David Goldston

Dr. David Goldston

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 November 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDavid Goldston
David Goldston
VEValerie Ennis-Adeniran
Valerie Ennis-Adeniran
JHJoseph J. Hedden
Joseph J. Hedden
HGHarriet C. T. Groom
Harriet C. T. Groom
GRGillian I. Rice
Gillian I. Rice
MWMichelle Webb
Michelle Webb

16 September 2002 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PHPeter W. Haebel
Peter W. Haebel
DGDavid Goldston
David Goldston
FKFederico Katzen
Federico Katzen
JBJon Beckwith
Jon Beckwith
PMPeter Metcalf
Peter Metcalf
The Escherichia coli disulfide bond isomerase DsbC rearranges incorrect disulfide bonds during oxidative protein folding. It is specifically activated by the periplasmic N‐terminal domain (DsbDα) of the transmembrane electron transporter DsbD. An intermediate of the electron transport reaction was trapped, yielding a covalent DsbC–DsbDα complex. The 2.3 Å crystal structure of the complex shows for the first time the specific interactions between two thiol oxidoreductases. DsbDα is a novel thiol oxidoreductase with the active site cysteines embedded in an immunoglobulin fold. It binds into the central cleft of the V‐shaped DsbC dimer, which assumes a closed conformation on complex formation. Comparison of the complex with oxidized DsbDα reveals major conformational changes in a cap structure that regulates the accessibility of the DsbDα active site. Our results explain how DsbC is selectively activated by DsbD using electrons derived from the cytoplasm.

2 October 2015 in PLOS Pathogens
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LALaurence H. Arnold
Laurence H. Arnold
HGHarriet C. T. Groom
Harriet C. T. Groom
SKSimone Kunzelmann
Simone Kunzelmann
DSDavid Schwefel
David Schwefel
SCSarah J. Caswell
Sarah J. Caswell
KBKate Bishop
Kate Bishop
SAMHD1 restricts HIV-1 infection of myeloid-lineage and resting CD4+ T-cells. Most likely this occurs through deoxynucleoside triphosphate triphosphohydrolase activity that reduces cellular dNTP to a level where reverse transcriptase cannot function, although alternative mechanisms have been proposed recently. Here, we present combined structural and virological data demonstrating that in addition to allosteric activation and triphosphohydrolase activity, restriction correlates with the capacity of SAMHD1 to form “long-lived” enzymatically competent tetramers. Tetramer disruption invariably abolishes restriction but has varied effects on in vitro triphosphohydrolase activity. SAMHD1 phosphorylation also ablates restriction and tetramer formation but without affecting triphosphohydrolase steady-state kinetics. However phospho-SAMHD1 is unable to catalyse dNTP turnover under conditions of nucleotide depletion. Based on our findings we propose a model for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of SAMHD1 activity where dephosphorylation switches housekeeping SAMHD1 found in cycling cells to a high-activity stable tetrameric form that depletes and maintains low levels of dNTPs in differentiated cells. SAMHD1 is a restriction factor that blocks infection of certain immune cells by HIV-1. It was discovered to be an enzyme that catalyses the breakdown of dNTPs, suggesting that it inhibits HIV-1 replication by reducing cellular dNTP pools to such low levels that reverse transcriptase cannot function. However, recently, alternative mechanisms have been proposed. SAMHD1 is also regulated by phosphorylation, although the effects of phosphorylation on protein function are unclear. In order to address these issues, we carried out combined structural and virological studies and have demonstrated that in addition to allosteric activation and triphosphohydrolase activity, restriction correlates with the capacity of SAMHD1 to form “long-lived” enzymatically competent tetramers. Disrupting the tetramer in various ways always abolished restriction but had differing effects on enzyme activity in vitro. SAMHD1 phosphorylation also prevented restriction and tetramer formation but without affecting enzyme catalysis under steady-state dNTP conditions. However phosphorylated SAMHD1 was unable to catalyse dNTP turnover at very low nucleotide levels that more accurately represent conditions in the cells in which restriction takes place. Based on our findings we propose a model for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of SAMHD1 activity and substantiate that degradation of dNTPs by SAMHD1 is sufficient to restrict HIV-1.

16 June 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDavid Goldston
David Goldston
PWPhilip A. Walker
Philip A. Walker
LCLesley J. Calder
Lesley J. Calder
PCPeter J. Coombs
Peter J. Coombs
JKJoshua Kirkpatrick
Joshua Kirkpatrick
ITIan A. Taylor
Ian A. Taylor
Significance: Retroviral infection of cells can be blocked by the action of the postentry restriction factors. The Trim5α and Fv1 factors do so by targeting the capsid that surrounds the viral core. The nature of the interaction of these factors with the viral assembly is unclear. We show that these factors form antiparallel dimers that display specificity domains spaced to target motifs on the capsid lattice surface. In doing so Fv1 and Trim5α take advantage of the regularly spaced array of binding sites on the capsid surface, generating avidity to aid recognition of retroviral pathogens.

2 April 2001 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMartin W. Bader
Martin W. Bader
AHAnnie Hiniker
Annie Hiniker
JRJames Regeimbal
James Regeimbal
DGDavid Goldston
David Goldston
PHPeter W. Haebel
Peter W. Haebel
JBJames C.A. Bardwell
James C.A. Bardwell
There are two distinct pathways for disulfide formation in prokaryotes. The DsbA‐DsbB pathway introduces disulfide bonds de novo , while the DsbC‐DsbD pathway functions to isomerize disulfides. One of the key questions in disulfide biology is how the isomerase pathway is kept separate from the oxidase pathway in vivo . Cross‐talk between these two systems would be mutually destructive To force communication between these two systems we have selected dsbC mutants that complement a dsbA null mutation. In these mutants, DsbC is present as a monomer as compared with dimeric wild‐type DsbC. Based on these findings we rationally designed DsbC mutants in the dimerization domain. All of these mutants are able to rescue the dsbA null phenotype. Rescue depends on the presence of DsbB, the native re‐oxidant of DsbA, both in vivo and in vitro . Our results suggest that dimerization acts to protect DsbC's active sites from DsbB‐mediated oxidation. These results explain how oxidative and reductive pathways can co‐exist in the periplasm of Escherichia coli .

24 November 2009 in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDavid Goldston
David Goldston
Silas Granato Villas-BoasSilas Granato Villas-Boas
Silas Granato Villas-Boas
MTMarisa Till
Marisa Till
WKWilliam J. Kelly
William J. Kelly
GAGraeme T. Attwood
Graeme T. Attwood
VAVickery L. Arcus
Vickery L. Arcus