xiadong li

Dr. xiadong li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 December 2023 in Journal of Bone Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YYYuguang Ye
Yuguang Ye
YCYusi Chen
Yusi Chen
DZDaxin Zhu
Daxin Zhu
YHYifeng Huang
Yifeng Huang
XLxiadong li
xiadong li
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
Background and objective: Due to their aggressive nature and poor prognosis, malignant femoral bone tumors present considerable hurdles. Early treatment commencement is essential for enhancing vital and practical outcomes. In this investigation, deep learning algorithms will be used to analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to identify bone tumors that are malignant. Methodology: The study cohort included 44 patients, with ages ranging from 17 to 78 (22 women and 22 males). To categorize T1 and T2 weighted MRI data, this paper presents an improved DenseNet network model for the classification of bone tumor MRI, which is named GHA-DenseNet. Based on the original DenseNet model, the attention module is added to solve the problem that the deep convolutional model can reduce the loss of key features when capturing the location and content information of femoral bone tumor tissue due to the limitation of local receptive field. In addition, the sparse connection mode is used to prune the connection mode of the original model, so as to remove unnecessary and retain more useful fast connection mode, and alleviate the overfitting problem caused by small dataset size and image characteristics. In a clinical model designed to anticipate tumor malignancy, the utilization of T1 and T2 classifier output values, in combination with patientspecific clinical information, was a crucial component. Results: The T1 classifier's accuracy during the training phase was 92.88% whereas the T2 classifier's accuracy was 87.03%. Both classifiers demonstrated accuracy of 95.24% throughout the validation phase. During training and validation, the clinical model's accuracy was 82.17% and 81.51%, respectively. The clinical model's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated its capacity to separate classes. Conclusions: The proposed method does not require manual segmentation of MRI scans because it makes use of pretrained deep learning classifiers. These algorithms have the ability to predict tumor malignancy and shorten the diagnostic and therapeutic turnaround times. Although the procedure only needs a little amount of radiologists' involvement, more testing on a larger patient cohort is required to confirm its efficacy.

31 January 2024 in Frontiers in Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FYFengsong Ye
Fengsong Ye
LXLixia Xu
Lixia Xu
YRYao Ren
Yao Ren
BXBing Xia
Bing Xia
XCXueqin Chen
Xueqin Chen
XLxiadong li
xiadong li
Purpose: This study aims to develop an optimal machine learning model that uses lung equivalent uniform dose (lung EUD to predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) occurrence in lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 77 patients diagnosed with locally advanced squamous cell lung cancer (LASCLC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with VMAT. Patients were categorized based on the onset of grade II or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP 2+). Dose volume histogram data, extracted from the treatment planning system, were used to compute the lung EUD values for both groups using a specialized numerical analysis code. We identified the parameter α, representing the most significant relative difference in lung EUD between the two groups. The predictive potential of variables for RP2+, including physical dose metrics, lung EUD, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) from the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model, and lung EUD-calibrated NTCP for affected and whole lung, underwent both univariate and multivariate analyses. Relevant variables were then employed as inputs for machine learning models: multiple logistic regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN). Each model's performance was gauged using the area under the curve (AUC), determining the best-performing model.Results: The optimal α-value for lung EUD was 0.3, maximizing the relative lung EUD difference between the RP 2+ and non-RP 2+ groups. A strong correlation coefficient of 0.929 (P< 0.01) was observed between lung EUD (α = 0.3) and physical dose metrics. When examining predictive capabilities, lung EUD-based NTCP for the affected lung (AUC: 0.862) and whole lung (AUC: 0.815) surpassed LKB-based NTCP for the respective lungs. The decision tree (DT) model using lung EUD-based predictors emerged as the superior model, achieving an AUC of 0.98 in both training and validation datasets.Discussions: The likelihood of developing RP 2+ has shown a significant correlation with the advancements in RT technology. From traditional 3-D conformal RT, lung cancer treatment methodologies have transitioned to sophisticated techniques like static IMRT. Accurately deriving such a dose–effect relationship through NTCP modeling of RP incidence is statistically challenging due to the increased number of degrees-of-freedom. To the best of our knowledge, many studies have not clarified the rationale behind setting the α-value to 0.99 or 1, despite the closely aligned calculated lung EUD and lung mean dose MLD. Perfect independence among variables is rarely achievable in real-world scenarios. Four prominent machine learning algorithms were used to devise our prediction models. The inclusion of lung EUD-based factors substantially enhanced their predictive performance for RP 2+. Our results advocate for the decision tree model with lung EUD-based predictors as the optimal prediction tool for VMAT-treated lung cancer patients. Which could replace conventional dosimetric parameters, potentially simplifying complex neural network structures in prediction models.