Marjan Golob

Prof. Dr. Marjan Golob

University of Maribor, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Maribor, Slovenia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2016 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDušan Strušnik
Dušan Strušnik
MMMilan Marčič
Milan Marčič
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob
AHAleš Hribernik
Aleš Hribernik
MŽMarija Živić
Marija Živić
JAJurij Avsec
Jurij Avsec

1 January 2003 in ISA Transactions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob
BTBoris Tovornik
Boris Tovornik

1 December 2001 in Applied Soft Computing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob

1 September 2015 in Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDušan Strušnik
Dušan Strušnik
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob
JAJurij Avsec
Jurij Avsec

1 October 2016 in Energy Conversion and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDušan Strušnik
Dušan Strušnik
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob
JAJurij Avsec
Jurij Avsec

21 April 2020 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Bogdan DugonikBogdan Dugonik
Bogdan Dugonik
ADAleksandra Dugonik
Aleksandra Dugonik
MMMaruska Marovt
Maruska Marovt
MGMarjan Golob
Marjan Golob
The fast-growing incidence of skin cancer, especially melanoma, is the guiding principle for intense development of various digital image-capturing devices providing easier recognition of melanoma by dermatologists. Handheld and digital dermoscopy, following of mole changes with smartphones and digital analysing of mole images, is based on evaluation of the colours, shape and deep structures in the skin moles. Incorrect colour information of an image, under- or overexposed images, lack of sharpness and low resolution of the images, can lead to melanoma misdiagnosis. The purpose of our study was to determine the colour error in the image according to the given lighting conditions and different camera settings. We focused on measuring the image quality parameters of smartphones and high-resolution cameras to compare them with the results of state-of-the-art dermoscopy device systems. We applied standardised measuring methods. The spatial frequency response method was applied for measuring the sharpness and resolution of the tested camera systems. Colour images with known reference values were captured from the test target, to evaluate colour error as a CIELAB (Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage) ΔE*ab colour difference as seen by a human observer. The results of our measurements yielded two significant findings. First, all tested cameras produced inaccurate colours when operating in automatic mode, and second, the amount of sharpening was too intensive. These deficiencies can be eliminated through adjusting the camera parameters manually or by image post-production. The presented two-step camera calibration procedure improves the colour accuracy of captured clinical and dermoscopy images significantly.