Sara M. Lewis

Prof. Sara M. Lewis


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008 in Annual Review of Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSara M. Lewis
Sara M. Lewis
CCChristopher K. Cratsley
Christopher K. Cratsley
Many key advances in our understanding of firefly biology and signaling have been made over the past two decades. Here we review this recent research, which includes new phylogenetic results that shed light on the evolution of courtship signal diversity within the family Lampyridae, new insights into firefly flash control, and the discovery of firefly nuptial gifts. We present a comprehensive overview of sexual selection in lampyrids, including evidence from Photinus fireflies that females choose their mates on the basis of male flash signals, and discuss the importance of examining both precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in this group. Finally, we review recent findings on firefly chemical defenses, and discuss their implications for flash signal evolution in response to generalist predators as well as specialist predatory fireflies. This review provides new insight into how firefly flash signals have been shaped by the dual evolutionary processes of sexual selection (mate choice) and natural selection (predation), and proposes several exciting directions for future research.

16 October 2018 in eLife
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TFTimothy R Fallon
Timothy R Fallon
Sarah LowerSarah Lower
Sarah Lower
CCChing-Ho Chang
Ching-Ho Chang
MBManabu Bessho-Uehara
Manabu Bessho-Uehara
GMGavin Martin
Gavin Martin
JWJing-Ke Weng
Jing-Ke Weng
Fireflies and their luminous courtships have inspired centuries of scientific study. Today firefly luciferase is widely used in biotechnology, but the evolutionary origin of bioluminescence within beetles remains unclear. To shed light on this long-standing question, we sequenced the genomes of two firefly species that diverged over 100 million-years-ago: the North AmericanPhotinus pyralisand JapaneseAquatica lateralis.To compare bioluminescent origins, we also sequenced the genome of a related click beetle, the CaribbeanIgnelater luminosus, with bioluminescent biochemistry near-identical to fireflies, but anatomically unique light organs, suggesting the intriguing hypothesis of parallel gains of bioluminescence. Our analyses support independent gains of bioluminescence in fireflies and click beetles, and provide new insights into the genes, chemical defenses, and symbionts that evolved alongside their luminous lifestyle.

1 February 2020 in BioScience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SLSara M. Lewis
Sara M. Lewis
CWChoong Hay Wong
Choong Hay Wong
AOAvalon C S Owens
Avalon C S Owens
CFCandace Fallon
Candace Fallon
SJSarina Jepsen
Sarina Jepsen
JRJ Michael Reed
J Michael Reed
Insect declines and their drivers have attracted considerable recent attention. Fireflies and glowworms are iconic insects whose conspicuous bioluminescent courtship displays carry unique cultural significance, giving them economic value as ecotourist attractions. Despite evidence of declines, a comprehensive review of the conservation status and threats facing the approximately 2000 firefly species worldwide is lacking. We conducted a survey of experts from diverse geographic regions to identify the most prominent perceived threats to firefly population and species persistence. Habitat loss, light pollution, and pesticide use were regarded as the most serious threats, although rankings differed substantially across regions. Our survey results accompany a comprehensive review of current evidence concerning the impact of these stressors on firefly populations. We also discuss risk factors likely to increase the vulnerability of certain species to particular threats. Finally, we highlight the need to establish monitoring programs to track long-term population trends for at-risk firefly taxa.

21 April 2008 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TFTatyana Y. Fedina
Tatyana Y. Fedina
SLSara M. Lewis
Sara M. Lewis

13 April 2011 in Biological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAdam South
Adam South
SLSara M. Lewis
Sara M. Lewis

1 July 2014 in Biology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSara M. Lewis
Sara M. Lewis
KVKarim Vahed
Karim Vahed
JKJoris M. Koene
Joris M. Koene
LELeif Engqvist
Leif Engqvist
LBLuc F. Bussière
Luc F. Bussière
Gerlind UC LehmannGerlind UC Lehmann
Gerlind UC Lehmann
Uniquely positioned at the intersection of sexual selection, nutritional ecology and life-history theory, nuptial gifts are widespread and diverse. Despite extensive empirical study, we still have only a rudimentary understanding of gift evolution because we lack a unified conceptual framework for considering these traits. In this opinion piece, we tackle several issues that we believe have substantively hindered progress in this area. Here, we: (i) present a comprehensive definition and classification scheme for nuptial gifts (including those transferred by simultaneous hermaphrodites), (ii) outline evolutionary predictions for different gift types, and (iii) highlight some research directions to help facilitate progress in this field.