To assess the agreement between the Eye Refract, an instrument to perform subjective automated refraction, and the traditional subjective refraction, as the gold standard, in young hyperopes under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. A cross-section and randomized study was carried out, involving 42 participants (18.2 ± 7.7 years, range 6 to 31 years). Only one eye was chosen for the analysis, randomly. An optometrist conducted the refraction with the Eye Refract, while another different optometrist conducted the traditional subjective refraction. Spherical equivalent (M), cylindrical components (J0 and J45), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were compared between both refraction methods under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions. A Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the agreement (accuracy and precision) between both refraction methods. Without cycloplegia, the Eye Refract showed significantly lower values of hyperopia than the traditional subjective refraction (p < 0.009), the mean difference (accuracy) and its 95% limits of agreement (precision) being -0.31 (+0.85, -1.47) D. Conversely, there were no statistical differences between both refraction methods under cycloplegic conditions (p ≥ 0.05). Regarding J0 and J45, both refraction methods manifested no significant differences between them under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions (p ≥ 0.05). Finally, the Eye Refract significantly improved CDVA (0.04 ± 0.01 logMAR) compared with the traditional subjective refraction without cycloplegia (p = 0.01). The Eye Refract is presented as a useful instrument to determine the refractive error in young hyperopes, the use of cycloplegia being necessary to obtain accurate and precise spherical refraction.

The aim of this study is to analyze the anterior and posterior corneal surface shape and the corneal thickness difference outcomes between before and after scleral lens (ScCL) wear in post-LASIK ectasia subjects for one year. Twenty eyes with post-LASIK ectasia wearing scleral lenses were evaluated in a visit before contact lens and after 1, 6, and 12 months. The study variables analyzed included the apex, nasal, temporal, inferior, and superior corneal thickness; the anterior and posterior surface corneal at corneal diameters of 8, 6, 4, and 2 mm, and high-contrast visual acuity. A statistically significant increment of corneal thickness (p < 0.05) was observed in the inferior area after 6 months and in the superior area in the 12-month follow-up after wearing ScCLs. The anterior corneal curvature presented a flattening and a statistically significant steepening (p < 0.05) in the central and peripheral radii, respectively, after one year. The posterior corneal curvature showed a significant (p < 0.05) steepening, which mainly affected the central region after one year. Despite these changes, high-contrast visual acuity with ScCL correction remained at the same values. The prolonged use of scleral lenses in post-LASIK subjects showed significant changes in the corneal curvature and thickness. These outcomes recommend more detailed and periodic topographic and vision quality checks to monitor the wear in ScCL patients.

Background: Since accommodation may be a source of error affecting the inter-optometrist repeatability of subjective refraction, this study investigated whether the use of cycloplegia could improve this repeatability. Methods: A randomized cross-sectional study was conducted on 42 young hyperopes (18.2 ± 7.7 years, range 6 to 31 years). Subjective refraction was performed by two different optometrists in two measurement sessions: one day without cycloplegia and, on a different day, with cycloplegia, in random order. The inter-optometrist repeatability of all refractive variables (M, J0, and J45) was analyzed, selecting one eye randomly, in terms of the 95% confidence interval of repeatability (r). Results: No statistically significant differences were found between the optometrists for any refractive variable, both with and without cycloplegia (p ≥ 0.05). Furthermore, no correlation was found between participants’ age and the refractive differences between optometrists under both cycloplegic conditions (p ≥ 0.05). However, the use of cycloplegia improved the inter-optometrist repeatability of M (r = 0.37 D) compared to the non-cycloplegic measurements (r = 0.62 D). Conclusions: These results suggest that accommodation in young hyperopes is likely a primary source of error that could explain the discrepancies in subjective refraction between optometrists.

Objectives: To compare the objective refraction of young hyperopes obtained by two wavefront autorefractors with identical measurement principles but different optical designs: a monocular closed-field (VX 120) and a binocular open-field (Eye Refract), both developed by the same manufacturer (Visionix; Pont-de-l’Arche, France). Methods: A randomized, cross-sectional study was carried out with 37 hyperopic participants (18.2 ± 7.8 years; range 8 to 31 years). Each participant underwent two measurement sessions (one with and one without cycloplegia), during which three measurements were taken per autorefractor (monocular and binocular). Refractive variables (M, J0, and J45) were analyzed in one randomly selected eye. Results: The spherical equivalent (M) showed significant differences between autorefractors under noncycloplegic and cycloplegic conditions (p < 0.001). Without cycloplegia, the binocular autorefractor measured +0.45 (+1.49, −0.58) D more hyperopia than the monocular device. Under cycloplegia, this difference decreased to +0.26 D (+0.99, −0.48) D. Both autorefractors provided higher hyperopia with cycloplegia, with differences inversely correlated with age (r = −0.4; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Whenever possible, refraction in young hyperopes should be measured under cycloplegic conditions using a binocular open-field autorefractor to promote greater accommodative relaxation and ensure more reliable hyperopia measurements in both clinical practice and research.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate changes in corneal thickness and anterior and posterior corneal curvature after one year of scleral lens wear in keratoconus eyes and to determine their impact on visual performance. Methods: Sixty-five keratoconus subjects were divided into two groups: with intrastromal corneal ring segments (KC-ICRS) and without ICRS (KC). All participants wore 16.5 mm scleral lenses for 8 h daily over 1 year. Measurements included corneal thickness, anterior and posterior curvature, and high-contrast visual acuity assessed before and after lens wear. Results: Corneal thicknesses increased significantly in the superior region of the KC-ICRS group. In curvature analysis, the KC group showed inferior steepening and superior flattening, while the KC-ICRS group exhibited central and superior-nasal anterior flattening. Posterior curvature changes included central flattening and peripheral steepening. Visual acuity remained stable across all visits and groups. Conclusions: Long-term scleral lens wear induced measurable morphological changes, including increased superior corneal thickness and region-specific curvature alterations, which varied by ICRS presence. These changes did not compromise visual acuity, supporting scleral lenses as a safe and effective option for sustained vision correction in keratoconus. The findings highlight the importance of personalized fitting and monitoring strategies in clinical practice.