The beam trawl is one of the primary operational trawls for Antarctic krill, and its beam provides horizontal expansion support for the trawl net. The hydrodynamic performance of the beam significantly affects the vertical expansion and sinking performance of the trawl, as well as impacts the energy consumption of the fishing vessel. In this study, the beam of the Antarctic krill trawl used on the “Shen Lan” fishing vessel served as a prototype. Three types of beams, cylindrical, airfoil, and elliptical, were designed. The hydrodynamic performances of beams with different shapes at different angles of attack were studied using numerical simulation, and the accuracy of the numerical simulation was validated through the flume test. The results show that the cylindrical beam has a higher drag coefficient and a lower lift coefficient, compared to the airfoil beam and the elliptical beam. Under different angles of attack, the cylindrical beam’s drag coefficient is, on average, 49.54% higher than that of the airfoil beam and 59.74% higher than that of the elliptical beam. Its lift coefficient is 87.79% lower than that of the airfoil beam and 85.06% lower than that of the elliptical beam, respectively. At different angles of attack, the hydrodynamic coefficients of the airfoil beam and the elliptical beam are similar, and their trends, with respect to the angle of attack, are generally consistent. The drag coefficients increase with an increasing angle of attack, while the lift coefficients show a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing with an increasing angle of attack. The absolute values of the lift coefficients for the airfoil beam and the elliptical beam both reach their maximum values at an angle of attack of 45°, with values of 0.703 and 0.473, respectively. Compared to the cylindrical beam, the hydrodynamic performances of the airfoil beam and elliptical beam are superior.

This article presents a summary of three common false-bottom occurrences in echosounder imaging based on an analysis of echosounder data. Utilizing the imaging principle of the echosounder, a comprehensive analysis was conducted and an explanation of each situation’s causes, imaging characteristics, impacts, and solutions is presented. Additionally, the article includes calculations to determine the precise location of the false bottom, which were subsequently validated through actual data collection. To address the two most impactful false-bottom scenarios in target detection, solutions are proposed from two perspectives. By accurately judging the position and imaging characteristics of these false bottoms, the article concludes with an analysis of the causes of false bottoms and presents corresponding solutions. The article aims to facilitate the rapid identification and elimination of false bottoms, thus mitigating their adverse effects on target detection.

The purpose of this study was to comprehend the escape intensity and its influencing factors in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) that escaped through large mesh located at the front end of commercial trawl nets. Two pocket nets were employed to collect escaped krill that passed through the mesh opening in the first section (400 mm mesh size, without liner) and second section (16 mm mesh size liner) of the trawl body. The results show that krill escape primarily took place in the first section of the trawl body. Meanwhile, there was almost no krill escape observed in the second section of the trawl body, primarily attributable to the presence of a 16 mm mesh size liner. In terms of body length composition, the average PSI (percentage similarity index) was 67.31 (95% CI: 61.86–72.87) for krill from the pocket net on the larger mesh part and the codend. In addition, the PSI was significantly different (p < 0.05) between the day (60.96, 95% CI: 55.68–66.71) and night (83.62, 95% CI: 76.80–89.46). The escape intensity of krill ranged from 20.83 to 213.13 g·m⁻² per ton per hour in the area at the front end of trawl body, with a mean value of 76.52 (95% CI: 55.22–101.09) g·m⁻² per ton per hour during the daytime, and 144.66 (95% CI: 110.44–180.03) g·m⁻² per ton per hour at night. These results indicate that krill can see and avoid contacting the netting easily during the day, particularly for larger individuals. This provides insight into the design of krill trawls, specifically on the arrangement of liners, which should be integrated from the front part of the trawl body.

Determination of bar spacing of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) should consider species composition and morphometric characteristics (particularly width) of target species krill and bycatch. This study conducted a scientific investigation of the finfish bycatch in the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) trawl fishery by the fishing vessel SHEN LAN in the waters surrounding the South Orkney Islands from December 24, 2022, to February 20, 2023. The results show that scientific observers sampled 676 individuals of finfish bycatch. Of these, 665 were identified to species (17 species from 8 families), while the remaining 11 specimen were juveniles of the Nototheniidae family that could not be identified to the species level. IRI (index of relative importance) calculations showed three dominant (IRI value greater than 1,000) finfish bycatch species (Champsocephalus gunnari, Pseudochaenichthys georgianus, and C. aceratus from the Channichthyidae family) and four important (IRI value between 1,000 and 100) finfish bycatch species (Electrona carlsbergi and Gymnoscopelus nicholsi from the Myctophidae family, Gobionotothen gibberifrons from the Nototheniidae family, and Notolepis coatsi from the Paralepididae family). Our study provides morphometric data (particularly body width) that is crucial to model the potential for bycatch reduction by use of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) and to determine the appropriate candidate bar spacings for BRD sea trials. Predictions suggest that a 10 mm (the maximum body width of krill) bar spacing releases a significant amount of dominant and important bycatch species (93.94% of C. gunnari, 53.99% of P. georgianus, 76.25% of C. aceratus, and 100% of G. gibberifrons). Reduced fishing pressure would reduce the risks to dominant and important bycatch species to make the krill fishery sustainable. We recommend that future BRD sea trials should initially test a 10 mm bar spacing. If marked loss of krill is observed, wider spacings (e.g. 15 mm) must be tested.