might be an alternative treatment if there are any contraindications for operation.

1 November 2020 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ATAmarit Tansawet
Amarit Tansawet
PNPawin Numthavaj
Pawin Numthavaj
STSuphakarn Techapongsatorn
Suphakarn Techapongsatorn
CWChumpon Wilasrusmee
Chumpon Wilasrusmee
JAJohn Attia
John Attia
ATAmmarin Thakkinstian
Ammarin Thakkinstian
Mesh can be used to prevent incisional hernia (IH) occurrence. However, the effect of various mesh positions has never been compared. This study aimed to compare and rank the effect and safety of various mesh-augmented fascia closure techniques on hernia prophylaxis in midline laparotomy. MEDLINE and SCOPUS were searched from inception to December 2019. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were eligible if they met the following criteria: comparison of any of the following interventions: onlay (OM), retrorectus (RM), preperitoneal (PM), intraperitoneal mesh (IM) augmentation, and primary suture closure (PSC); and reporting on any of these outcomes: IH, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, and dehiscence. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. A two-stage random-effect network meta-analysis was performed, then intervention effects were pooled and ranked accordingly. A total of 20 RCTs were eligible. Only OM and RM showed a significantly lower risk of IH than PSC with pooled risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of 0.24 (0.12, 0.46) and 0.32 (0.16, 0.66), and number needed to treat (NNTs) of 4 and 5, respectively. However, OM showed a significantly higher risk of seroma than PSC (RR 2.21 (1.44, 3.39) with a number needed to harm (NNH) of 14). Most mesh placements showed a higher risk of wound infection, except for RM, but none of these was significantly different. All mesh techniques, except RM, showed a reduction in dehiscence, but again these were not significantly different. OM and RM provided the most effective IH prevention relative to PSC. However, OM had a higher rate of seroma than RM and PSC. Other complications, including wound infection, hematoma, and dehiscence, were not significantly observed among these fascia closure techniques.