Vincenzo Alfano

Dr. Vincenzo Alfano

Agriculture and Environment Research Center, CREA - Council for Agriculture Research and Economics, Rome, Lazio, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2017 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LPL. Pari
L. Pari
Alessandro SuardiAlessandro Suardi
Alessandro Suardi
ESE. Santangelo
E. Santangelo
DGDaniel Garcia-Galindo
Daniel Garcia-Galindo
ASA. Scarfone
A. Scarfone
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano

18 September 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppe ToscanoGiuseppe Toscano
Giuseppe Toscano
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano
Antonio ScarfoneAntonio Scarfone
Antonio Scarfone
Luigi PariLuigi Pari
Luigi Pari
The goal of this work was to test a patented pruning harvester and a mobile pelleting system specifically designed for the vineyard agripellet chain. Biomass was characterized before and after storage and after the pelleting stage. The performance, the fuel consumption, and the work quality of the harvester were assessed together with the productivity and the power consumption of the mobile pelleting system. Production costs of pellet were estimated for the whole logistic chain, considering two scenarios: Storage and pelleting directly at the farm site or at a dedicated location at variable distance from the fields. For comparison, the direct production of chips without pelleting was considered. Results indicate that harvester performance was quite good and comparable with commercial solutions; the chips produced exhibited excellent storage performance, allowing direct pelleting without forced drying; the pellet quality was good comparable with that produced from forestry biomass. From an economic point of view, in-field pelleting was the most cost-effective solution, with a good margin of profit up to 57€ t−1; on the other hand, when transport to an intermediate storage center is necessary, profit margin reduces gradually and fades off at an average 50 km distance from the fields.

1 November 2015 in Industrial Crops and Products
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ESEnrico Santangelo
Enrico Santangelo
ASA. Scarfone
A. Scarfone
AGA. Del Giudice
A. Del Giudice
AAA. Acampora
A. Acampora
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano
Luigi PariLuigi Pari
Luigi Pari

10 August 2019 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandro SuardiAlessandro Suardi
Alessandro Suardi
Simone BergonzoliSimone Bergonzoli
Simone Bergonzoli
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano
Antonio ScarfoneAntonio Scarfone
Antonio Scarfone
Luigi PariLuigi Pari
Luigi Pari
A big amount of agricultural residues are generated from crop production and partially remain in the field after harvest. Removing the excess of residues after crop harvesting can increase farmer income, providing feedstock that could be used for industrial and energy purposes. The costs for collection and transport of straw and stalks are site- and region-specific and depend on the availability of agricultural residue and on how much of the residue is removed from any specific field or location. If the biomass is baled then it is required to upload the bales on a trailer, transport and unload all the baled biomass to the storage center. On the other hand, if a self-loading wagon is used the loose biomass collected, it must be unloaded every time the wagon is completely full. The distance and the harvesting system used influence the costs and should be analytically studied to avoid turning a possible profit into a disadvantageous business. The research represents a real case study to evaluate, which is the maximum distance to the biomass logistic center from which it is more economically convenient to gather the wheat and corn residues in bales instead of using a self-loading wagon. The results show a lower harvesting unitary cost for the self-loading forage wagon respect to the baling system. Although the study showed delivery distances over 11.4 km for wheat straw and 16.0 km for maize stalks, the use of the self-loading forage wagon is no longer convenient, and baling is the preferred harvesting system.

1 July 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Francesco LatteriniFrancesco Latterini
Francesco Latterini
WSWalter Stefanoni
Walter Stefanoni
Alessandro SuardiAlessandro Suardi
Alessandro Suardi
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano
Simone BergonzoliSimone Bergonzoli
Simone Bergonzoli
Luigi PariLuigi Pari
Luigi Pari
The valorization of agricultural residues plays a fundamental role in renewable energy production. Particularly, the management of olive orchards in Lazio region generates a considerable amount of biomass that is currently unexploited, but it could represent a valid source of solid biofuel for energy production in the Lazio region (Italy). Using a Geographic Information System (GIS) approach entirely based on open source software, five suitable areas (A, B, C, D and E) have been selected as eligible for hosting and feeding a 1 MWe power plant. Harvesting and transportation costs were also calculated. The harvesting operation costs were EUR 96.79 Mgfm−1 in A, while they ranged from EUR 49.83 Mgfm−1 (E) up to EUR 56.51 Mgfm−1 (D) for the other sub-areas. Sub-area A showed also higher transport costs, EUR 21.55 Mgfm−1 while the same value ranged from EUR 14.75 Mgfm−1 (E) to EUR 16.59 Mgfm−1 (B) in the other sub-areas. However harvesting costs resulted higher than those reported in the literature, mainly due to the low pruning yield per surface unit, an aspect which is directly related to the olive grove’s management in the region where annual pruning is the usual practice. Future developments of the present study should encompass the social and environmental aspects of residual biomass supply chains herein proposed.

14 March 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Alessandro SuardiAlessandro Suardi
Alessandro Suardi
Francesco LatteriniFrancesco Latterini
Francesco Latterini
Vincenzo AlfanoVincenzo Alfano
Vincenzo Alfano
Nadia PalmieriNadia Palmieri
Nadia Palmieri
Simone BergonzoliSimone Bergonzoli
Simone Bergonzoli
Luigi PariLuigi Pari
Luigi Pari
Pruning residues could represent an important biomass resources for energy production. Only in Italy it has been estimated that an annual quantity of biomass of over 2600 kt of dry matter could be obtained from olive residues. Several machines developed for pruning harvesting are available in the market, most of which are tractor-driven, while limited knowledge is available on performance, quality of work and costs of harvesting logistics based on stationary chippers. The aim of the present paper is to analyze machine performance of a forestry stationary chipper applied to pruning harvesting for what concerns work productivity, quality of the comminuted product and harvesting operating costs. This system is actually applied by Fiusis Company, an Italian enterprise which manages a biomass power plant exclusively powered by olive trees’ pruning residues, and it has never been analyzed in literature. The results obtained showed consistent work productivity, which resulted the highest ever found in olive pruning harvesting systems and equal to 5.23 ± 0.81 tdm·h−1. This high work productivity allowed also to obtain a little economic gain from a matter, which is actually considered a problem for olive groves’ owners and not a potential source of income. In particular, the use of a stationary chipper seemed very efficient in olive groves with a consistent amount of wooden residues to be processed and with big branches not harvestable by the most common towed pruning harvester. In addition, the stationary chipper has the advantage of avoiding the preliminary raking operation, which results in reduced costs for the farmer.