Ian Doulgas Evans

Dr. Ian Doulgas Evans

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

10Years (2017-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2025 in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CWChristopher B Watson
Christopher B Watson
CSChristopher F. Sharpley
Christopher F. Sharpley
VBVicki Bitsika
Vicki Bitsika
IEIan Doulgas Evans
Ian Doulgas Evans
KVKirstan Vessey
Kirstan Vessey
Introduction: Childhood maltreatment (CM) and depression are serious global issues with high prevalence and lifelong impacts on physical and mental health. CM has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor for depression that, if prevented, may contribute to a reduction in the global incidence of depressive disorders. Despite this, there is a paucity of reviews examining the strength of the association between these variables. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate the empirical evidence and determine if CM is supported as a preventable risk factor for depression.Methods: A search was performed in July 2024 for all peer‐reviewed journal articles written in English examining the relationship between CM and adult depression in the electronic databases EBSCOhost, Proquest, and Embase. Studies were included in this review if they measured maltreatment before 18 years of age as the independent variable and adult depression as the dependent variable. Studies were excluded if the outcome variable was grouped with comorbidity and if they did not report primary quantitative data. A total of 77 studies with 516,302 participants met the inclusion criteria for review.Results: A random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to generate a pooled odds ratio from 87 effect estimates and demonstrated that individuals with a history of any CM are 2.5 times more likely to experience adult depression (OR = 2.49 [95% CI: 2.25–2.76]). This increase in odds remained regardless of how the primary studies screened for depression.Conclusions: These findings confirmed the strong association between the experience of CM and adult depression. High heterogeneity in the meta‐analytic results also suggested that further research is required that applies consistent adjustments for comorbidities and confounding factors and examines the temporal relationship between the variables to establish causality.


13 January 2021 in Bioelectromagnetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IEIan Doulgas Evans
Ian Doulgas Evans
SPStephen Palmisano
Stephen Palmisano
RCRodney J. Croft
Rodney J. Croft

2 September 2023 in Symmetry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSChristopher F. Sharpley
Christopher F. Sharpley
WAWayne M. Arnold
Wayne M. Arnold
IEIan Doulgas Evans
Ian Doulgas Evans
VBVicki Bitsika
Vicki Bitsika
EJEmmanuel Jesulola
Emmanuel Jesulola
LALinda L. Agnew
Linda L. Agnew
A brief review of 50 studies from the last 10 years indicated that it is often accepted practice to apply log transformation processes to raw EEG data. This practice is based upon the assumptions that (a) EEG data do not resemble a normal distribution, (b) applying a transformation will produce an acceptably normal distribution, (c) the logarithmic transformation is the most valid form of transformation for these data, and (d) the statistical procedures intended to be used are not robust to non-normality. To test those assumptions, EEG data from 100 community participants were analysed for their normality by reference to their skewness and kurtosis, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk statistics, and shapes of histograms. Where non-normality was observed, several transformations were applied, and the data again tested for normality to identify the most appropriate method. To test the effects of normalisation from all these processes, Pearson and Spearman correlations between the raw and normalised EEG alpha asymmetry data and depression were calculated to detect any variation in the significance of the resultant statistic.

18 August 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBVicki Bitsika
Vicki Bitsika
CSChristopher F. Sharpley
Christopher F. Sharpley
IEIan Doulgas Evans
Ian Doulgas Evans
KVKirstan Vessey
Kirstan Vessey
Background/Objectives: Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) relies on the observation of difficulties in social communication and interaction, plus the presence of repetitive and restrictive behaviors. The identification of neurological correlates of these symptoms remains a high priority for clinical research, and has the potential to increase the validity of diagnosis of ASD as well as provide greater understanding of how the autistic brain functions. This study focused on two neurological phenomena that have been previously associated with psychiatric disorders (alpha- and theta-wave asymmetry across the frontal region of the brain), and tested for their association with the major diagnostic criteria for ASD. Methods: A total of 41 male autistic youth underwent assessment with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS-2) and 3 min of eyes-closed resting EEG to collect alpha- and theta-wave data from right and left frontal brain sites. Results: Different associations were found for theta versus alpha asymmetry and the ADOS-2 subscales, across different brain regions responsible for a varying range of cognitive functions. In general, theta asymmetry was associated with conversation with others, sharing of enjoyment, and making social overtures, whereas alpha asymmetry was linked with making eye contact, reporting events to others, and engaging in reciprocal social communication. Specific brain regions involved are identified, as well as implications for clinical practice. Conclusions: Specific autism symptoms may be associated with selected brain region activity, providing a neurological basis for diagnosis and treatment.

19 May 2025 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JMJen E. McKeough
Jen E. McKeough
CSChristopher F. Sharpley
Christopher F. Sharpley
KVKirstan Vessey
Kirstan Vessey
VBVicki Bitsika
Vicki Bitsika
RWRebecca Williams
Rebecca Williams
IEIan Doulgas Evans
Ian Doulgas Evans
Background/Objectives: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a neuropsychiatric disorder affecting nearly 200 million people worldwide. While it has broad health effects, relatively little is known about how these vary across MDD ‘subtypes’, which reflect distinct symptom profiles. This systematic review examined the methods used to define several MDD subtypes and their associations with physical, cognitive, social, and functional health outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English between 2014 and 2025. The final search was conducted on 21 January 2025. Studies were included if they examined adults with MDD subtypes and reported health-related outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to heterogeneity in the subtype definitions and outcome measures. Results: Sixteen studies were included. Atypical and melancholic depression were most consistently associated with metabolic dysfunction, higher BMI, and a greater waist circumference. Melancholic depression was frequently associated with cognitive deficits, though results varied. Cognitive impairments were also observed in DSM-defined atypical depression, particularly in attention, vigilance, and social cognition. Anxious and melancholic depression may be associated with more severe social and functional impairment compared to other subtypes. However, the findings were limited by inconsistent definitions and outcome measures. Conclusions: Some subtypes, particularly atypical, melancholic, and anxious depression, are differentially associated with specific patterns of impairment, though inconsistencies limit firm conclusions. Registration: This review was retrospectively registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF): No specific funding was received.