Under the new wave of scientific and technological revolution, the construction industry finds itself with a critical need to alter the traditional and outdated production mode through technological innovation in order to realize industry transformation and move towards a new era characterized by digitalization, informatization, and intelligence. As intelligent construction is the indispensable pathway for the transformation and upgrading of the construction industry, it is of great significance to conduct in-depth research on its evaluation indicators and causality. This paper adopts the system dynamics method, based on the overall structure of intelligent construction, extracts the causality chain and causal feedback loop of intelligent construction, and presents a causality diagram and system dynamics diagram to build a robust system dynamics model for intelligent construction. On this basis, an evaluation index system for intelligent construction is constructed from the five dimensions—investment, design, construction, operation, and environment—for a holistic assessment of the current state of intelligent construction. The research aims to provide a valuable reference for professionals focusing on intelligent construction and the broader development of the industry.

In smart construction, identifying the competencies required of engineering–procurement–construction (EPC) safety directors is important for improving personnel selection, training, and safety-governance effectiveness. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory, this study develops an exploratory competency framework for EPC safety directors in smart-construction contexts. A mixed-method design was adopted, combining a structured literature review, bibliometric mapping with CiteSpace, semistructured interviews, expert review, and questionnaire-based item screening. Questionnaire data from 189 valid respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, item analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and KMO/Bartlett tests to preliminarily assess the internal consistency and structural suitability of the proposed indicators. The results indicate that the retained exploratory framework comprises three higher-order dimensions—sensing, seizing, and reconfiguring—covering six competency elements and eighteen indicators after the remaining trend-sensing indicator was integrated into data analytics. Compared with conventional safety-management competency frameworks, the proposed framework places greater emphasis on data analytics, intelligent systems application, and cross-departmental coordination in digitally enabled project environments. The framework can be implemented as a role-profile template for recruitment, training-needs diagnosis, and performance appraisal of EPC safety directors, while further empirical validation is required before it is used as a standardized measurement scale.

This study proposes a quality-aware multimodal framework for health-state assessment and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction of cold-region tunnels. The framework integrates structural-response, environmental, apparent-defect, and engineering-inspectiondata, with the apparent-defect pathway jointly encoding raw images through a convolutional neural network and structured defect variables. Five data-quality dimensions-completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and traceability are incorporated intoreliability-guided multimodal fusion. Their base weights were re-audited through two rounds of expert consultation, each comprising 323 valid questionnaires. The Cr-weighted group analytic hierarchy process yielded weights of 0.0548, 0.1326, 0.1372, 0.2279, and 0.4474, respectively, with a group consistency ratio of 0.0455; the ranking remained stable under one-at-a-time +10% perturbations. In the primary tunnel case study, the framework achieved 89.7% health-state accuracy, a 6.3% RUL mean absolute percentage error, and 84.1% accuracy under Gaussian perturbation of standardized numerical inputs at a noise scale of 0.15. To further examine the reliability contribution of data-quality information, an independent field panel comprising 600 segment-month observations from 25 segments across three operational tunnels was evaluated using target-excluded specifications, two-way fixed effects, leave-one-tunnel-out validation, multiple baseline models, and five fixed random seeds. A one-standard-deviation increase in lagged quality instability was associated with a 0.0151 increase in the subsequent state-error index (95% CI: 0.0118-0.0184; p < 0.001). In cross-tunnel random-forest tests, incorporating quality information increased mean R² from 0.8277 to 0.8323 for state-error prediction and from 0.8517 to 0.8673 for RUL-contraction prediction, with both improvements significant in paired tests (p < 0.001). Split-conformal intervals achieved mean cross-tunnel coverage of 95.8% and 95.9%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that data-quality information provides a modest but statistically supported improvement in cross-tunnel reliability, whilethe principal contribution lies in integrating auditable data governance, reliability-aware fusion, and engineering decision support within a unified tunnel health-management framework.