Fusobacterium nucleatum, a gram-negative anaerobic bacterium, has emerged as a significant player in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. The bacterium causes a persistent inflammatory reaction in the colorectal mucosa by stimulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, creating an environment conducive to cancer progression. F. nucleatum binds to and penetrates epithelial cells through adhesins such as FadA, impairing cell junctions and encouraging epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is associated with cancer advancement. Additionally, the bacterium modulates the host immune system, suppressing immune cell activity and creating conditions favorable for tumor growth. Its interactions with the gut microbiome contribute to dysbiosis, further influencing carcinogenic pathways. Evidence indicates that F. nucleatum can inflict DNA damage either directly via reactive oxygen species or indirectly by creating a pro-inflammatory environment. Additionally, it triggers oncogenic pathways, especially the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which promotes tumor cell growth and longevity. Moreover, F. nucleatum alters the tumor microenvironment, impacting cancer cell behavior, metastasis, and therapeutic responses. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which F. nucleatum contributes to CRC. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for the development of targeted therapies and diagnostic strategies for CRC associated with F. nucleatum.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent chronic liver condition marked by excessive lipid accumulation in hepatic tissue. This disorder can lead to a range of pathological outcomes, including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and cirrhosis. Despite extensive research, the molecular mechanisms driving MASLD initiation and progression remain incompletely understood. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation are pivotal in the “multiple parallel hit model”, contributing to hepatic cell death and tissue damage. Gut microbiota plays a substantial role in modulating hepatic oxidative stress through multiple pathways: impairing the intestinal barrier, which results in bacterial translocation and chronic hepatic inflammation; modifying bile acid structure, which impacts signaling cascades involved in lipidic metabolism; influencing hepatocytes’ ferroptosis, a form of programmed cell death; regulating trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) metabolism; and activating platelet function, both recently identified as pathogenetic factors in MASH progression. Moreover, various exogenous factors impact gut microbiota and its involvement in MASLD-related oxidative stress, such as air pollution, physical activity, cigarette smoke, alcohol, and dietary patterns. This manuscript aims to provide a state-of-the-art overview focused on the intricate interplay between gut microbiota, lipid peroxidation, and MASLD pathogenesis, offering insights into potential strategies to prevent disease progression and its associated complications.

Oxidative stress has been described as one of the main drivers of intracellular damage and metabolic disorders leading to metabolic syndrome, a major health problem worldwide. In particular, free radicals alter lipid metabolism and promote lipid accumulation in the liver, existing in the hepatic facet of metabolic syndrome, the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Recent literature has highlighted how nicotine, especially if associated with a high-fat diet, exerts a negative effect on the induction and progression of MASLD by upregulating inflammation and increasing oxidative stress, abdominal fat lipolysis, and hepatic lipogenesis. Moreover, considerable evidence shows the central role of intestinal dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of MASLD and the impact of nicotine-induced oxidative stress on the gut microbiome. This results in an intricate network in which oxidative stress stands at the intersection point between gut microbiome, nicotine, and MASLD. The aim of this review is to delve into the molecular mechanisms linking tobacco smoking and MASLD, focusing on nicotine-induced microbiota modifications and their impact on MASLD development.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), comprising Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, are systemic and multifaceted disorders which affect other organs in addition to the gastrointestinal tract in up to 50% of cases. Extraintestinal manifestations may present before or after IBD diagnosis and negatively impact the intestinal disease course and patients’ quality of life, often requiring additional diagnostic evaluations or specific treatments. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. Current evidence shows an increased prevalence of NAFLD (and its more advanced stages, such as liver fibrosis and steatohepatitis) in IBD patients compared to the general population. Many different IBD-specific etiopathogenetic mechanisms have been hypothesized, including chronic inflammation, malabsorption, previous surgical interventions, changes in fecal microbiota, and drugs. However, the pathophysiological link between these two diseases is still poorly understood. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential mechanisms which have been investigated so far and highlight open issues still to be addressed for future studies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent among primary liver tumors (90%) and one of the main causes of cancer-related death. It develops usually in a chronically inflamed environment, ranging from compensatory parenchymal regeneration to fibrosis and cirrhosis: carcinogenesis can potentially happen in each of these stages. Inflammation determined by chronic viral infection (hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and hepatitis delta viruses) represents an important risk factor for HCC etiology through both viral direct damage and immune-related mechanisms. The deregulation of the physiological liver immunological network determined by viral infection can lead to carcinogenesis. The recent introduction of immunotherapy as the gold-standard first-line treatment for HCC highlights the role of the immune system and inflammation as a double-edged weapon in both HCC carcinogenesis and treatment. In this review we highlight how the inflammation is the key for the hepatocarcinogenesis in viral, alcohol and metabolic liver diseases.

Background/Objectives: Liver fibrosis is a progressive consequence of chronic liver injury that can evolve into cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma, representing a major global health burden. Fibrogenesis is driven by hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation, excessive extracellular matrix deposition, and structural disruption of liver tissue, with transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) signaling and inflammatory mediators as central pathways. Current therapies primarily target the underlying causes, which may halt disease progression but rarely reverse established fibrosis. This review aims to outline current and emerging therapeutic strategies for liver fibrosis, informing both clinical practice and future research directions. Methods: A narrative synthesis of preclinical and clinical evidence was conducted, focusing on pharmacological interventions, microbiota-directed strategies, and innovative modalities under investigation for antifibrotic activity. Results: Bile acids, including ursodeoxycholic acid and derivatives, modulate HSC activity and autophagy. Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonists, such as obeticholic acid, reduce fibrosis but are limited by adverse effects. Fatty acid synthase inhibitors, exemplified by denifanstat, show promise in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additional strategies include renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, omega-3 fatty acids, and agents targeting the gut–liver axis. Microbiota-directed interventions—probiotics, prebiotics, symbiotics, antibiotics (e.g., rifaximin), and fecal microbiota transplantation—are emerging as potential modulators of barrier integrity, inflammation, and fibrogenesis, though larger clinical trials are required. Reliable non-invasive biomarkers and innovative trial designs, including adaptive platforms, are essential to improve patient selection and efficiently evaluate multiple agents and combinations. Conclusions: Novel modalities such as immunotherapy, gene editing, and multi-targeted therapies hold additional potential for fibrosis reversal. Continued translational efforts are critical to establish safe, effective, and accessible treatments for patients with liver fibrosis.