Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are systemic and multifaceted disorders which affect other organs in addition to the gastrointestinal tract in up to 50% of cases. Extraintestinal manifestations may present before or after IBD diagnosis and negatively impact the intestinal disease course and patients’ quality of life, often requiring additional diagnostic evaluations or specific treatments. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. Current evidence shows an increased prevalence of NAFLD (and its more advanced stages, such as liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis) in IBD patients compared to the general population. Many different IBD-specific etiopathogenetic mechanisms have been hypothesized, including chronic inflammation, malabsorption, previous surgical interventions, changes in fecal microbiota, and drugs. However, the pathophysiological link between these two diseases is still poorly understood. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential mechanisms which have been investigated so far and highlight open issues still to be addressed for future studies.

Acute pancreatitis is a complex inflammatory disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in its management, the role of antibiotics in the prophylaxis and treatment of acute pancreatitis remains controversial. The aim of this comprehensive review is to analyze current evidence on the use of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis, focusing on prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. Prophylactic use aims to prevent local and systemic infections. However, recent studies have questioned the routine use of antibiotics for prophylaxis and highlighted the potential risks of antibiotic resistance and adverse effects. In selected high-risk cases, such as infected necrotizing pancreatitis, prophylactic antibiotic therapy may still be beneficial. As for therapeutic use, antibiotics are usually used to treat infected pancreatic necrosis and extrapancreatic infections. When selecting an antibiotic, the microbiologic profile and local resistance patterns should be considered. Combination therapy with broad-spectrum antibiotics is often recommended to cover both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. Recent research has highlighted the importance of individualized approaches to antibiotic use in acute pancreatitis and underscored the need for a tailored approach based on patient-specific factors. This review also highlights the potential role of new antimicrobial agents and alternative strategies, such as probiotics, in the management of acute pancreatitis.

Gut microbiota (GM) modulation can be investigated as possible solution to enhance recovery after COVID-19. An open-label, single-center, single-arm, pilot, interventional study was performed by enrolling twenty patients recently recovered from COVID-19 to investigate the role of a mixed probiotic, containing Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria and Streptococcus thermophilus, on gastrointestinal symptoms, local and systemic inflammation, intestinal barrier integrity and GM profile. Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, cytokines, inflammatory, gut permeability, and integrity markers were evaluated before (T₀) and after 8 weeks (T₁) of probiotic supplementation. GM profiling was based on 16S-rRNA targeted-metagenomics and QIIME 2.0, LEfSe and PICRUSt computational algorithms. Multiple machine learning (ML) models were trained to classify GM at T₀ and T₁. A statistically significant reduction of IL-6 (p < 0.001), TNF-α (p < 0.001) and IL-12RA (p < 0.02), citrulline (p value < 0.001) was reported at T₁. GM global distribution and microbial biomarkers strictly reflected probiotic composition, with a general increase in Bifidobacteria at T₁. Twelve unique KEGG orthologs were associated only to T₀, including tetracycline resistance cassettes. ML classified the GM at T₁ with 100% score at phylum level. Bifidobacteriaceae and Bifidobacterium spp. inversely correlated to reduction of citrulline and inflammatory cytokines. Probiotic supplementation during post-COVID-19 may trigger anti-inflammatory effects though Bifidobacteria and related-metabolism enhancement.

Background and Aims: Subcutaneous vedolizumab formulation has been shown to be as effective and safe as the intravenous one in randomized control trials. Real-life data are limited especially for patients receiving long-term intravenous therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in a large cohort of patients with stable clinical remission. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled consecutive patients attending our center between September 2021 and April 2022. The baseline demographic characteristics, 12- and 24-weeks follow-up clinical activity, C-reactive protein levels, and adverse events were recorded. The primary endpoint was to assess combined steroid-free clinical remission plus biochemical remission 24-week after the switch. Results: 93 patients (43 Crohn’s disease, 50 ulcerative colitis), switched to subcutaneous vedolizumab after a median duration of intravenous treatment of 36 months [IQR 16-52]. At baseline, 80 patients (86%) had a combined remission. At 24-week, 89.2% (n=74) maintained combined steroid-free clinical remission plus biochemical remission. 25 adverse events were reported, mostly SARS-CoV-2 infections and injection site reactions, with a further four recurrence episodes. Twelve patients (12.9%) discontinued subcutaneous administration and restarted intravenous vedolizumab. Conclusions: Switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab can be considered effective and safe for maintaining remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. In addition, this might reduce healthcare costs. However, large-scale real-life studies with long-term follow-up are necessary.

CMV infection is still a matter of concern in IBD patients, especially regarding the disease’s relapse management. Why IBD patients, particularly those affected by ulcerative colitis, are more susceptible to CMV reactivation is not totally explained, although a weakened immune system could be the reason. Various techniques, ranging from serology to histology, can be employed to detect intestinal CMV infection; however, there is currently disagreement in the literature regarding the most effective diagnostic test. Furthermore, CMV involvement in steroid resistance has been broadly discussed, but whether CMV infection is a cause or consequence of the disease severity and, consequently, steroid refractoriness is still debated. Its potential contribution to the lack of response to advanced therapy and small molecules must be more valued and wholly explored. In this review, we look at the actual literature on CMV in IBD patients, and we suggest a pragmatic algorithm for clinical practice management of CMV infection.

Ascites, a common complication of portal hypertension in cirrhosis, is characterized by the accumulation of fluid within the peritoneal cavity. While traditional theories focus on hemodynamic alterations and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation, recent research highlights the intricate interplay of molecular and cellular mechanisms. Inflammation, mediated by cytokines (interleukin-1, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α), chemokines (chemokine ligand 21, C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12), and reactive oxygen species (ROS), plays a pivotal role. Besides pro-inflammatory cytokines, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs), and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) contribute to the process through their activation and altered functions. Once activated, these cell types can worsen ascites accumulationthrough extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition and paracrine signals. Besides this, macrophages, both resident and infiltrating, through their plasticity, participate in this complex crosstalk by promoting inflammation and dysregulating lymphatic system reabsorption. Indeed, the lymphatic system and lymphangiogenesis, essential for fluid reabsorption, is dysregulated in cirrhosis, exacerbating ascites. The gut microbiota and intestinal barrier alterations which occur in cirrhosis and portal hypertension also play a role by inducing inflammation, creating a vicious circle which worsens portal hypertension and fluid accumulation. This review aims to gather these aspects of ascites pathophysiology which are usually less considered and to date have not been addressed using specific therapy. Nonetheless, it emphasizes the need for further research to understand the complex interactions among these mechanisms, ultimately leading to targeted interventions in specific molecular pathways, aiming towards the development of new therapeutic strategies.