Rice, a crucial staple in China, is cultivated through various techniques, including seedling transplanting, dry direct seeding, and film mulching. Despite its significance, rice production is a considerable environmental burden. Using a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, this study aimed to evaluate the environmental impacts of four rice cultivation methods (transplanting rice, dry direct-seeding rice, dry direct-seeding rice with polyethylene film (PE), and dry direct-seeding rice with biodegradable film) in Northeast China. The results indicate that the magnitude of environmental impacts among treatments was consistent across years. The potential values of all environmental impacts of the four different cultivation methods of rice in the 2021 field trial were smaller than the results of the same cultivation method of rice system in the 2022 field trial. Among the four rice cultivation methods, the consumption of energy showed inconsistency over the two years, with the highest energy consumption in the first year being for dry seeding with PE film and in the second year for dry seeding without film. Additionally, transplanting exhibited the highest impact on water resource consumption and climate change. Dry direct-seeding rice displayed the highest eutrophication and ecotoxicity. Dry direct-seeding rice with a biodegradable film had the least impact in terms of acidification. Moreover, dry direct-seeding rice with a biodegradable film minimized water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions without compromising yield.

In the realm of agriculture, biodegradable films are emerging as a promising substitute for traditional polyethylene (PE) films. Despite their potential, there has been a notable lack of extensive research on their effectiveness in the context of dry direct-seeded rice cultivation. Addressing this gap, a comprehensive biennial study was conducted in the northeastern regions of China, focusing on the ‘Baonong 5’ rice variety. This study meticulously compared three distinct cultivation methods: (1) employing biodegradable film mulching, (2) using conventional plastic film mulching, and (3) cultivating without any mulch. The findings revealed that biodegradable film mulching significantly enhanced soil moisture control, increased leaf area, and improved rice yield and water utilization efficiency (p < 0.05) compared to the plots without mulch. Notably, there was no marked difference in outcomes between the plastic film mulching and the unmulched plots. This research underscores the profound benefits of biodegradable film in rice cultivation, particularly from an environmental sustainability perspective. This innovative method not only boosts agricultural productivity but also addresses critical environmental challenges like climate change and water conservation. The application of biodegradable mulch has proven to be remarkably effective in improving irrigation efficiency and crop water conservation, leading to enhanced rice development and higher yields. The study recorded a substantial increase in water productivity—30% in 2021 and between 52.85% and 60% in 2022—compared to traditional cultivation practices. Furthermore, the use of biodegradable mulch resulted in significantly higher rice yields than the non-mulched plots, thus contributing to increased profitability. Such methods not only yield higher crop outputs but also mitigate environmental issues like water pollution and help alleviate prevalent water shortages in rice farming.

Soil pollution caused by plastic residues containing additives (e.g. phthalic acid esters (PAEs)) is ubiquitous and has become a global concern. However, the distribution, accumulation, and potential risks associated with PAEs in agricultural soils have not been fully explored. This study quantified the types, concentrations, and distribution patterns of common PAEs in 29 agricultural soil samples collected from the Xinjiang Oasis, China. The results indicated that no significant variation in PAE concentrations across the oasis farmlands in Xinjiang. The PAEs were predominantly concentrated in the topsoil layer (0-20 cm), with an average concentration of 102.3 μg/kg, with some migration observed to the deeper soil layer (20-40 cm). The most abundant PAEs detected were Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP), which accounted for 49.82 %, 23.74 %, and 20.96 % of the total, respectively. Furthermore, the concentrations of all PAEs were below China's soil quality risk control standards, and the non-carcinogenic risks to both adults and children were below the current threshold, indicating relatively low risks to both the human health and the environment. These findings are crucial for understanding the presence and safety evaluation of PAEs in Xinjiang Oasis farmland, and they provide important reference data for managing and controlling PAE contamination in agricultural soils.

Biodegradable film (BM) presents a promising replacement for plastic film (PM). However, the ability of BM to substitute PM across different crops and regions remains unclear. This study compared the effects of BM and PM on cotton, maize, potato, and wheat by conducting a meta-analysis of yield responses and employing a random forest model to identify key drivers under film mulching. Furthermore, an XGBoost model was applied to simulate spatial yield changes under current and future climate conditions across China’s agro-regions. The meta-analysis indicated that the overall yield enhancement under PM (30.0%) was significantly higher than under BM (26.5%), with a relatively small difference between the two films. The Northern Arid and Semi-Arid Region showed a significant difference, with yield increases of 37.8% under PM and 28.5% under BM. BM resulted in an 18.7% increase in economic return, whereas PM led to a 32% increase. Both BM and PM enhanced the yield of all four crops, but PM had a greater effect on maize (31.8% vs. 28.0%). Random forest identified mean annual temperature (MAT), precipitation (MAP) and nitrogen application rate (N) as the main drivers influencing yield responses under film mulching. Under conditions of MAT < 10 °C, MAP < 450 mm and N ≥ 200 kg ha⁻¹, PM outperformed BM. However, the yield benefits associated with BM will strengthen over time under future climate scenarios. Future scenarios simulations suggested that BM’s relative advantage may increase, particularly for maize, across certain regions. These findings offer region-specific mulching strategies that promote a sustainable agricultural environment.