Peter Reimann

Peter Reimann

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 October 2010
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann

2 July 2016 in Learning: Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann
This paper argues that learning analytics (LA) can make contributions to learning research, in addition to aiming for improvements in learning and teaching practices in a solely applied sense. Indeed, there is potential for transforming learning research if certain approaches developed in LA were used more extensively to study learning. The potential to advance learning research is explored along four dimensions: (1) data quantity, (2) longitudinal data, (3) data from multiple levels, and (4) data from multiple locations. This is followed by a description of how design-based research as practised in the learning sciences can serve as a bridge to LA, and how it would transform LA into a methodology that is also useful for advancing theories and models of learning.

2 May 2022 in Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JKJudy Kay
Judy Kay
KBKathryn Bartimote
Kathryn Bartimote
KKKirsty Kitto
Kirsty Kitto
BKBob Kummerfeld
Bob Kummerfeld
DLDanny Liu
Danny Liu
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann

24 August 2021 in Advances in Health Sciences Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CRChris Roberts
Chris Roberts
PKPriya Khanna
Priya Khanna
ALAndrew Stuart Lane
Andrew Stuart Lane
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann
LSLambert Schuwirth
Lambert Schuwirth

24 November 2023 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FHFlorian Hermann
Florian Hermann
AMAndreas Michalowski
Andreas Michalowski
TBTim Brünnette
Tim Brünnette
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann
SVSabrina Vogt
Sabrina Vogt
TGThomas Graf
Thomas Graf
Laser-based directed energy deposition using metal powder (DED-LB/M) offers great potential for a flexible production mainly defined by software. To exploit this potential, knowledge of the process parameters required to achieve a specific track geometry is essential. Existing analytical, numerical, and machine-learning approaches, however, are not yet able to predict the process parameters in a satisfactory way. A trial-&-error approach is therefore usually applied to find the best process parameters. This paper presents a novel user-centric decision-making workflow, in which several combinations of process parameters that are most likely to yield the desired track geometry are proposed to the user. For this purpose, a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) model, which has the advantage of including uncertainty quantification (UQ), was trained with experimental data to predict the geometry of single DED tracks based on the process parameters. The inherent UQ of the GPR together with the expert knowledge of the user can subsequently be leveraged for the inverse question of finding the best sets of process parameters by minimizing the expected squared deviation between target and actual track geometry. The GPR was trained and validated with a total of 379 cross sections of single tracks and the benefit of the workflow is demonstrated by two exemplary use cases.

11 December 2010
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
PRPeter Reimann
Peter Reimann
KYKalina Yacef
Kalina Yacef
JKJudy Kay
Judy Kay