Pedro Brancoli

Pedro Brancoli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
Kamran RoustaKamran Rousta
Kamran Rousta
KBKim Bolton
Kim Bolton

1 November 2020 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
KBKim Bolton
Kim Bolton
MEMattias Eriksson
Mattias Eriksson
Bread waste represents a significant part of food waste in Sweden. At the same time, the return system established between bakeries and retailers enables a flow of bread waste that is not contaminated with other food waste products. This provides an opportunity for alternative valorisation and waste management options, in addition to the most common municipal waste treatment, namely anaerobic digestion and incineration. An attributional life cycle assessment of the management of 1 kg of surplus bread was conducted to assess the relative environmental impacts of alternative and existing waste management options. Eighteen impact categories were assessed using the ReCiPe methodology. The different management options that were investigated for the surplus bread are donation, use as animal feed, beer production, ethanol production, anaerobic digestion, and incineration. These results are also compared to reducing the production of bread by the amount of surplus bread (reduction at the source). The results support a waste hierarchy where reduction at the source has the highest environmental savings, followed by use of surplus bread as animal feed, donation, for beer production and for ethanol production. Anaerobic digestion and incineration offer the lowest environmental savings, particularly in a low-impact energy system. The results suggests that Sweden can make use of the established return system to implement environmentally preferred options for the management of surplus bread.

1 August 2019 in Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
MLMagnus Lundin
Magnus Lundin
KBKim Bolton
Kim Bolton
MEMattias Eriksson
Mattias Eriksson

1 August 2020 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniele Eckert Matzembacher
Daniele Eckert Matzembacher
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
LMLaís Moltene Maia
Laís Moltene Maia
MEMattias Eriksson
Mattias Eriksson
Reducing food waste is necessary for achieving healthy diets and sustainable food systems due to its negative impacts on resource conservation, food security, and environmental, social and economic costs. This paper aim is to quantify the amount and types of food that is wasted by the consumers in different restaurant configurations. The second aim is to understand the reasons which lead them to waste food and the greenhouse gas emissions associated with the waste. To fulfil the aims, a mixed methodology was used, including primary data collection in restaurants for the quantification of food waste, interviewing consumers and staff, along with calculating the environmental impact from the waste using life cycle assessment. The results show that different incentives and levels of interaction in consumer's choice of food types exert influence on plate food waste. When incentive and interaction are low, the amount of food waste is larger. It is the case of a la carte restaurants. The best performance in the restaurant categories was when both incentive and level of interaction were higher. Buffet where the consumers pay by weight, therefore, is the configuration that generates less food waste on the consumer's plate. The main wasted products are rice and beans, followed by beef, and then other carbohydrates. The life cycle assessment indicated a carbon footprint varying from 128 to 324 g CO2 eq./plate from the wasted food. The result of the interviews showed that the food waste on the plate is not visible to consumers, since in the majority of cases, they believe that their food waste on the plate in the day of the observation was an exception. There is a large potential to reduce food waste by giving consumers the possibility to influence the serving to get the right portion size. Also, to further emphasize this behaviour by creating incentives for consumers only to serve as much food as they actually eat.

29 April 2024 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Aida HosseinianAida Hosseinian
Aida Hosseinian
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
NVNaeimeh Vali
Naeimeh Vali
Jenni Ylä-MellaJenni Ylä-Mella
Jenni Ylä-Mella
Anita PetterssonAnita Pettersson
Anita Pettersson
EPEva Pongrácz
Eva Pongrácz

30 August 2021 in Fermentation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPedro Brancoli
Pedro Brancoli
RGRebecca Gmoser
Rebecca Gmoser
Mohammad J. TaherzadehMohammad J. Taherzadeh
Mohammad J. Taherzadeh
KBKim Bolton
Kim Bolton
The use of food waste as feedstock in the manufacture of high-value products is a promising avenue to contribute to circular economy. Considering that the majority of environmental impacts of products are determined in the early phases of product development, it is crucial to integrate life cycle assessment during these phases. This study integrates environmental considerations in the development of solid-state fermentation based on the cultivation of N. intermedia for the production of a fungal food product using surplus bread as a substrate. The product can be sold as a ready-to-eat meal to reduce waste while generating additional income. Four inoculation scenarios were proposed, based on the use of bread, molasses, and glucose as substrate, and one scenario based on backslopping. The environmental performance was assessed, and the quality of the fungal product was evaluated in terms of morphology and protein content. The protein content of the fungal food product was similar in all scenarios, varying from 25% to 29%. The scenario based on backslopping showed the lowest environmental impacts while maintaining high protein content. The results show that the inoculum production and the solid-state fermentation are the two environmental hotspots and should be in focus when optimizing the process.