Ocarcinoma patients (33 low rectum T2, 74 T3, 29 T4 [without sacral invasion], 25 with mucinous subtype) were treated with posterior pelvis preoperative radiotherapy (5040 cGy total dose, 180 cGy/fr, 5 fr/w, 10-15 MV linac X-rays) and concomitant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. After 6 to 8 weeks patients underwent surgery and prechemoradiation clinical stage was compared with pathologic stage to evaluate downstaging in each patient. Seventy-four patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 39 months (4-84). Results: Forty-four patients had macroscopic complete response, 52 patients had partial response, 37 patients showed no change and 3 patients had progression. At multivariate analysis only histotype showed correlation with downstaging (hazard ratio = 0.350 and 0.138 - 0.885 95 percent confidence interval) because of the evidence for poor downstaging in mucinous subtype. There were no significant differences in overall survival and progression-free survival between adenocarcinoma and mucinous subtype. Conclusions: The main finding is that mucinous histology is associated with poor downstaging after preoperative chemoradiation but this poor response was not associated with worse outcome in this small study. The good outcome for mucinous histology is at odds with other reports in the literature and requires further study. a Phone: +39-010-563-4831; Fax: +39-010-563-4843; e-mail: filippo.grillo.ruggieri@galliera.it © The ASCRS 2007...

Purpose. We compared the accuracy of¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI with that of multiparametric MRI (mMRI),¹⁸F-Choline-PET/CT,¹⁸F-Fluoride-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT (CeCT) in detecting relapse in patients with suspected relapse of prostate cancer (PC) after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). We assessed the association between standard uptake value (SUV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).Methods. We evaluated 21 patients with biochemical relapse after EBRT. Patients underwent¹⁸F-Choline-PET/contrast-enhanced (Ce)CT,¹⁸F-Fluoride-PET/CT, and mMRI. Imaging coregistration of PET and mMRI was performed.Results.¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI was positive in 18/21 patients, with a detection rate (DR) of 86%. DRs of¹⁸F-Choline-PET/CT, CeCT, and mMRI were 76%, 43%, and 81%, respectively. In terms of DR the only significant difference was between¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI and CeCT. On lesion-based analysis, the accuracy of¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI,¹⁸F-Choline-PET/CT, CeCT, and mMRI was 99%, 95%, 70%, and 85%, respectively. Accuracy, sensitivity, and NPV of¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI were significantly higher than those of both mMRI and CeCT. On whole-body assessment of bone metastases, the sensitivity of¹⁸F-Choline-PET/CT and¹⁸F-Fluoride-PET/CT was significantly higher than that of CeCT. Regarding local and lymph node relapse, we found a significant inverse correlation between ADC and SUV-max.Conclusion.¹⁸F-Choline-PET/MRI is a promising technique in detecting PC relapse.

Colorectal cancer patients’ responses to neoadjuvant therapy undergo broad inter-individual variations. The aim of this systematic review is to identify a molecular signature that is predictive of colon cancer downstaging and/or downgrading after neoadjuvant therapy. Among the hundreds analysed in the available studies, only 19 messenger-RNAs (mRNAs) and six micro-RNAs (miRNAs) were differentially expressed in responders versus non-responders in two or more independent studies. Therefore, a mRNA/miRNA signature can be designed accordingly, with limitations caused by the retrospective nature of these studies, the heterogeneity in study designs and the downgrading/downstaging assessment criteria. This signature can be proposed to tailor neoadjuvant therapy regimens on an individual basis.

