Jianbing Xiahou

Prof. Dr. Jianbing Xiahou

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 March 2022 in Knowledge-Based Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YLYuanguo Lin
Yuanguo Lin
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
WZWenhua Zeng
Wenhua Zeng
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
LLLi Li
Li Li
CMChunyan Miao
Chunyan Miao

25 October 2022 in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XCXu Cui
Xu Cui
YWYongrong Wu
Yongrong Wu
JWJipeng Wu
Jipeng Wu
ZYZhiyu You
Zhiyu You
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
MOMenglin Ouyang
Menglin Ouyang
Music plays an essential role in human life and can act as an expression to evoke human emotions. The diversity of music makes the listener's experience of music appear diverse. Different music can induce various emotions, and the same theme can also generate other feelings related to the listener's current psychological state. Music emotion recognition (MER) has recently attracted widespread attention in academics and industry. With the development of brain science, MER has been widely used in different fields, e.g., recommendation systems, automatic music composing, psychotherapy, and music visualization. Especially with the rapid development of artificial intelligence, deep learning-based music emotion recognition is gradually becoming mainstream. Besides, electroencephalography (EEG) enables external devices to sense neurophysiological signals in the brain without surgery. This non-invasive brain-computer signal has been used to explore emotions. This paper surveys EEG music emotional analysis, involving the analysis process focused on the music emotion analysis method, e.g., data processing, emotion model, and feature extraction. Then, challenging problems and development trends of EEG-based music emotion recognition is proposed. Finally, the whole paper is summarized.

13 April 2016 in Multimedia Tools and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
ZXZhuxiang Xu
Zhuxiang Xu

26 January 2023 in Knowledge-Based Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLi Li
Li Li
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
SSSong-Zhi Su
Song-Zhi Su

22 July 2022 in Knowledge-Based Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LLLi Li
Li Li
FLFan Lin
Fan Lin
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
YLYuanguo Lin
Yuanguo Lin
PWPengcheng Wu
Pengcheng Wu
YLYong Liu
Yong Liu

29 December 2023 in Journal of Bone Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YYYuguang Ye
Yuguang Ye
YCYusi Chen
Yusi Chen
DZDaxin Zhu
Daxin Zhu
YHYifeng Huang
Yifeng Huang
XLxiadong li
xiadong li
JXJianbing Xiahou
Jianbing Xiahou
Background and objective: Due to their aggressive nature and poor prognosis, malignant femoral bone tumors present considerable hurdles. Early treatment commencement is essential for enhancing vital and practical outcomes. In this investigation, deep learning algorithms will be used to analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to identify bone tumors that are malignant. Methodology: The study cohort included 44 patients, with ages ranging from 17 to 78 (22 women and 22 males). To categorize T1 and T2 weighted MRI data, this paper presents an improved DenseNet network model for the classification of bone tumor MRI, which is named GHA-DenseNet. Based on the original DenseNet model, the attention module is added to solve the problem that the deep convolutional model can reduce the loss of key features when capturing the location and content information of femoral bone tumor tissue due to the limitation of local receptive field. In addition, the sparse connection mode is used to prune the connection mode of the original model, so as to remove unnecessary and retain more useful fast connection mode, and alleviate the overfitting problem caused by small dataset size and image characteristics. In a clinical model designed to anticipate tumor malignancy, the utilization of T1 and T2 classifier output values, in combination with patientspecific clinical information, was a crucial component. Results: The T1 classifier's accuracy during the training phase was 92.88% whereas the T2 classifier's accuracy was 87.03%. Both classifiers demonstrated accuracy of 95.24% throughout the validation phase. During training and validation, the clinical model's accuracy was 82.17% and 81.51%, respectively. The clinical model's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated its capacity to separate classes. Conclusions: The proposed method does not require manual segmentation of MRI scans because it makes use of pretrained deep learning classifiers. These algorithms have the ability to predict tumor malignancy and shorten the diagnostic and therapeutic turnaround times. Although the procedure only needs a little amount of radiologists' involvement, more testing on a larger patient cohort is required to confirm its efficacy.