Daniel Ierodiaconou

Dr. Daniel Ierodiaconou

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2010 in Landscape and Urban Planning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ELEva Leslie
Eva Leslie
TSTakemi Sugiyama
Takemi Sugiyama
DIDaniel Ierodiaconou
Daniel Ierodiaconou
PKPeter Kremer
Peter Kremer

19 August 2020 in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TLTim Langlois
Tim Langlois
JGJordan Goetze
Jordan Goetze
TBTodd Bond
Todd Bond
JMJacquomo Monk
Jacquomo Monk
RARene A. Abesamis
Rene A. Abesamis
EHEuan S. Harvey
Euan S. Harvey
Baited remote underwater stereo‐video systems (stereo‐BRUVs) are a popular tool to sample demersal fish assemblages and gather data on their relative abundance and body size structure in a robust, cost‐effective and non‐invasive manner. Given the rapid uptake of the method, subtle differences have emerged in the way stereo‐BRUVs are deployed and how the resulting imagery is annotated. These disparities limit the interoperability of datasets obtained across studies, preventing broadscale insights into the dynamics of ecological systems. We provide the first globally accepted guide for using stereo‐BRUVs to survey demersal fish assemblages and associated benthic habitats. Information on stereo‐BRUVs design, camera settings, field operations and image annotation are outlined. Additionally, we provide links to protocols for data validation, archiving and sharing. Globally, the use of stereo‐BRUVs is spreading rapidly. We provide a standardized protocol that will reduce methodological variation among researchers and encourage the use of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable workflows to increase the ability to synthesize global datasets and answer a broad suite of ecological questions.

26 April 2014 in Marine Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KPKellie Pendoley
Kellie Pendoley
GSGail Schofield
Gail Schofield
PWPaul A. Whittock
Paul A. Whittock
DIDaniel Ierodiaconou
Daniel Ierodiaconou
GHGraeme C. Hays
Graeme C. Hays

1 February 2011 in Continental Shelf Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DIDaniel Ierodiaconou
Daniel Ierodiaconou
JMJ. Monk
J. Monk
ARA. Rattray
A. Rattray
LLL. Laurenson
L. Laurenson
VVVincent Versace
Vincent Versace

25 September 2020 in Drones
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VRVincent Raoult
Vincent Raoult
ACAndrew Peter Colefax
Andrew Peter Colefax
BABlake Allan
Blake Allan
DCDaniele Cagnazzi
Daniele Cagnazzi
NCNataly Castelblanco-Martínez
Nataly Castelblanco-Martínez
PBPaul Butcher
Paul Butcher
The use of drones to study marine animals shows promise for the examination of numerous aspects of their ecology, behaviour, health and movement patterns. However, the responses of some marine phyla to the presence of drones varies broadly, as do the general operational protocols used to study them. Inconsistent methodological approaches could lead to difficulties comparing studies and can call into question the repeatability of research. This review draws on current literature and researchers with a wealth of practical experience to outline the idiosyncrasies of studying various marine taxa with drones. We also outline current best practice for drone operation in marine environments based on the literature and our practical experience in the field. The protocols outlined herein will be of use to researchers interested in incorporating drones as a tool into their research on marine animals and will help form consistent approaches for drone-based studies in the future.

31 August 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSarah Murfitt
Sarah Murfitt
BABlake M. Allan
Blake M. Allan
ABAlecia Bellgrove
Alecia Bellgrove
ARAlex Rattray
Alex Rattray
MYMary A. Young
Mary A. Young
DIDaniel Ierodiaconou
Daniel Ierodiaconou
Monitoring of intertidal reefs is traditionally undertaken by on-ground survey methods which have assisted in understanding these complex habitats; however, often only a small spatial footprint of the reef is observed. Recent developments in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) provide new opportunities for monitoring broad scale coastal ecosystems through the ability to capture centimetre resolution imagery and topographic data not possible with conventional approaches. This study compares UAV remote sensing of intertidal reefs to traditional on-ground monitoring surveys, and investigates the role of UAV derived geomorphological variables in explaining observed intertidal algal and invertebrate assemblages. A multirotor UAV was used to capture <1 cm resolution data from intertidal reefs, with on-ground quadrat surveys of intertidal biotic data for comparison. UAV surveys provided reliable estimates of dominant canopy-forming algae, however, understorey species were obscured and often underestimated. UAV derived geomorphic variables showed elevation and distance to seaward reef edge explained 19.7% and 15.9% of the variation in algal and invertebrate assemblage structure respectively. The findings of this study demonstrate benefits of low-cost UAVs for intertidal monitoring through rapid data collection, full coverage census, identification of dominant canopy habitat and generation of geomorphic derivatives for explaining biological variation.