Fluconazole is recommended in the prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head-neck tumours; however, the actual effectiveness of fluconazole in this setting remains unclear. Adult patients with cervico-cephalic carcinoma submitted to radical or adjuvant radiotherapy were randomized to 100 mg fluconazole (n = 138) or matched placebo (n = 132) oral suspension once daily from the sixth session of radiotherapy up to the end of treatment. The final analysis of the investigation showed a higher rate of the OPC outbreak-free survival in the fluconazole compared with placebo (P = 0.008 in the log-rank test). The mean time (95% CI) to OPC outbreak was 56 (53-59) days in the fluconazole group and 47 (43-51) days with placebo. The mean duration of radiotherapy was 43.5 and 39.9 days, respectively in the two groups (P = 0.027). Adverse effects were reported in 70.3% of patients in the fluconazole group and in 67.4% with placebo. The results showed prophylaxis with fluconazole given in irradiated patients with head-neck tumours significantly reduces the rate and the time to development of OPC compared with placebo.

Background: Proton therapy is indicated for cancers that would be difficult to treat with conventional radiotherapy. Compulsory healthcare insurance covers the costs of this therapy in Switzerland, but this does not mean that proton therapy is cost-neutral for every cancer patient. Significant out-of-pocket (OOP) costs may arise due to expenses associated with proton therapy, and patients may experience treatment-related financial distress—an effect known as “financial toxicity.” This study investigates the financial toxicity of patients undergoing proton therapy in a high-income country with a compulsory health insurance policy. Methods: Between September 2019 and November 2021, 146 Swiss cancer patients treated with proton therapy participated in this study, of whom 90 (62%) were adults and 56 (38%) were caregivers of child cancer patients. Financial toxicity was assessed using the FACIT Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST). OOP costs during proton therapy were recorded weekly, and financial coping strategies were captured at the end of treatment. Findings: The median COST score, indicating financial toxicity, was 29.9 (IQR 21.0; 36.0) for all patients, 30.0 (IQR 21.3; 37.9) for adults, and 28.0 (IQR 20.5; 34.0) for children’s caregivers. Higher income (estimate 8.1, 95% CI 3.7 to 12.4, p ≤ 0.001) was significantly associated with higher COST scores, indicating less financial toxicity. Further distance from home to the treatment centre per 100 km (estimate −3.7, 95% CI −5.7 to −1.9, p ≤ 0.001) was significantly associated with lower COST scores, indicating increased financial toxicity. Married adult patients had substantially lower COST scores than single patients (estimate: −9.1, 95% CI −14.8 to −3.4, p ≤ 0.001). The median OOP cost was 2050 Swiss francs (CHF) and was spent mainly on travel, accommodation, and eating out. Sixty-three (43%) patients used their savings; 54 (37%) cut spending on leisure activities; 21 (14.4%) cut living expenses; 14 (9.6%) borrowed money; nine (6.2%) worked more; and four (2.7%) sold property. Patients with high COST scores used significantly fewer coping strategies such as saving on leisure activities (estimate −9.5, 95% CI −12.4 to −6.6, p ≤ 0.001), spending savings (estimate −3.9, 95% CI −6.3 to −1.4, p = 0.002), borrowing money (estimate −6.3, 95% CI −10.4 to −2.2, p = 0.003), and increasing workload (estimate −5.5, 95% CI −10.5 to −0.4, p = 0.035). Interpretation: A substantial number of cancer patients treated with proton therapy experience financial toxicity in Switzerland. Long travel distances to the proton therapy centre and low income negatively affect the financial well-being of these patients during proton therapy.

The scenario of systemic therapy for prostate cancer is rapidly evolving, with new drugs and new treatment options. To update the background knowledge of shared uro-oncologic practice, we reviewed current statements and landmarks in systemic therapy. A number of new agents are under investigation in non-metastatic and metastatic disease. Similarly, new target imaging technologies are under development to improve the detection rate of true non-metastatic and true metastatic patient. Five new drugs have shown to be effective on progression-free and overall survival in metastatìc prostate cancer. However, the optimal sequencing of these treatments requires further investigations. The tolerability and side effects of the new drugs are also crucial issues to be discussed, as well as their activity against the disease. The uro-oncologic team has to stay updated about new medical therapies in order to be confident in debating with other professionals involved in prostate cancer decision making. Different points of view and nuances should be shared during multidisciplinary group discussions to achieve a balanced decision in the disease management.