Implant extrusion in subtalar arthroereisis is a common complication for pediatric flexible flatfoot. However, there were a limited number of articles addressing the body weight effects on implant extrusion after the procedure. We conducted a 24-month follow-up assessment after subtalar arthroereisis. Surgical patients who underwent the Vulpius procedure were retrospectively collected from May 2010 to January 2017, including 59 cases of both feet having implants in situ and 43 cases of both feet having implant extrusion. The average age of 102 patients was 9 years old. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the implant in situ group was 19.5, whilst the extrusion group was 21.2 (p = 0.035). The inter-observer correlation was excellent. There were 11 cases (39.3%) of bilateral extrusion in the overweight group (BMI ≥ 24) and 13 cases (23.2%) in the low body weight group (BMI ≤ 18.5) (p < 0.0004). Postoperative radiographic angles were corrected in both the implant in situ group and the extrusion group. Nonetheless, the implant in situ group revealed better postoperative outcomes of Meary’s angle and the talonavicular angle from an anterior-posterior view, and the talar inclination angle from a lateral view. We conclude that a higher BMI is related to implant extrusion and worse results after subtalar arthroereisis. Further prospective study to investigate whether preoperative weight loss results in improved surgical outcomes is warranted in the future.

Objective: To investigate the incidence and risk factors of bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) in bone tumor surgeries.Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. We investigated patients who underwent bone tumor surgeries requiring cementation as part of the surgery between March 2016 and January 2018. We reviewed medical records, including formal anesthesia records and operation notes. Patients with complete data files were included. To investigate the general incidence of BCIS in tumor surgeries, patients of all ages, genders and tumor types were included. Vital signs, including oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate, were checked and recorded once every 1–2 min after cementation. Accurate time points of cementation were recorded on formal anesthesia record sheets by the anesthesiologists. The definition and severity of BCIS were based on the classification system proposed in previous studies: grade I, moderate hypoxia (SpO₂ 20%); grade II, severe hypoxia (SpO₂ 40%) or unexpected loss of consciousness; and grade III, cardiovascular collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We also compared the incidence of BCIS between those patients with and without possible risk factors, including intraoperative blood loss, arthroplasty, use of an intramedullary device, patient age, gender, tumor location, and preexisting lung cancer or lung metastasis.Results: A total of 88 patients were included. BCIS occurred in 23 patients, with an incidence of 26.1%. Among them, 19 had grade I and 4 had grade II BCIS. There was no patients with grade III BCIS. The lowest blood pressure occurred within 10 min in 21 (87.5%) patients and within 20 min for all patients. A total of 9 grade I BCIS were self‐limiting. The other 10 grade I hypotension cases and all grade II hypotension cases recovered after administration of a vasoconstrictor medication. Preexisting lung cancer or lung metastasis was the risk factor for BCIS; 40.0% of patients (16 in 40 patients) with preexisting lung cancer or metastasis had BCIS, whereas only 14.6% of patients (7 in 48 patients) without lung lesions had BCIS. There was no risk difference in terms of arthroplasty, old age, and increased blood loss. Apart from grades I and II bone cement implantation syndrome, there were no other major complications, including death, cardiovascular events, or cerebrovascular events.Conclusion: Bone cement implantation syndrome is not unusual in bone tumor surgeries, and preexisting lung cancer or lung metastasis is a risk factor.

Background: The distal radius fracture is a common orthopedic injury. We aimed to share the surgical steps and investigate the outcomes of treating distal radius fractures with wounds ≤10 mm using a globally accessible locking plate. Methods: We collected 46 patients who underwent surgery via a <10 mm wound, with a control group consisting of 40 patients who underwent conventional procedures. Both groups were treated using the same volar plate. We compared the radiographic reduction quality, including volar tilt angle, radial inclination angle, and ulna variance. Additionally, clinical outcomes, such as pain assessed using VAS, Q-Dash score, and PRWE, were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the wound was also analyzed. The follow-up time for the clinical outcomes was 24.2 ± 13.47 months. Results: There were no differences in the quality of reduction in parameters such as the volar tilt angle (p = 0.762), radial inclination angle (p = 0.986), and ulna variance (p = 0.166). Both groups exhibited comparable results in pain VAS (p = 0.684), Q-Dash score (p = 0.08), and PRWE (p = 0.134). The ≤10 mm incision group displayed an increase in satisfaction with the wound (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treating distal radius fractures with a <10 mm wound using a non-specialized locking plate is a feasible approach. It does not compromise the quality of fracture reduction or functional scores and improves wound satisfaction.