Sergio Croquer

Mr. Sergio Croquer


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 February 2022 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
OLOlivier Lamberts
Olivier Lamberts
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet
Stéphane MoreauStéphane Moreau
Stéphane Moreau
YBYann Bartosiewicz
Yann Bartosiewicz

1 July 2021 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
YFYu Fang
Yu Fang
AMAntoine Metsue
Antoine Metsue
YBYann Bartosiewicz
Yann Bartosiewicz
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPilar Díaz-Carrasco
Pilar Díaz-Carrasco
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
VTVahid Tamimi
Vahid Tamimi
JLJay Lacey
Jay Lacey
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet
This review paper presents the recent advances in the numerical modelling of wave–structure–seabed interactions. The processes that are involved in wave–structure interactions, which leads to sediment transport and scour effects, are summarized. Subsequently, the three most common approaches for modelling sediment transport that is induced by wave–structure interactions are described. The applicability of each numerical approach is also included with a summary of the most recent studies. These approaches are based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations for the fluid phase, and mostly differ in how they tackle the seabed response. Finally, future prospects of research are discussed.

9 August 2022 in International Journal of Refrigeration
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCharles P. Rand
Charles P. Rand
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
MPMichel Poirier
Michel Poirier
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet

22 January 2022 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JJJihyuk Jeong
Jihyuk Jeong
AHAlla Eddine Benchikh Le Hocine
Alla Eddine Benchikh Le Hocine
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet
BMBenoit Michel
Benoit Michel
JBJocelyn Bonjour
Jocelyn Bonjour

30 October 2017 in Entropy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SCSergio Croquer
Sergio Croquer
Sébastien PoncetSébastien Poncet
Sébastien Poncet
ZAZine Aidoun
Zine Aidoun
This study presents a thermodynamic model for determining the entrainment ratio and double choke limiting pressure of supersonic ejectors within the context of heat driven refrigeration cycles, with and without droplet injection, at the constant area section of the device. Input data include the inlet operating conditions and key geometry parameters (primary throat, mixing section and diffuser outlet diameter), whereas output information includes the ejector entrainment ratio, maximum double choke compression ratio, ejector efficiency, exergy efficiency and exergy destruction index. In single-phase operation, the ejector entrainment ratio and double choke limiting pressure are determined with a mean accuracy of 18 % and 2.5 % , respectively. In two-phase operation, the choked mass flow rate across convergent-divergent nozzles is estimated with a deviation of 10 % . An analysis on the effect of droplet injection confirms the hypothesis that droplet injection reduces by 8 % the pressure and Mach number jumps associated with shock waves occuring at the end of the constant area section. Nonetheless, other factors such as the mixing of the droplets with the main flow are introduced, resulting in an overall reduction by 11 % of the ejector efficiency and by 15 % of the exergy efficiency.